A phylogenetically controlled analysis of the roles of reproductive traits in plant invasions

Oecologia

Volumn 166, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1009-1017

  Burns, Jean H ^a,b   Ashman, Tia Lynn ^c   Steets, Janette A ^d   Harmon Threatt, Alexandra ^a,e   Knight, Tiffany M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Baker's law; Darwin's naturalization hypothesis; Invasive species; Phylogenetic novelty; Pollen limitation

Indexed keywords

ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; AUTOGAMY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FITNESS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATIVE SPECIES; NATURALIZATION; PHYLOGENETICS; POLLEN LIMITATION; POLLINATOR;

ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; POLLINATION; SELF FERTILIZATION;

INTRODUCED SPECIES; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

EID: 79960298289     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1929-9     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ackerly DD (2000) Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution 54: 1480-1492. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0014-3820. 2000. tb00694. x.
2. Baker HG (1955) Self-compatibility and establishment after 'long-distance' dispersal. Evolution 9: 347-349. doi: 10. 2307/2405656.
3. Baker HG (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 5: 1-24. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. es. 05. 110174. 000245.
4. Blomberg SP, Garland TJ, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0014-3820. 2003. tb00285. x.
5. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83: 2328-2336. doi: 10. 1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2328: CFPBAI]2. 0. CO; 2.
6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
7. Cadotte MW, Hamilton MA, Murray BR (2009) Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales. Divers Distrib 15: 481-488. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1472-4642. 2009. 00560. x.
8. Cahill JF, Kembel SW, Lamb EG, Keddy PA (2008) Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? Perspect Plant Ecol. Evol Syst 10: 41-50. doi: 10. 1016/j. ppees. 2007. 10. 001.
9. Cappuccino N, Carpenter D (2005) Invasive exotic plants suffer less herbivory than non-invasive exotic plants. Biol Lett 1: 435-438. doi: 10. 1098/rsbl. 2005. 0341.
10. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7: 721-733. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2004. 00616. x.
11. Daehler CC (2001) Darwin's naturalization hypothesis revisited. Am Nat 158: 324-330. doi: 10. 1086/324116.
12. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 1st edn. John Murray, London.
13. De Candolle AP (1855) Géographie Botanique Raisonné, vol 2. V. Masson, Paris.
14. Dodd ME, Silvertown J, Chase MW (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53: 732-744.
15. Duncan RP, Williams PA (2002) Darwin's naturalization hypothesis challenged. Nature 417: 608. doi: 10. 1038/417608a.
16. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125: 1-15. doi: 10. 1086/284325.
17. Fishman L, Wyatt R (1999) Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 53: 1723-1733.
18. GCW [Global Compendium of weeds] (2007) Global compendium of weeds. [WWW document]. http://www. hear. org/gcw/index. html.
19. González-Díaz N, Ackerman JD (1988) Pollination, fruit set, and seed production in the orchid Oeceoclades maculata. Lindleyana 3: 150-155.
20. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36: 47-79. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ecolsys. 36. 091704. 175539.
21. Harmon-Threatt AN, Burns JH, Shemyakina LA, Knight TM (2009) Breeding system and pollination ecology of introduced plants compared to their native relatives. Am J Bot 96: 1544-1550. doi: 10. 3732/ajb. 0800369.
22. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80: 1150-1156. doi: 10. 2307/177062.
23. Hill SB, Kotanen PM (2009) Evidence that phylogenetically novel non-indigenous plants experience less herbivory. Oecologia 161: 581-590. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-009-1403-0.
24. Keane R, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 164-170. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0.
25. Kelly CK, Woodward FI (1996) Ecological correlates of plant range size: taxonomies and phylogenies in the study of plant commonness and rarity in Great Britain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 351: 1261-1269. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 1996. 0109.
26. Knight TM, Steets J, Vamosi A, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman T-L (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36: 467-497. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ecolsys. 36. 102403. 115320.
27. Knight TM, Steets JA, Ashman T-L (2006) A quantitative synthesis of pollen supplementation experiments highlights the contribution of resource reallocation to estimates of pollen limitation. Am J Bot 93: 271-277. doi: 10. 3732/ajb. 93. 2. 271.
28. Lambdon PW, Hulme PE (2006) How strongly do interactions with closely-related native species influence plant invasions? Darwin's naturalization hypothesis assessed on Mediterranean islands. J Biogeogr 33: 1116-1125. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2699. 2006. 01486. x.
