The principal principles of pragmatic inference: Politeness

Language Teaching

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-13

  Turner, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010174779     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444800008211     Document Type: Review

References (188)

1. Adeguija, Efurosibina (1989). A comparative study of politeness phenomena in Nigerian English, Yoruba andOgori. Multilingua, 8, 57-80.
2. Agha, Asif (1994). Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 277-302
3. Allan, Keith (1986). Linguistic meaning: Volume 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Allwood, Jens (1987). Linguistic communication as action and cooperation: a study hi pragmatics (2nd edition). Gothenburg Graphic Systems AB: Monographs in Linguistics 2.
5. Armengaud, Francoise (1993). La pragmatique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
6. Aronsson, Karin R., Bengt, (1989). Cats, dogs, and sweets in the clinical negotiation of reality: on politeness and coherence in pediatric discourse. Language in Society, 18, 483-504.
7. Aston, Guy (1988). Learning comity: an approach to the description and pedagogy of interactional speech. Bologna: Editrice Clueb.
8. Austin, Paddy (1988). The dark side of politeness: a pragmatic analysis of non-cooperative communication. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury.
9. Austin, Paddy (1990). Politeness revisited -the dark side. In Allan Bell and Janet Holmes (eds.), New Zealand ways of speaking English, 277-93. Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
10. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (ed.)(1971). Pragmatics of natural languages. Dordrecht: Rcidcl Publishing Company.
11. Baxter, Leslie A. (1984). An investigation of compliancegaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10, 427-56.
12. Bayraktaroglu, Arin (1991). Politeness and interactional imbalance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92, 5-34.
13. Bertuccelli-Papi, Marcella (1993). Che cos’è la pragmatica? Milano: Bompiani.
14. Blakemore, Diane (1992). Understanding utterances: an introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
15. Blommaert, Jan & Verschueren, Jef (eds.) (1991). The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication: selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 17-22 August 1987 and the Ghent Symposium on Intercultural Communication. Volume 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
16. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 131-46.
17. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1990). You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: parental politeness in family discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 259-88.
18. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1992). The mctapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 255-80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Danet, Brenda & Gherson, Rlmona (1985). The language of requesting in Israeli society. In Joseph P. Forgas (ed.), Language and social situations, 113-39. Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane & Kasper, Gabriele (eds.) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablcx Publishing Corporation.
21. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana S., Hadess, (1993). The metapragmatic discourse of American-Israeli families at dinner. In Gabriel Kasper & Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds.), p. 196-223.
22. Bourdieu, Pierre (1982). Ce que parler vent dire: l’èconomie des changes linguistiques. Paris: Arthéme Fayard.
23. Brend, Ruth M. (1978). Politeness. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 16, 253-6.
24. Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction, 56-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: some universals of language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Brown, Roger (1988). More than P's and Q's. Contemporary Psychology, 33, 749-50.
27. Brown, Roger (1990). Politeness theory: exemplar and exemplary. In Irvin Rock (ed.), Tlie legacy of Solomati Asch: essays in cognition and social psychology, 23-38. Hove/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Brown, Roger & Gilman, Albert (1989). Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18, 159-212.
29. Burt, Susan Meredith (1990). External and internal conflict: conversational code-switching and the theory of politeness. Sociolinguistics, 19, 21-35.
30. Butler, Christopher S. (1988). Politeness and the semantics of modalised directives in English. In J. D. Benson, M. Cummings & W. S. Greaves (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective, 119-53. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
31. Butler, Christopher S. & Channell, Joanna (1989). Researching politeness in a second language. In Christopher S. Butler, Richard A. Cardwell and Joanna Channell (eds.), Language and literature -theory and practice: a tribute to Walter Grauberg, 1-16. Nottingham Linguistic Circular Special Issue in association with University of Nottingham Monographs in the Humanities.
32. Carrell, Patricia L. & Konneker, Beverly H. (1981). Politeness: comparing native and nonnativc judgements. Language Learning, 31, 17-30.
33. Cherry, Roger D. (1988). Politeness in written persuasion. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 63-81.
34. Clark, Herbert & Carlson, Thomas (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58, 332-73.
35. Clark, Herbert H. & Schunk, Dale H. (1980). Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8, 111-43.
36. Clark, Herbert H. & Schunk, Dale H. (1981). Politeness in requests: a rejoinder to Kemper and Thissen. Cognition, 9, 311-15.
