Laminar flow with injection through a long dead-end cylindrical porous tube: Application to a hollow fiber membrane

AIChE Journal

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1997-2006

  Kim, Albert S ^a,b   Lee, Yong Taek ^b  

^a University of Hawaii at Manoa   (United States)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hollow fiber membrane; Injection; Laminar flow; Navier Stokes equation; Perturbation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC SOLUTION; CONTINUITY EQUATIONS; DYNAMIC EQUATIONS; FLUID VELOCITIES; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANES; HYDRAULIC RESISTANCES; NAVIER STOKES; NONLINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION; PERTURBATION; PERTURBATION APPROACH; POROUS TUBES; PRESSURE INCREASE; PRESSURE PROFILES; SEPARATION OF VARIABLES; WALL VELOCITY;

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FLUIDS; HYDRAULICS; LAMINAR FLOW; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; STREAM FLOW;

MEMBRANES;

EID: 79960283482     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12430     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Zhongwei D, Liying L, Runyu M. Study on the effect of flow maldistribution on the performance of the hollow fiber modules used in membrane distillation. J Membr Sci. 2003; 215: 11-23.
2. Busch J, Cruse A, Marquardt W. Modeling submerged hollow-fiber membrane filtration for wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci. 2007; 288: 94-111.
3. Severojr J, Almeida S, Narain N, Souza R, Santana J, Tambourgi E. Wine clarification from Spondias mombin L. pulp by hollow fiber membrane system. Process Biochem. 2007; 42: 1516-1520.
4. Tasselli F, Cassano A, Drioli E. Ultrafiltration of kiwifruit juice using modified poly(ether ether ketone) hollow fibre membranes. Sep Purif Technol. 2007; 57: 94-102.
5. Basu R, Sirkar KK. Pharmaceutical product recovery using a hollow fiber contained liquid membrane: a case study. J Membr Sci. 1992; 75: 131-149.
6. Lazarova Z, Syska B, Schügerl K. Application of large-scale hollow fiber membrane contactors for simultaneous extractive removal and stripping of penicillin G. J Membr Sci. 2002; 202: 151-164.
7. Larsson N, Utterback K, Toräng L, Risberg J, Gustafsson P, Mayer P, Jönsson JÅ. Equilibrium sampling through membranes (ESTM) of acidic organic pollutants using hollow fibre modules in continuous steady-state mode. Chemosphere. 2009; 76: 1213-1220.
8. Pankhania M, Stephenson T, Semmens MJ. Hollow fibre bioreactor for wastewater treatment using bubbleless membrane aeration. Water Res. 1994; 28: 2233-2236.
9. Yang Q, Kocherginsky N. Copper removal from ammoniacal wastewater through a hollow fiber supported liquid membrane system: modeling and experimental verification. J Membr Sci. 2007; 297: 121-129.
10. Alberti F, Bienati B, Bottino A, Capannelli G, Comite A, Ferrari F, Firpo R. Hydrocarbon removal from industrial wastewater by hollow-fibre membrane bioreactors. Desalination. 2007; 204: 24-32.
11. Yoon SH, Lee S, Yeom IT. Experimental verification of pressure drop models in hollow fiber membrane. J Membr Sci. 2008; 310: 7-12.
12. Yoon SH, Kim HS, Yeom IT. Optimization model of submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. J Membr Sci. 2004; 234: 147-156.
13. Cath T, Childress A, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci. 2006; 281: 70-87.
14. Tang W, Ng H. Concentration of brine by forward osmosis: performance and influence of membrane structure. Desalination. 2008; 224: 143-153.
15. Wang K, Chung TS, Qin JJ. Polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis process. J Membr Sci. 2007; 300: 6-12.
16. Su J, Yang Q, Teo J, Chung TS. Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes. J Membr Sci. 2010; 355: 36-44.
17. Wang R, Shi L, Tang C, Chou S, Qiu C, Fane A. Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci. 2010; 355: 158-167.
18. Xu X, Li J, Li H, Cai Y, Cao Y, He B, Zhang Y. Non-invasive monitoring of fouling in hollow fiber membrane via UTDR. J Membr Sci. 2009; 326: 103-110.
19. Carroll T, Booker NA. Axial features in the fouling of hollow-fibre membranes. J Membr Sci. 2000; 168: 203-212.
20. Chang S, Yeo A, Fane A, Cholewa M, Ping Y, Moser H. Observation of flow characteristics in a hollow fiber lumen using non-invasive X-ray microimaging (XMI). J Membr Sci. 2007; 304: 181-189.
21. Chang S, Fane A, Waite T. Analysis of constant permeate flow filtration using dead-end hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci. 2006; 268: 132-141.
22. Hong S, Bae T, Tak T, Hong S, Randall A. Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow fiber membrane bioreactors. Desalination. 2002; 143: 219-228.
23. Berman AS. Laminar flow in channels with porous walls. J Appl Phys. 1953; 24: 1232-1235.
24. Yuan SW, Finkelstein AB. Laminar pipe flow with injection and suction through a porous wall. Trans ASME. 1956; 78: 719-724.
25. Berman AS. Concerning laminar flow in channels with porous walls. J Appl Phys. 1956; 27: 1557-1558.
26. Terrill R, Thomas P. On laminar flow through a uniformly porous pipe. Appl Sci Res. 1969; 21: 37-67.
27. Chellam S, Liu M. Effect of slip on existence, uniqueness, and behavior of similarity solutions for steady incompressible laminar flow in porous tubes and channels. Phys Fluids. 2006; 18: 083601.
28. Brady JF, Acrivos A. Steady flow in a channel or tube with an accelerating surface velocity. an exact solution to the Navier-Stokes equations with reverse flow. J Fluid Mech. 1981; 112: 127-150.