29. Lockwood JL, Simberloff D, McKinney ML, Von Holle B (2001) How many, and which, plants will invade natural areas. Biol Invasions 3: 1-8. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1011412820174.
30. Mack RN (1996) Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biol Conserv 78: 107-121. doi: 10. 1016/0006-3207(96)00021-3.
31. Maddison WP (2000) Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. J Theor Biol 202: 195-204. doi: 10. 1006/jtbi. 1999. 1050.
32. Maddison WP (2006) Pairwise comparisons package for Mesquite, version 1. 1. http://mesquiteproject. org.
33. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2009) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2. 6. http://mesquiteproject. org.
34. Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149: 646-667. doi: 10. 1080/10635150290155863.
35. Memmott J, Waser NM (2002) Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 2395-2399. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2002. 2174.
36. Moeller DA (2004) Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 85: 3289-3301. doi: 10. 1890/03-0810.
37. Moeller DA, Geber MA (2005) Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59: 786-799. doi: 10. 1554/04-656.
38. Morales CL, Traveset A (2008) Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27: 221-238. doi: 10. 1080/07352680802205631.
39. Paradis E (2006) Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution with R. Springer, New York.
40. Pearse IS, Hipp AL (2009) Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 18097-18102. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0904867106.
41. Powell KI, Krakos KN, Knight TM (2010) Comparing the reproductive success and pollination biology of an invasive plant to its rare and common native congeners: a case study in the genus Cirsium (Asteraceae). Biol Invasions doi: 10. 1007/s10530-010-9878-5.
42. Purvis A, Garland T Jr (1993) Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Syst Biol 42: 569-575. doi: 10. 2307/2992489.
43. R Statistics, R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. > http://www. R-project. org<.
44. Rambuda TD, Johnson SD (2004) Breeding systems of invasive alien plants in South Africa: does Baker's rule apply? Divers Distrib 10: 409-416. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1366-9516. 2004. 00100. x.
45. Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11: 193-203. doi: 10. 1078/1433-8319-00004.
46. Rejmánek M (1996) A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biol Conserv 78: 171-181. doi: 10. 1016/0006-3207(96)00026-2.
47. Rezende EL, Lavabre JE, Guimaraes PR Jr, Jordano P, Bascompte J (2007) Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualist networks. Nature 448: 925-928. doi: 10. 1038/nature05956.
48. Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7: 781-784. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2004. 00642. x.
49. Ricciardi A, Mottiar M (2006) Does Darwin's naturalization hypothesis explain fish invasions? Biol Invasions 8: 1403-1407. doi: 10. 1007/s10530-006-0005-6.
50. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000) Plant invasions-the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75: 65-93. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-185X. 1999. tb00041. x.
51. Sargent RD, Ackerly DD (2008) Plant-pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 123-130. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2007. 11. 003.
52. Stevens PF (2009) Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 9, June 2008. http://www. mobot. org/MOBOT/research/APweb/. Accessed 21 April 2009.
53. Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 5841-5845. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0508073103.
54. Sutherland S (2004) What makes a weed a weed: life history traits of native and exotic plants in the USA. Oecologia 141: 24-39. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-004-1628-x.
55. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), V. 4. 0 beta 10. Sinauer, Sunderland.
56. Tyson Flora (2008) Tyson flora. [WWW document]. URL http://www. biology. wustl. edu/tyson/flora. html.
57. USDA (2007) USDA Plants Database. [WWW document]. URL http://plants. usda. gov.
58. van Kleunen M, Manning JC, Pasqualetto V, Johnson SD (2008) Phylogenetically independent associations between autonomous self-fertilization and plant invasiveness. Am Nat 171: 195-201. doi: 10. 1086/525057.
59. Verhoeven KJF, Biere A, Harvey JA, van der Putten WH (2009) Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naive? Ecol Lett 12: 107-117. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2008. 01248. x.
60. Webb CO, Donoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 181-183. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1471-8286. 2004. 00829. x.
61. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33: 475-505. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ecolsys. 33. 010802. 150448.
62. Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW (2001) Evolution of angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 2211-2220. doi: 10. 1098/rspb. 2001. 1782.