37. Coupland, Nikolas, Grainger, Karen & Coupland, Justine (1988). Politeness in context: intergencrational issues (review article). Language in Society, 17, 253-62.
38. Craig, R. T., Tracy, K. & Spisak, F., (1986). The discourse of requests: assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12, 437-68.
39. Dascal, Marcelo (1983). Pragmatics and the philosophy of mind 1: Thought in language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
40. Davies, Eirlys E. (1987). A contrastivc approach to the analysis of politeness formulas. Applied Linguistics, 8, 75-88.
41. Davis, Steven (ed.) (1991). Pragmatics: a reader. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. D'Souza, Jean (1988). Interactional strategies in South Asian languages: their implications for teaching English internationally. World Englishes, 7, p. 159-71.
43. Dufon, Margaret A., Kasper, Gabriele, Takahashi, Satomi & Yoshinaga, Naoko (1994). Bibliography on linguistic politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 527-78.
44. Dzameshie, Alex K. (1995). Social motivations for politeness behavior in Christian sermonic discourse. Anthropological Linguistics, 37, 192-215.
45. Errington, J. Joseph (1988). Structure and style in Javanese: a semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
46. Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria (1993). Introduction a la pragmatica. Barcelona: Anthropos.
47. Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria (1996). Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. In Katarzyna Jaszczolt & Ken Turner (eds.), Selected papers from the First International Conference on Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier.
48. Fasold, Ralph (1990). Tlie sociolinguistics of language: Introduction to sociolinguistics, Volume 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
49. Ferguson, Charles A. (1981). The structure and use of politeness formulas. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine: explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech, 21-35. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
50. Fill, Alwin (1986). ‘Divided illocution’ in conversational and other situations -and some of its implications. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 27-34.
51. Fonseca, Joaguim (1994). Pragmática linguistica: introdução, teoriae descrição do Português. Porto: Porto Editora.
52. Fraser, Bruce (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219-36.
53. Fraser, Bruce & Nolan, William (1981). The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 93-109.
54. Gallardo-PaÚls, Beatriz (1993). Lingilistica perceptiva y conversatión: secuencias. València: Universitat de València.
55. Gazdar, Gerald (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition, and logical form. London/New York: Academic Press.
56. Gazdar, Gerald (1980). Pragmatics and logical form. Journal of Pragmatics, 4, 1-13.
57. Givón, Talmy (1989). Mind, code and context: essays in pragmatics. London/Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Glover, Kelly D. (1995). A prototype view of context and linguistic behaviour: context prototypes and talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 137-56.
59. Gobber, Giovanni (ed.) (1992). La linguistica pragmatica: atti del XXIV Congresso della Societa di Linguistica Italiana, Milano, 4-6 September 1990. Roma: Bulzoni.
60. Goffman, Erving (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213-31. Reprinted in his (1967) Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behaviour, 5-45.
61. Goffman, Erving (1956). The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist, 58, 473-502. Reprinted in his (1967)
62. Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behaviour, 47-95. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
63. Goffman, Erving (1981). Footing. In his Forms of talk, 124-59.
64. Gonzales, M., Pederson, J., Manning, D. & Wetter, D. (1990). Pardon my gaffe: effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 610-21.
65. Green, Georgia M., (1989). Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey/Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Grice, Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-58. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.
67. Grice, Paul (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: Harvard University Press.
68. Grimshaw, Allen D. (1979). Review of E. N. Goody (cd.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. Language in Society, 8, 112-20.
69. Grundy, Peter (1995). Doing pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
70. Gu, Yueguo (1990). Politeness in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 237-57.
71. Haberland, Hartmut & Mey, Jacob L. (1977). Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 1-12.
72. Hagge, John & Kostelnick, Charles (1989). Linguistic politeness in professional prose: a discourse analysis of auditor's suggestion letters, with implications for business communication pedagogy. Written Communication, 6, 312-39.
73. Harnish, Robert M. (ed.) (1994). Basic topics in the philosophy of language. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
74. Held, Gudrun (1992). Politeness in linguistic research. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 131-53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
75. Hill, Beverly, Ide, Sachiko, Ikuta, Shoko, Kawasaki, Akiko & Ogino, Tsunao (1986). Universals of linguistic politeness: quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 347-71.
