Authenticity of instruction and student performance: A prospective randomised trial

Medical Education

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 807-817

  La Rochelle, Jeffrey S ^a,b   Durning, Steven J ^a,b   Pangaro, Louis N ^a,b   Artino, Anthony R ^a,b   van der Vleuten, Cees P M ^a,b   Schuwirth, Lambert ^a,b  

^a Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center   (United States)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING; TEACHING MATERIALS;

EID: 79960380381     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03994.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Richardson W. Integrating evidence into clinical diagnosis. In: Montori V, ed. Evidence-Based Endocrinology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research 2006;69-85.
2. Ericsson K. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:988-94.
3. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 2000;3-127.
4. Norman G. Teaching basic science to optimise transfer. Med Teach 2009;31:807-11.
5. Carter MB, Wesley G, Larson GM. Lecture versus standardised patient interaction in the surgical clerkship: a randomised prospective crossover study. Am J Surg 2006;191:262-7.
6. Davidson R, Duerson M, Rathe R, Pauly R, Watson RT. Using standardised patients as teachers: a concurrent controlled trial. Acad Med 2001;76:840-3.
7. van Zanten M, Boulet JR, Norcini JJ, McKinley D. Using a standardised patient assessment to measure professional attributes. Med Educ 2005;39:20-9.
8. Sweller J, van Merrienboer J, Paas F. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 1998;10:251-96.
9. Dai DY, Sternberg RJ. Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition: Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2004.
10. van Merrienboer JJG, Kirschner PA, Kester L. Taking the load off a learner's mind: instructional design for complex learning. Educ Psychol 2003;38:5-13.
11. Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of the constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ Psychol 2006;41:75-86.
12. Clark R. Media will never influence learning. Educ Technol Res Dev 1994;42:21-9.
13. Cook D. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 2005;80:541-8.
14. Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, Hojat M. An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using three decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system. Med Educ 2004;38:425-34.
15. van der Vleuten CP, Newble DI. How can we test clinical reasoning? Lancet 1995;345:1032-4.
16. Wetzels S. Individualised Study Strategies for Prior Knowledge Activation. Heerlen: Open University 2009.
17. Durning SJ, Artino A, Pangaro LN, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L. Redefining context in the clinical encounter: implications for research and training in medical education. Acad Med 2010;85:894-901.
18. Wilson BG, Myers K. Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In: Johansson DH, Land SM, eds. Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1999;57-88.
19. Bredo E. Reconstructing educational psychology: situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism. Educ Psychol 1994;29:23-5.
20. Young M. Instructional design for situated learning. Educ Technol Res Dev 1993;41:43-5.