Modeling Perceived Usefulness on adopting on line banking through the TAM model in a Canadian banking environment

Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Mangin, Jean Pierre Lévy ^a   Bourgault, Normand ^a   Guerrero, Mario Martinez ^b   Egea, José Manuel Ortega ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN OUTAOUAIS   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

'Perceived usefulness'; Canadian financial services; Internet; On line banking; Structural equation modeling; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960359661     PISSN: 12045357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems, 22(1), 15-29.
2. Ainin, S., Lim, C.H., & Wee, A. (2005). Prospects and Challenges of e-banking in Malaysia. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 22(1), 1-11.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
4. Akinci, S., Aksoy, S., & Atilgan, E. (2004). Adoption of Internet banking among sophisticated consumer segments in an advanced developing country. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(2/3), 212-232.
5. Al Sukkar, A., & Hasan, H. (2005). Toward a model for the acceptance of Internet banking in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 11(4), 381-398.
6. Amin, H. (2007). Internet banking adoption among young intellectuals. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-14.
7. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
8. Anderson, R. E., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003). E-satisfaction and E-Loyalty: A Contingency Framework, Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), 123-138.
9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Baumgartner, H. (1994). The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Principles of marketing research, (pp. 386-424). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (Spring), 74-94.
11. Bobbitt, L. M., & Dabholkar, P. A. (2001). Integrating attitudinal theories to understand and predict use of technology-based self-service: The Internet as an illustration. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(5), 423-450.
12. Brown, I., Hoppe, R., Mugera, P., Newman, P., & Stander, A. (2004). The Impact of National Environment on the Adoption of Internet Banking: Comparing Singapore and South Africa. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(2), 1-26.
13. Chan, S.-C., & Lu, M.-T. (2004). Understanding Internet Banking Adoption and Use Behaviour: A Hong Kong Perspective. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(3), 21-43.
14. Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J.-H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39(4), 297-311.
15. Chen, L. D., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705-719.
16. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535.
17. Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002). An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self-Service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 184-201.
18. Davis, F. D. (1986). Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.
19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3 (September)), 319-340.
20. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance Of Computer Technology: A Comparison Of Two Theorical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1004.
21. Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21.
22. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23. Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
24. Gerrard, P., & Cunningham, J. B. (2003). The diffusion of Internet banking among Singapore consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(1), 16-28.
25. Gounaris, S., & Koritos, C. (2008). Investigating the drivers of internet banking adoption decision: A comparison of three alternative frameworks. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(5), 282-304.
26. Guerrero, M. M., Egea, J. M. O., & González, M. V. R. (2007). Application of the latent class regression technique to the analysis of internet use for banking operations in the European Union. Journal of Business Research, 2(2), 137-145.
27. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
28. Karjaluoto, H., Mattila. M., Pento, T. (2002). Factors underlying attitudes formation towards online banking in Finland. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20 (6), 261-272.
29. Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1), 35-
30. Lallmahamood, M. (2007). An examination of individual's perceived security and privacy of the internet in Malaysia and the influence of this on their intention to use ecommerce: Using an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-26.
31. Lassar, W. M., Manolis, C., & Lassar, S. S. (2005). The relationship between consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and online banking adoption. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2), 179-199.
32. Lee, E.-J., Kwon, K.-N., & Schumann, D. W. (2005). Segmenting the non-adopter category in the diffusion of internet banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(5), 414-437.
33. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
34. Lu, H., & Lin, J. C.-C. (2002). Predicting customer behavior in the market-space: a study of Rayport and Sviokla's framework. Information & Management, 40(1), 1-10.
35. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
36. McKechnie, S., Winklhofer, H., & Ennew, C. (2006). Applying the technology acceptance model to the online retailing of financial services. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(4/5), 388-410.
37. Monsuwé, T. P., Dellaert, B. G. C. & Ruyter, K. D. (2004). What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(1), 102-121.
38. Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
39. Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 53(2), 375-403.
40. Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2003). A model of trust in online relationship banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(1), 5-15.
41. Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory, 3e éd. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. O'Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of Internet users Web retailing behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(2), 81-94.
43. Parasuraman, A., Colby, C.L.(2001). Techno-Ready Marketing. New-York: The Free Press.
44. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101 - 134.
45. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 14(3), 224-235.
46. Polatoglu, V. N., & Ekin, S. (2001). An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers' acceptance of Internet banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(4/5), 156-165.
47. Reid, M., & Levy, Y. (2008). Integrating trust and computer self-efficacy with TAM: An empirical assessment of customers' acceptance of banking information systems (BIS) in Jamaica. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-17.
48. Rigopoulos, G., & Askounis, D. (2007). A TAM framework to evaluate users' perception towards online electronic payments. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-6.
49. Robinson, L., Marshall, G. W. J., & Stamps, M. B. (2005). Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1623-1631.
50. Roman Gonzalez, M.V., Martinez Guerrero, M. (2004). New competitors in banking services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing Services, 9 (2), 126-137.
51. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137-155.
52. Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G., & Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. International Journal of Information Management, 27(1), 25.
53. Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
54. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 432-.
55. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
56. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
57. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
58. Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33(2), 297-316.
59. Walker, R. H., & Johnson, L. W. (2006). Why consumers use and do not use technologyenabled services. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2), 125-135.
60. Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H.-H., & Tang, T.-I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501-519.
61. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.