76. Hiraga, M. K. & Turner, J. M. (1996). Differing perceptions of face in British and Japanese academic settings. In Jaszczolt & Turner (eds.).
77. Ho, David Yau-Fai (1975). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-84.
78. Holmes, Janet (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
79. Holtgraves, Thomas (1991). Interpreting questions and replies: effects of face-threat, question form and gender. SocialPsychology Quarterly, 54, 15-24.
80. Holtc. Raves, Thomas & Yang, Joong-Nam (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246-56.
81. Horn, Laurence R. (1988). Pragmatic theory. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey 1. Linguistic theory: foundations, 113-45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Horn, Laurence R. (1992). Pragmatics, implicaturc, and presupposition. In William Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, Volume 3, 260-6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83. House, Juliane & Kasper, Gabriele (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine: explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech, 157-85. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
84. Hu, Hsien Chin (1944). The Chinese concepts of ‘face’. American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64.
85. Hudson, Richard A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
86. Hymes, Dell H. (1986). Discourse: scope without depth. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 57, 49-89.
87. Ine Sachiko (1989). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universal of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8, 223-48.
88. E. Sachiko (1989). Preface: the search for integrated universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 12, p. 7-11.
89. Janney, Richard W. & Arndt, Horst (1993). Universality and relativity in cross-cultural politeness research: a historical perspective. Multilingua, 12, 13-50.
90. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna & Turner, Ken (eds.) (1996). Selected papers from the First International Conference on Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier.
91. Johnson, Donna M. (1992). Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts. Applied Linguistics, 13, 51-71.
92. Johnson, Donna M. & Yang, Agnes Weigun (1990). Politeness strategics in peer review texts. In Lawrence F. Bouton & Yamuna Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning. Volume 1, 99-114. Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
93. Jucker, Andreas H. (1986). News interviews: a pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
94. Jucker, Andreas H. (1988). The relevance of politeness. Multilingua, 7, 375-84.
95. Kasher, Asa (1986). Politeness and rationality. In Jorgen Dines Johansen & Harley Sonnc (eds.), Pragmatics and linguistics: Festschrift for Jacob L. Mey on his 60th birthday, 30th October 1986, 103-14. Odcnse: Odense University Press.
96. Kasper, Gabriele (1990). Linguistic politeness: current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 193-218.
97. Kasper, Gabriele (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research, 8, 203-31.
98. Kasper, Gabriele (1994). Politeness. In R. E. Asher&J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.), Hie encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Volume 6, 3206-11. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
99. Kasper, Gabriele & Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (eds.) (1993). Interlangnage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. Katriel, Tamar (1986). Talking straight: ‘Dugri’ speech in Israeli ‘Sabra’ culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Kelley, William R. (1987). How to get along with language: a theory of politeness phenomena. Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Part One, The General Session, 181-95.
102. Kemper, Susan & Thissen, David (1981). How polite?: A reply to Clark and Schunk. Cognition, 9, 305-9
103. Kemper, Susan & Thissen, David (1981a). Memory for the dimensions of requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 552-63.
104. Kempson, Ruth (1988). Grammar and conversational principles. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey II. Linguistic theory: extensions and implications, 139-63.
105. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (1992). Les interactions verbales: Tome II. Paris: Armand Colin.
106. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (1994). Les interactions verbales: Tome III. Paris: Armand Colin.
107. Kingwell, Mark (1993). Is it rational to be polite? Journal of Philosophy, 90, 387-404.
108. Kuil'er, Koenraad (1991). Sporting formulae in New Zealand English: two models of male solidarity. In Jenny Cheshire (ed.), English around the world: sociolinguistic perspectives, 200-209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109. Kumar, Ibha & Sah, Prajapati (1994). Why arc we polite? International Journal of Dravidiati Linguistics, 23, 121-9.
110. Lachenicht, L. G. (1980). Aggravating language: a study of abusive and insulting language. Papers in Linguistics, 13, 607-87.
111. Lakoff, Robin (1972). Language in context. Latiyuayc, 48, 907-27.
112. Lakoff, Robin (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your P's and Q's. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292-305.
113. Lakoff, Robin (1977). What you can do with words: politeness, performatives, and pragmatics. In A. Rogers, B. Wall & J.-P. Murray (eds.), On performatives, presuppositions and implicatures, 79-105. Arlington: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
114. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1979). Stylistic strategies within a grammar of style. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327, 53-80.
115. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1989). The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua, 8, 101-29.
116. Lakoff, Robin (1990). Philosophy of language meets the real world; or, when is ‘enough’ enough? Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on the Legacy of Grice, 472-81.
117. Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1988). The social pragmatics of politeness forms. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbcrt Dittmar & Klaus J. Mattheier (eds.), Sociolinguistics: an international handbook of the science of language and society, 1196-1205.
118. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1977). Language and tact. L.A.U.T. Series A, Paper 46.
119. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1980). Explorations in semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
120. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1981). Pragmatics and conversational rhetoric. In Herman Parret, Marina Sbisá & Jef Vcrschucren (eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, 8-14 July 1979, 413-441. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
121. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.
122. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1992). Pragmatic principles in Shaw's Yon Never Can Tell. In Michael Toolan (ed.), Language, text and context: essays in stylistics, p.259-278. London/New York: Routledge.
123. Leech, Geoffrey N, & Thomas, Jenny, (1990). Language, meaning and context: pragmatics. In N. E. Collinge (ed.), An encyclopedia of language, 173-206. London: Routledge.
124. Lee-Wong, Song Mei (1994). Imperatives in requests: director impolite -observations from Chinese. Pragmatics, 4, 491-515.
125. Levinson, Stephen (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
126. Levinson, Stephen (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In Paul Drew & Anthony Wooton (eds.), Erving Cqffinan: exploring the interaction order, 161-227. Oxford: Blackwcll.
127. Maier, Paula (1992). Politeness strategies in business letters by native and non-native English speakers. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 189-205.
128. Mao, Luming Robert (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 451-86.
129. Mathiot, Madeleine, (1982). Review of E. N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 70-73.
130. Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1988). Rcexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403-26.
131. Matsumoto, Yoshiko (1989). Politeness and conversational univcrsals -observations from Japanese. Multilinqua, 8, 207-21.
132. Mccawley, James (1984). Speech acts and Goffman's participant roles. Proceedings of the First Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 260-74.
133. Meier, A. J. (1995). Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 381-92.
134. Mey, Jacob L. (ed.) (1979). Pragmalinguistics: theory and practice. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
135. Mey, Jacob L. (1993a). Pragmatics: an introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
136. Mey, Jacob L., (1993). Pragmatics in the nineties: topics, trends, perspectives. Plenary Talk at the 4th International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan. 30 July 1993.
137. Mey, Jacob L. (1994). Pragmatics. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.), Tlie Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Volume 6, 3260-3278. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
138. Mey, Jacob L., (1994). How to do good things with words: a social pragmatics for survival. Pragmatics, 4, 239-263.
139. De Mey, Sjaak (1994). A new impetus to pragmatics. Studies in Applied Linguistics, 1, 141-64.
140. Moeschler, Jacques (1985). Argumentation et conversation: éléments pour line analyse pragmatique du discours. Paris: Hatier-Crédif.
141. Myers, Greg (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1-35.
142. Nwoye, Onuigbo G. (1989). Linguistic politeness in Igbo. Multilingua, 8, 259-75.
143. Nwoye, Onuigbo G. (1992). Linguistic politeness and sociocultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 309-28.
144. Obilade, Tony (1984). Mother tongue influence on polite communication in a second language. Language and Communication, 4, 295-9.
145. O'Driscoll, Jim (1996). About face: a defence and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 1-32.
146. Oleksy, Wieslaw (ed.) (1989). Contrastive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
147. Parret, Herman, Sbisa, Marina & Verschueren, Jef (eds.) (1981). Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, 8*-14 July 1979. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
148. Pearson, Bethyl (1988). Power and politeness in conversation: encoding of face-threatening acts at church business meetings. Anthropological Linguistics, 30, 68-93.
149. Penman, Robyn (1990). Facework and politeness: multiple goals in courtroom discourse. In Karen Tracy & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Multiple Goals in Discourse, 15-38. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
150. Renkema, Jan (1993). Discourse studies: an introductory textbook. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
151. Sbisa, Marina (1989). Liuguaggio, ragione, interazione: per una teoria pragmatica dcgli atti linguistici. Bologna: II Mulino.
152. Scheerhorn, Dirk R. (1991-1992), Politeness in decisionmaking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 253-273.
