Hydrocarbon removal from industrial wastewater by hollow-fibre membrane bioreactors

Desalination

Volumn 204, Issue 1-3 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 24-32

  Alberti, Federica ^a   Bienati, Barbara ^a   Bottino, Aldo ^a   Capannelli, Gustavo ^a   Comite, Antonio ^a   Ferrari, Fiorenza ^a   Firpo, Raffaella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hydrocarbon removal; Membrane bioreactors; Microfiltration; Submerged hollow fibre membranes

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; HYDROCARBONS; MICROFILTRATION; REMOVAL;

HYDROCARBON REMOVAL; MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; SUBMERGED HOLLOW-FIBRE MEMBRANES;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; HYDROCARBONS; MICROFILTRATION; REMOVAL; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FILTRATION; HYDROCARBON; MEMBRANE; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 33846633291     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Yang W., Cicek N., and Ilg J. State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: Worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J. Membr. Sci. 270 (2006) 201-211
2. Gander M., Jefferson B., and Judd S. Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Separ. Purif. Technol. 18 (2000) 119-130
3. Zhang S., Van Houten R., Eikelboom D.H., Doddema H., Jiang Z., Fan Y., and Wang J. Sewage treatment by a low energy membrane bioreactor. Biores. Technol. 90 (2003) 185-192
4. Yoon T.I., Lee H.S., and Kim C.G. Comparison of pilot scale performances between membrane bioreactor and hybrid conventional waste water treatment system. J. Membr. Sci. 242 (2004) 5-12
5. Yoon S.H., Kim H.S., and Yeom I.T. The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment. Water Res. 38 (2004) 37-46
6. Scholz W., and Fuchs W. Treatment of oil contaminated waste water in a membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 14 (2000) 3621-3629
7. Cheng C., Phipps D., and Alkhaddar R.M. Treatment of spent metalworking fluids. Water Res. 17 (2005) 4051-4063
8. M. Clara, B. Strenn, O. Gans, E. Martinez, N. Kreuzinger and H. Kroiss, Removal of selected pharmaceutical, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants, Water Res., 39 (2205) 4797-4807.
9. Wen X., Ding H., Huang X., and Liu R. Treatment of hospital waste water using a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 39 (2004) 1427-1431
10. Petrovic M., Gonzalez S., and Barceló D. Analysis and removal of emerging contaminants in wastewater and drinking water. Trends Anal. Chem. 10 (2003) 685-696
11. Wang Y., Huang X., and Yuan Q. Nitrogen and carbon removals from food processing waste water by an anoxic/aerobic membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 1733-1739
12. Artiga P., Ficara E., Malpei F., Garrido J.M., and Mendez R. Treatment of two industrial waste water in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination 179 (2005) 161-169
13. Van der Bruggen B., Curcio E., and Drioli E. Process intensification in the textile industry: the role of membrane technology. J. Environ. Manag. 73 (2004) 267-274
14. Pollice A., Brookes A., Jefferson B., and Judd S. Sub-critical flux fouling in membrane bioreactors: a review of recent literature. Desalination 174 (2005) 221-230
15. AWWA, WEF, APHA, Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, XVIII ed., Washington, DC, 1992.
16. Chang I.S., and Kim S.N. Watewater treatment using membrane filtration - effect of biosolids concentration on cake resistance. Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 1307-1314
17. Ognier S., Wisniewiski C., and Grasmick A. Membrane bioreactor fouling in sub-critical filtration conditions: a local flux concept. J. Membr. Sci. 229 (2004) 171-177
18. Howell J.A., Chua H.C., and Arnot T.C. In situ manipulation of critical flux in a submerged membrane bioreactor using variable aeration rates, and effects of membrane history. J. Membr. Sci. 242 (2004) 13-19