CAD/CAM-produced surgical guides: Optimizing the treatment workflow;CAD-CAM-gefertigte bohrschablonen: Optimierter behandlungsablauf

International Journal of Computerized Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 93-103

  Neugebauer, Jörg ^a,d   Kistler, Frank ^b   Kistler, Steffen ^b   Zündorf, Gerhard ^c   Freyer, Dirk ^c   Ritter, Lutz ^a   Dreiseidler, Timo ^a   Kusch, Jochen ^c   Zöller, Joachim E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b Private Dental Clinic   (Germany)

^c SICAT Co   (Germany)

^d Zahnärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

3D diagnosis; Cone beam CT; Digital implant planning; Digital workflow; Guided implant placement; Image fusion; Reduced logistics; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WORKFLOW;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WORKFLOW;

EID: 79960187209     PISSN: 14634201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ganz SD. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth. Dentistry today 2008;27:126-127.
2. Neugebauer J, Stachulla G, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Keeve E et al. Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010;7:113-129.
3. Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D. The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:454-474.
4. Angelopoulos C, Aghaloo T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dental clinics of North America 2011;55:141-158.
5. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J, Schlegel KA, Eitner S. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method - a combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II). Journal of craniomaxillo-facial surgery: official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2010;38:488-493.
6. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:207-211. (Pubitemid 47400214)
7. Stein W, Hassfeld S, Brief J, Bertovic I, Krempin R, Mühling J. CT-based 3D-planning for dental implantology. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998;50:137-143. (Pubitemid 128143435)
8. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E, Henne M, Tardieu AL. Computer-assisted implant placement: scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and SAFE system. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:141-149.
9. Kalt G, Gehrke P. Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation. Int J Comput Dent 2008;11:213-225.
10. Ganz SD. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dental clinics of North America 2008;52:777-808.
11. Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Neugebauer J, Kubler AC, Zoller JE. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. International journal of computerized dentistry 2006;9:23-35. (Pubitemid 43494113)
12. Ewers R, Schicho K, Wagner A, Undt G, Seemann R, Figl M et al. Seven years of clinical experience with teleconsultation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1447-1454. (Pubitemid 41355007)
13. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Muller S, Mueller-Lisse UG. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dento maxillo facial radiology 2007;36:198-203. (Pubitemid 46999234)
14. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:551-559.
15. Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Mischkowski R, Zoller JE. Threedimensional diagnostics, planning and implementation in implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2006;9:307-319.
16. Pieper R. Digital impressions-easier than ever. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:47-52.
17. Bindl A, Ritter L, Mehl A. Digital 3-D implant planning: Cerec meets Galileos. Int J Comput Dent 2010;13:221-231.
18. Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Rothamel D, Cizek J, Karapetian VE, Mischkowski RA et al. 3D X-ray meets CAD/CAM dentistry: a novel procedure for virtual dental implant planning. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:29-40.
19. Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Berge SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2010;40(4):341-352.
20. Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Alavi A. The clinical role of fusion imaging using PET, CT, and MR imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America 2010;18:133-149.
21. Schillaci O, Simonetti G. Fusion imaging in nuclear medicine-applications of dual-modality systems in oncology. Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals 2004;19:1-10. (Pubitemid 38352280)
22. Van Assche N, Quirynen M. Tolerance within a surgical guide. Clinical oral implants research 2010;21:455-458.
23. Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Lingohr T, Rothamel D, Mischkowski RA et al. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1191-1199.