Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the mandibular advancement repositioning appliance; A controlled clinical study

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 684-691

  Ghislanzoni, Luis Tomas Huanca ^a   Toll, Douglas Edward ^b   Defraia, Efisio ^a   Baccetti, Tiziano ^a   Franchi, Lorenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b Università degli Studi di Firenze ^*

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Class II malocclusion; Fixed functional appliances

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MUSCLE TRAINING; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; MYOFUNCTIONAL THERAPY; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79960177743     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/111010-656.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Eckhart JE, Toll DE. inventors; Ormco Corporation, assignee, Appliance and method for assisting a patient in maintaining a forward-moving force on the patient's mandibular jaw. US patent 5848891. December 15, 1998.
2. Gonner U, Ozkan V, Jahn E, Toll DE. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68:397-412. (Pubitemid 47470766)
3. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:286-295. (Pubitemid 36875906)
4. Siara-Olds NJ, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger J, Bayirli B. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:18-29.
5. Toll DE, Popovic N, Andjelic J, Drinkuth N. Modified camouflage therapy in an adult Class I patient with TMJ complaints. A case report. J Orofac Orthop. 2010;71:152-162.
6. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:698e1-698e10, 98-99.
7. de Oliveira JN Jr, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Rodrigues de Almeida M, de Oliveira JN. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper Jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:54-62.
8. Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR. Class II nonextraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78:332-338.
9. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:666-672. (Pubitemid 44066023)
10. Kucukkeles N, Ilhan I, Orgun IA. Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the Jasper Jumper. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:449-456.
11. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:352-360. (Pubitemid 44290346)
12. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twinblock appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:128-137. (Pubitemid 36952493)
13. McSherry PF, Bradley H. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod. 2000;27:219-225.
14. Schioth T, von Bremen J, Pancherz H, Ruf S. Complications during Herbst appliance treatment with reduced mandibular cast splints: a prospective, clinical multicenter study. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68:321-327. (Pubitemid 47103880)
15. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119-129. (Pubitemid 41245351)
16. Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:125-137.
17. Du X, Hagg U, Rabie AB. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:167-174.
18. Hägg U, Rabie AB, Bendeus M, et al. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:525-536.
19. Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R. Treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance. World J Orthod. 2008;9:233-243.
20. Halazonetis DJ. Computer-assisted cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:517-521.
21. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39:729-755.
22. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:125-138.
23. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981;51: 115-150.
24. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:449-469.
25. Bjork A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod. 1972; 62:339-383.
26. Hansen K, Koutsonas TG, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:92-103.
27. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:239-246.