153. Schmidt, Richard W. (1980). Review of E. N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction. RELC Journal, 11, 100-14.
154. Schulze, Rainer (1986). Strategic indeterminacy and facework. Studia Anglica Posnanieusia, 19, 75-89.
155. Schulze, Rainer (1987). Persuasive strategies and face-work in impromptu speech. In Kari Sajavaara (ed.), Discourse analysis: openings, 21-49. Reports from the Department of English, University of Jyvaskyla.
156. Scollon, Ron & Suzanne B. K. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
157. Scollon, Ron, Suzanne B. K. (1983). Face in interethnic communication. In Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and Communication, 156-88. London: Longman.
158. Scollon, Ron & Suzanne Wong (1995). Intercultural communication: a discourse approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwcll.
159. Sifianou, Maria (1992). Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: a cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
160. Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana (1986). The concept of politeness and its formulas in the Romanian language. In Joshua A. Fishman, Andrée Tabouret-Keller, Michael Clyne, Bh. Krishnamurti & Mohamed Abdulaziz (eds.), The Fergusonian impact: in honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday, Volume 2: Sociolinguistics and the sociology of language, 35-58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
161. Slugowski, Ben R. & Turnbull, William (1988). Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 101-21.
162. Spencer-Oatey, Helen (1992). Cross-cultural politeness: British and Chinese conceptions of the tutor-student relationship. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Lancaster.
163. Spencer-Oatey, Helen (1993). Conceptions of social relations and pragmatics research. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 27-47.
164. Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
165. Statis, S. (1982). II dialogo: considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Lignori.
166. Strecker, Ivo (1988). Tlie social practice of symbolization: an anthropological analysis. London: Athlone Press.
167. Subbarao, K. V., Agnihotri, R. K. & Mukherjee, A. (1991). Syntactic strategics and politeness phenomena. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 92, 35-53.
168. Tanaka, Shigenori & Kawade, S. (1983). Politeness and second language acquisition. Psychologia, 26, 40-53.
169. Thomas, Jenny (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91-112.
170. Thomas, Jenny (1984). Cross-cultural discourse as ’unequal encounter’: towards a pragmatic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 5, 226-35.
171. Thomas, Jenny (1995). Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
172. Thomason, Richmond H. (1990). Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, 325-63. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: The M.I.T. Press.
173. Ting-Toomy, S. (ed.) (1994). Tlie challenge of face-work: crosscultural and interpersonal issues. New York: University of New York Press.
174. Travis, Charles (1981). Tlie true and the false: the domain of the pragmatic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
175. Trognon, Alain & Ghiglione, Rodolphe (1993). Où va la pragmatique? De la pragmatique à la psychologie sociale. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
176. Turner, Ken (1995). The principal principles of pragmatic inference: co-operation. Language Teaching, 28, 67-76.
177. Turner, Ken (in preparation)’. Wx = D(S,’ H)+P(H, S)+Rx. Verschueren, Jef (ed.) (1991 a). Pragmatics at issue: selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 17-22 August 1987, Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
178. Verschueren, Jef (ed.) (1991&). Levels of linguistic adaptation: selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 17-22 August 1987, Volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
179. Verschueren, Jef & Bertuccelli-Papi, Marcella (eds.) (1987). The pragmatic perspective: selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
180. Wardhaugh, Ronald (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
181. Watts, Richard J. (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 1-17. Berlin: Moucon de Gruyter.
182. Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko & Ehlich, Konrad (1992). Introduction. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice, 1-17. Berlin: Mouton dc Gruyter.
183. Wheeler, Max W. (1994). ‘Politeness’, sociolinguistic theory and language change. Folia LJnguistica Historica, 15, 149-74.
184. Wierzuicka, Anna (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: the semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
185. Wilson, Steven R. Kim, Min-Sun & Meischke, Hendiuka (1991/2). Evaluating Brown and Levinson's politeness theory: a revised analysis of directives and face. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 215-52.
186. Yahya-Othman, Saida (1994). Covering one's social back: politeness among the Swahili. Text, 14, 141-61.
187. Zajdman, Anat (1995). Humorous face-threatening acts: humor as strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 325-39.
188. Zheng, Liman (1993). Footing and speaker intention: a study in interactional linguistics. Papers from the 29th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Volume 1; The Main Session, 493-99.