29. Belfort G, Davis RH, Zydney AL. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J Membr Sci. 1994; 96: 1-58.
30. Bouchard C, Carreau P, Matsuura T, Sourirajan S. Modeling of ultrafiltration: predictions of concentration polarization effects. J Membr Sci. 1994; 97: 215-229.
31. Denisov GA. Theory of concentration polarization in cross-flow ultrafiltration: gel-layer model and osmotic-pressure model. J Membr Sci. 1994; 91: 173-187.
32. Lee Y, Clark M. Modeling of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions. J Membr Sci. 1998; 149: 181-202.
33. Belfort G. Membrane modules: comparison of different configurations using fluid mechanics. J Membr Sci. 1988; 35: 245-270.
34. Wiley D, Fletcher D. Techniques for computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow in membrane channels. J Membr Sci. 2003; 211: 127-137.
35. Ghidossi R, Daurelle J, Veyret D, Moulin P. Simplified CFD approach of a hollow fiber ultrafiltration system. Chem Eng J. 2006; 123: 117-125.
36. Potts DE, Ahlert RC, Wang SS. A critical review of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination. 1981; 36: 235-264.
37. Williams F. Linearized analysis of constant-property duct flows. J Fluid Mech. 1968; 34: 241-261.
38. Mishra S, Roy J. Laminar elasticoviscous flow in an annulus with porous walls. Phys Fluids. 1967; 10: 2300-2304.
39. Skalak F, Wang CY. Pulsatile flow in a tube with wall injection and suction. Appl Sci Res. 1977; 33: 269-307.
40. Thorman J, Hwang ST. Compressible flow in permeable capillaries under deformation. Chem Eng Sci. 1978; 33: 15-20.
41. Majdalani J, Flandro GA. The oscillatory pipe flow with arbitrary wall injection. Proc R Soc A. 2002; 458: 1621-1651.
42. Kinney R. Fully developed frictional and heat-transfer characteristics of laminar flow in porous tubes. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1968; 11: 1393-1401.
43. Raithby G. Laminar heat transfer in the thermal entrance region of circular tubes and two-dimensional rectangular ducts with wall suction and injection. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1971; 14(2): 223-243.
44. Wang P, Wehrmeyer J, Pitz R. Stretch rate of tubular premixed flames. Combust Flame. 2006; 145: 401-414.
45. Lim S, Tan X, Li K. Gas/vapour separation using membranes: effect of pressure drop in lumen of hollow fibres. Chem Eng Sci. 2000; 55: 2641-2652.
46. Monge LE. Improved reverse osmosis permeation by heating. J Food Sci. 2006; 38: 633-636.
47. Deng X, Marois Y, How T, Merhi Y, King M, Guidoin R. Luminal surface concentration of lipoprotein (LDL) and its effect on the wall uptake of cholesterol by canine carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21: 135-145.
48. Friedlander S, Walser M. Some aspects of flow and diffusion in the proximal tubule of the kidney. J Theor Biol. 1965; 8: 87-96.
49. Jacquez J, Foster D, Daniels E. Solute concentration in the kidney. I. A model of the renal medulla and its limit cases. Math Biosci. 1976; 32: 307-335.
50. Moussy Y. Bioartificial kidney. I. Theoretical analysis of convective flow in hollow fiber modules: application to a bioartificial hemofilter. Biotech Bioeng. 2000; 68: 142-152.
51. Reay D, Thiele F. Heat pipe theory applied to a biological system: quantification of the role of the "resting" eccrine sweat gland in thermoregulation. J Theor Biol. 1977; 64: 789-803.
52. Karode S. Laminar flow in channels with porous walls, revisited. J Membr Sci. 2001; 191: 237-241.
53. Kozinski AA, Schmidt FP, Lightfoot EN. Velocity profiles in porous-walled ducts. Ind Eng Chem Fundam. 1970; 9: 502-505.
54. Kim J, DiGiano F. Defining critical flux in submerged membranes: influence of length-distributed flux. J Membr Sci. 2006; 280: 752-761.
55. The American Water Works Research Foundation. Water Treatment Membrane Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
56. Zeman LJ, Zydney AL. Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration: Principles and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1996.
57. Richard W Baker L. Membrane Technology and Applications, 2nd ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2004.
58. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publications, 1996.
59. Zydney A. Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems. J Membr Sci. 1997; 130: 275-281.
60. Bhattacharyya D, Back S, Kermode R, Roco M. Prediction of concentration polarization and flux behavior in reverse osmosis by numerical analysis. J Membr Sci. 1990; 48: 231-262.
61. Kim AS. Permeate flux inflection due to concentration polarization in crossflow membrane filtration: a novel analytic approach. Eur Phys J E. 2007; 24: 331-341.
62. Michaels AS. New separation technique for the CPI. Chem Eng Prog. 1968; 64: 31-43.
63. Bacchin P. A possible link between critical and limiting flux for colloidal systems: consideration of critical deposit formation along a membrane. J Membr Sci. 2004; 228: 237-241.
64. Bacchin P, Aimar P, Field RW. Critical and sustainable fluxes: theory, experiments and applications. J Membr Sci. 2006; 281: 42-69.
65. Kim AS, Liu Y. Critical flux of hard sphere suspensions in crossflow filtration: hydrodynamic force bias Monte Carlo simulations. J Membr Sci. 2008; 323: 67-76.
66. Song L. A new model for the calculation of the limiting flux in ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci. 1998; 144: 173-185.