Contact lens wear and the goblet cells of the human conjunctiva-A review

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 157-163

  Doughty, Michael J ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bulbar conjunctiva; Contact lens wear; Goblet cells; Human; Impression cytology

Indexed keywords

MUCIN; MUCIN 5AC;

CELL ASSAY; CELL DENSITY; CELL SIZE; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONJUNCTIVA EPITHELIUM; CONTACT LENS; EX VIVO STUDY; GOBLET CELL; HUMAN; IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICROMORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPECTACLES; SQUAMOUS CELL METAPLASIA;

CONJUNCTIVA; CONTACT LENSES; GOBLET CELLS; HUMANS; MUCINS;

EID: 79960391875     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: 14765411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2011.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Craig J. Structure and function of the preocular tear film. The tear film 2002, 18-50. Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford. D.R. Korb (Ed.).
2. Cher I. A new look at the lubrication of the ocular surface: fluid mechanics behind the blinking eyelids. Ocul Surf 2008, 6:79-86.
3. Doughty M.J. The corneal and conjunctival surfaces in relation to the tear film. The tear film 2002, 1-17. Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford. D.R. Korb (Ed.).
4. Doughty M.J., Bergmanson J.P.G. New insights into surface cells and glands of the conjunctiva and their relevance to the tear film. Optometry 2003, 74:485-500.
5. Doughty M.J., Bergmanson J.P.G. Heterogeneity in the ultrastructure of the mucous (goblet) cells of the rabbit palpebral conjunctiva. Clin Exp Optom 2004, 87:377-385.
6. Doughty M.J. Impact of brief exposure to balanced salts solution or cetylpyridinium chloride on the surface appearance of the rabbit corneal epithelium-a scanning electron microscopy study. Curr Eye Res 2003, 26:335-346.
7. Doughty M.J. Scanning electron microscopy study of the tarsal and orbital conjunctival surfaces compared to peripheral corneal epithelium in pigmented rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol 1997, 93:345-371.
8. Farris R.L. Tear analysis in contact lens wearers. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1985, LXXXIII:501-545.
9. Yasueda S.-I., Yamakawa K., Nakanishi Y., Kinoshita M., Kakehi K. Decreased mucin concentrations in tear fluids of contact lens wearers. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2005, 39:187-195.
10. Hori Y., Argueso P., Spurr-Michaud S., Gipson I.K. Mucins and contact lens wear. Cornea 2006, 25:176-181.
11. Doughty M.J. Diagnostic and therapeutic pharmaceutical agents relevant to contact lens practice. Clinical contact lens practice 2005, 773-825. Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, [Chapter 41]. E. Bennett, B.A. Weissman (Eds.).
12. Gotz M.L., Jaeger W., Kruse F.E. Die Impressionszytologie als nicht invasive Methode der Bindehaut-Biopsie und ihre Ergebnisse. Klin Montasbl Augenheilkund 1986, 188:23-28.
13. Nelson J.D. Impression cytology. Cornea 1988, 7:71-81.
14. Bizzarri B.M., Fiore F., Missiroli A. Citologia conjunctivale per impressione: Una nuova stadiazione delle fasi iniziali della metaplasia squamosa, per una metodica rapida e non invasiva. Boll Ocul 1998, 77:77-88.
15. Tost F. Praktische Bindehautzytologie. Ophthalmologe 1999, 96:276-289.
16. McKelvie P. Ocular surface impression cytology. Adv Anat Pathol 2003, 10:328-337.
17. Haller-Schober E.-M., Schwantzer G., Berghold A., Fischl M., Theisl A., Horwath-Winter J. Evaluating and impression cytology grading system (IC score) in patients with dry eye syndrome. Eye 2006, 20:927-933.
18. Calonge M., Diebold Y., Saez V., Enriquez de Salamanca A., Garcia-Vazquez C., Corrales R.M., et al. Impression cytology of the ocular surface: a review. Exp Eye Res 2004, 78:457-472.
19. Lopin E., Deveney T., Asbell P.A. Impression cytology: recent advances and applications in dry eye disease. Ocul Surf 2009, 7:93-110.
20. Gotz M.L., Jaeger W., Kruse F.E. Die Impressionscytologie der Bindhaut - Eine nichtinvasive Untersuchungsmethode. II. Lichtmikroskopische Befunde bei normaler Conjunctiva, bei Keratoconjuctivitis sicca und bei Kontaktlinsentragern. Forschr Ophthalmol 1986, 83:34-38.
21. Saini J.S., Rajwanshi A., Dhar S. Clinicopathological correlation of hard contact lens related changes in tarsal conjucntiva by impression cytology. Acta Ophthalmol 1990, 68:65-70.
22. Knop E., Brewitt H. Conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic wearers of soft contact lenses. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1992, 230:340-347.
23. Knop E., Brewitt H. Induction of conjunctival epithelial alterations by contact lens wearing. German J Ophthalmol 1992, 1:125-134.
24. Knop E., Brewitt H. Morphology of the conjunctival epithelium in spectacle and contact lens wearers-a light and electron microscopic study. Contactologia 1992, 14:108-120.
25. Connor C.G., Campbell J.B., Steel S.A., Burke J.H. The effects of daily wear contact lenses on goblet cell density. J Am Optom Assoc 1994, 65:792-794.
26. Connor C.G., Campbell J.B., Steel S.A. The effects of disposable daily wear contact lenses on goblet cell count. CLAO J 1997, 23:37-39.
27. Bhatia R.P., Kumar M., Singh S. Conjunctival impression cytology and tear fluid pH in semi-soft gas permeable contact lens wearers. Ann Ophthalmol (Chic) 1995, 27:26-330.
28. Aragona P., Ferrei G., Micali A., Puzzolo D. Morphological changes of the conjunctival epithelium in contact lens wearers evaluated by impression cytology. Eye 1998, 12:461-466.
29. Adar S., Kanpolat A., Surucu S., Ucakhan O.O. Conjunctival impression cytology in patients wearing contact lenses. Cornea 1997, 16:289-294.
