The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via internet: Theoretical and practical aspects

Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 209-227

  Amichai Hamburger, Yair ^a  

^a INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960253916     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511813740.010     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y.,&Furnham, A. (2006). The positive net. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1033-1045.
3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 825-843.
4. Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319-342.
5. Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In P. A. Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism (pp. 73-123). New York: Plenum Press.
6. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590.
7. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzimmons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33-48.
8. Bell, B., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams, implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27, 14-49.
9. Bodenhausen, G.V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319-322.
10. Bodenhausen, G. V., &Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision-making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 267-282.
11. Branscomb, A. W. (1995). Anonymity, autonomy, and accountability: Challenges to the First Amendment in cyberspaces. 104 Yale L.J. 1639-1679.
12. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 281-302). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Brown, R. J. (2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Climent, S., Moré, J., Oliver, A., Salvatierra, M., Taulé, M., Sanchez, I., & Vallmanya, L. (2003). Bilingual newsgroups in Catalonia: A challenge for machine translation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(1). Retrieved April 28, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/climent.html.
15. Cook, S. W. (1962). The systematic analysis of socially significant events: A strategy for social research. Journal of Social Issues, 18, 66-84.
16. Cook, S. W. (1984). Cooperative interaction in multiethnic contexts. In M. Brewer (Ed.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 155-185). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17. Coughlin, D. (2001). Correlating automated and human assessments of machine translation quality. In Proceedings of MT Summit IX (pp. 63-70) New Orleans, LA.
18. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
19. Douglas, K. M.,&McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and self-presentation: Computermediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416.
20. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Galegher, J.,&Kraut, R. E. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: An experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5, 110-138.
22. Garcia-Marques, L., & Mackie, D. M. (1999). The impact of stereotype incongruent information on perceived group variability and stereotype change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 979-990.
23. Gilbert, D.T.,&Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
24. Glick, P. (2002). Sacrificial lambs dressed in wolves' clothing: Envious prejudice, ideology, and the scapegoating of Jews. In L. S. Newman & R. Erber (Eds.), Understanding genocide: The social psychology of the Holocaust (pp. 113-142). London: Oxford University Press.
25. Hamburger, Y. (1994). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Effects of the atypical outgroup member on the outgroup stereotype. Basic Applied Social Psychology, 15, 339-358.
26. Hewstone, M.,&Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the Contact Hypothesis. In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Hewstone, M., & Hamberger, J. (2000). Perceived variability and stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 103-124.
28. Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111.
29. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
30. Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31. Kim, J. A. (2000). Community building on the Web: Secret strategies for successful online communities. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
32. Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
33. Linville, P. W., & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group member. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703.
34. Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2002). From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
35. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6, 116-127.
36. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
37. Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387-410.
38. Neuberg, S. L., & Cottrell, C. A. (2002). Intergroup emotions: A biocultural approach. In D. M. Mackie&E.R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup relations: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 265-283). New York: Psychology Press.
39. Orengo Castellá, V., Zornoza Abad, A. M., Prieto Alonso, F.,&Peiro Silla, J. M. (2000). The influence of familiarity among group members, group atmosphere and assertiveness on uninhibited behavior through three different communication media. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 141-159.
40. Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Pay, H. (2004). Increased group dispersion after exposure to one deviant group member: Testing Hamburger's model of member-to-group generalization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 569-585.
41. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). The affective component of prejudice: Empirical support for the new view. In S. A. Tuch & J. K. Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change (pp. 76-90). Westport, CT: Praeger.
42. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
43. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
44. Shore, L. M. & Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 637-643.
45. Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Hypothesis testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
46. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computermediated communication. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 91-107.
47. Stephan, W. G. (1986). The effects of school desegregation: An evaluation 30 years after Brown. In M. J. Saks & L. Saxe (Eds.), Advances in Applied Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 181-206). New York: Erlbaum.
48. Stephan, W. G., & Cookie, W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Newbury, CA: Sage.
49. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C.W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-175.
50. Stephan, W. G.,&Stephan, C.W. (1996). Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks. In D. W. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 111-136). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
51. Thompson, L., & Nadler, J. (2002). Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 109-124.
52. Trope, Y., & Thompson, E. (1997). Looking for the truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 229-241.
53. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 13-43.
54. Wilder, D. A. (1993). The role of anxiety in facilitating stereotypic judgments of outgroup behavior. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 87-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
55. Wilder, D. A., & Shapiro, P. (1989). Role of competition-induced anxiety in limiting the beneficial impact of positive behavior by an out-group member. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 60-69.