The puzzle of indirect speech

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 43, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2861-2865

  Terkourafi, Marina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960253752     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.003     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Allan Keith Linguistic Meaning 1986, vol. 1. Routledge, London.
2. Attardo Salvatore Locutionary and perlocutionary cooperation: the perlocutionary principle. Journal of Pragmatics 1997, 27:753-779.
3. Blum-Kulka Shoshana Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?. Journal of Pragmatics 1987, 11:131-146.
4. Brown Penelope, Levinson Stephen Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage 1987, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Busse Ulrich Changing politeness strategies in English requests: a diachronic investigation. Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Professor Akio Oizumi (= Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature, 2) 2002, 17-35. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main. J. Fisiak (Ed.).
6. Copestake Ann, Terkourafi Marina Conventionalized speech act formulae: from corpus findings to formalization. Constraints in Discourse 2010, vol. 2 (=Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 194):125-140. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
7. Culpeper Jonathan Politeness and impoliteness. Pragmatics of Society, Handbooks of Pragmatics 2011, vol. 5:391-436. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
8. Culpeper, Jonathan, 2009. Myth 3: The British are becoming more impolite as the years go by. (accessed 28.10.10). http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/impoliteness/myths.htm.
9. Davies Bethan Communities of practice: legitimacy not choice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2005, 9(4):557-581.
10. Grice Herbert Paul Logic and conversation. Studies in the Way of Words 1975/1989, 22-40. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. H.P. Grice (Ed.).
11. Holtgraves Thomas, Yang Joong-Nam Politeness as universal: cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:719-729.
12. Larson Meredith, Doran Ryan, McNabb Yaron, Baker Rachel, Berends Matthew, Djalali Alex, Ward Gregory Distinguishing THE SAID from the implicated using a novel experimental paradigm. Semantics and Pragmatics: From Experiment to Theory 2009, 74-93. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. U. Sauerland, K. Yatsushiro (Eds.).
13. Lee James, Pinker Steven Rationales for indirect speech: the theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review 2010, 117(3):785-807.
14. Marquez Reiter Rosina Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. (=Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 83) 2000, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
15. Matsumura Yoshiko, Chinami Kyoko Politeness in Japanese conversations between people with different social ranking: a discourse-based review of Brown and Levinson (1987). Presented at the International Symposium for Linguistic Politeness 1999.
16. Pinker Steven, Nowak Martin, Lee James The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(3):833-838.
17. Van Rooij Robert Being polite is a handicap: towards a game theoretical analysis of polite linguistic behavior. Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 9) 2003, 45-58. SenSys '03, Los Angeles, CA. M. Tennenholtz (Ed.).
18. Scollon Ron, Scollon Susan Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach 1995, Blackwell, Oxford.
19. Searle John Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III: Speech Acts 1975, 59-82. Academic Press, New York. P. Cole, J. Morgan (Eds.).
20. Searle John Mind, Language, and Society: Philosophy in the Real World 1998, Basic Books, New York.
21. Sifianou Maria Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition. Multilingua 1993, 12(1):69-79. Reprinted in: Kiesling, Scott, Bratt Paulston, Cristina (Eds.), Intercultural Discourse and Communication: The Essential Readings. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 217-225.
22. Terkourafi Marina Politeness and formulaicity: evidence from Cypriot Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 2002, 3:179-201.
23. Terkourafi Marina An argument for a frame-based approach to politeness: evidence from the use of the imperative in Cypriot Greek. Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness 2005, 99-116. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.T. Lakoff, I. Sachiko (Eds.).
24. Terkourafi Marina Toward a universal notion of face for a universal notion of co-operation. Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects 2007, 313-344. de Gruyter, Berlin. I. Kecskes, L. Horn (Eds.).
25. Tomasello Michael Why We Cooperate 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Turner Ken The principal principles of pragmatic inference: politeness. Language Teaching 1996, 29:1-13.
27. Weizman Elda Interlanguage requestive hints. Interlanguage Pragmatics 1993, 123-137. Oxford University Press, Oxford. G. Kasper, S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.).
28. Wierzbicka Anna Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction 2003, de Gruyter, Berlin.