SITEHOUND-web: A server for ligand binding site identification in protein structures

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2009, Pages

  Hernandez, Marylens ^a   Ghersi, Dario ^a   Sanchez, Roberto ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MOLECULAR PROBE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; INTERNET; LIGANDS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 67849097355     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp281     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bartlett,G.J., Todd,A.E. and Thornton,J.M. (2003) Inferring protein function from structure. Methods Biochem. Anal., 44, 387-407.
2. Campbell,S.J., Gold,N.D., Jackson,R.M. and Westhead,D.R. (2003) Ligand binding: Functional site location, similarity and docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 13, 389-395.
3. Laskowski,R.A., Thornton,J.M., Humblet,C. and Singh,J. (1996) X-SITE: use of empirically derived atomic packing preferences to identify favourable interaction regions in the binding sites of proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 259, 175-201.
4. Laurie,A.T. and Jackson,R.M. (2005) Q-SiteFinder: An energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics 21, 1908-1916.
5. Liang,S., Zhang,C., Liu,S. and Zhou,Y. (2006) Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 3698-3707.
6. Ghersi,D. and Sanchez,R. (2009) Improving accuracy and efficiency of blind protein-ligand docking by focusing on predicted binding sites. Proteins, 74, 417-424.
7. Lichtarge,O. and Sowa,M.E. (2002) Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 12, 21-27.
8. Capra,J.A. and Singh,M. (2007) Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics, 23, 1875-1882.
9. Berezin,C., Glaser,F., Rosenberg,J., Paz,I., Pupko,T., Fariselli,P., Casadio,R. and Ben-Tal,N. (2004) ConSeq: The identification of functionally and structurally important residues in protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 20, 1322-1324.
10. del Sol Mesa,A., Pazos,F. and Valencia,A. (2003) Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. J. Mol. Biol., 326 1289-1302.
11. Morris,G.M., Goodsell,D.S., Halliday,R.S., Huey,R., Hart,W.E., Belew,R.K. and Olson,A.J. (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem., 19, 1639-1662.
12. Sali,A. and Blundell,T.L. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779-815.
13. Pettersen,E.F., Goddard,T.D., Huang,C.C., Couch,G.S., Greenblatt,D.M., Meng,E.C. and Ferrin,T.E. (2004) UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1605-1612.
14. Abele,U. and Schulz,G.E. (1995) High-resolution structures of adenylate kinase from yeast ligated with inhibitor Ap5A, showing the pathway of phosphoryl transfer. Protein Sci., 4, 1262-1271.