30. Bizzarri B., Fiore F., Bonci E., Missiroli A. Modificazioni morfofunzioali dell'epitelio conjunctivale in portatori di lenti a contatto sintomatici e non sintomatici rilevate con la citologia congiuntivale per impressione. Boll Ocul 1998, 77:221-231.
31. Debbasch C., Rat Pisella-P-J., Warnet P., Baudouin J.-M.Ch. Évaluation de la production radicalaire sur empreintes conjunctivales de patients traités au long cours par des collyres antiglaucomateux ou porteurs de lentilles de contact. J Fr Ophtalmol 2000, 23:239-244.
32. Albietz J.M. Conjunctival histologic findings of dry eye and non-dry eye contact lens wearing subjects. CLAO J 2001, 27:35-40.
33. Anshu, Munshi M.M., Sathe V., Gnaar A. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers. Cytopathology 2001, 12:314-320.
34. Pisella P.J., Malet F., Lejeune S., Brignole F., Debbasch C., Bara J., et al. Ocular surface changes induced by contact lens wear. Cornea 2001, 20:820-825.
35. Şengör T., Gürdal C., Kirimlioĝlu H., Irkeç M., Aydin S. Colour-coded mapping technique in impression cytology - findings in soft contact lens wearers and patients with other external eye diseases. Ophthalmologica 2002, 216:155-158.
36. Simon P., Jaison S.G., Chopra S.K., Jacob S. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002, 50:301-306.
37. Gürdal C., Aydin S., Kirimlioĝlu H., Toprak E., Şengor T. Effects of extended-wear soft contact lenses on the ocular surface and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmologica 2003, 217:329-336.
38. Lievens C.W., Connor C.G., Murphy H. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality. Eye Contact Lens 2003, 29:241-244.
39. Çakmak S.S., Ünlü M.K., Karaca C., Nergiz Y., İpek S. Effects of soft contact lenses on conjunctival surface. Eye Contact Lens 2003, 29:230-233.
40. Moon J.W., Shin K.C., Lee H.-J., Wee W.R., Lee J.H., Kim M.K. The effect of contact lens wear on the ocular surface changes in keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 2006, 32:96-101.
41. Doughty M.J., Naase T. Nucleus and cell size changes in human bulbar conjunctival cells after soft contact lens wear, as assessed by impression cytology. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2008, 31:131-140.
42. Tomatir D.K., Erda N., Gürlü V.P. Effects of different contact lens materials and contact lens-wearing periods on conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens 2008, 34:166-168.
43. Corrales R.M., Galarreta D., Herreras J.M., Saez V., Arranz I., González M.J., et al. Conjunctival mucin mRNA expression in contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2009, 86:1051-1058.
44. Doughty MJ. Objective assessment of contact lens wear-associated conjunctival squamous metaplasia by linear measures of cell size, shape and nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratios. Curr Eye Res, in press.
45. Egbert P.R., Lauber S., Maurice D.M. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol 1977, 84:798-801.
46. Hirji N.K., Larke J.R. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens practice. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1981, 4:159-161.
47. Hirji N.K., Scott J., Sabell A.G. Conjunctival cytology in hard and soft contact lens wear. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1985, 5:333-335.
48. Tseng S.C.G. Staging of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by impression cytology. Ophthalmology 1985, 92:728-733.
49. Nelson J.D., Wright J.C. Impression cytology of the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. The preocular tear film in health, disease, and contact lens wear 1986, 140-156. Dry Eye Institute, Lubbock, TX. F.J. Holly (Ed.).
50. Heiligenhaus A., Koch J.M., Kruse F.E., Schwarz C., Waubke ThN. Diagnostik und Differenzierung von Benatzungsstörungen. Der Ophthalmologe 1995, 92:6-11.
51. Murube J., Rivas L. Impression cytology on conjunctiva and cornea in dry eye patients establishes a correlation between squamous metaplasia and dry eye clinical severity. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003, 13:115-127.
52. Doughty M.J., Blades K., Button N.F., Wilson G. Further analysis of the size and shape of cells obtained by impression cytology from the exposed portion of the human bulbar conjunctiva. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2000, 20:391-400.
53. Doughty MJ. Objective assessment of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by measures of cell and nucleus dimensions. Diagn Cytopathol, in press.
54. Liotet S., Triclot M.P., Perderiset M., Warnet V.N., Laroche L. The role of conjunctival mucus in contact lens fitting. CLAO J 1985, 11:149-154.
55. Doughty M.J. On the use of NIH Image J for objective assessment of conjunctival cell and nucleus dimensions of impression cytology samples. Eye Contact Lens 2011, 37:50-56.
56. Terry R.L., Schnider C.M., Holden B.A., Cornish R., Grant T., Sweeney D., et al. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993, 70:234-243.
57. Rolando M., Terragna F., Giordano G., Calabrai G. Conjunctival surface damage distribution in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. An impression cytology study. Ophthalmologia 1990, 200:170-176.
58. Nelson J.D., Wright J.C. Conjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface disease. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102:1049-1051.
59. Efron N., Al-Dossari M., Pritchard N. Confocal microscopy of the bulbar conjunctiva in contact lens wear. Cornea 2010, 29:43-52.
60. Peral A., Pintor J. Ocular mucin visualization by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cornea 2008, 27:395-401.