Class II non-extraction patients treated with the forsus fatigue resistant device versus intermaxillary elastics

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 332-338

  Jones, Graham ^a   Buschang, Peter H ^b   Kim, Ki Beom ^c   Oliver, Donald R ^c  

^a Baylor College of Dentistry ^*

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Forsus; Intermaxillary elastics; Pitchfork analysis; Treatment out comes

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749122468     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/030607-115.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97-106.
2. Ellen EK, Schneider BJ, Sellke T. A comparative study of anchorage in bioprogressive versus standard edgewise treatment in Class II correction with Intermaxillary elastic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114:430-436.
3. Gianelly AA, Arena SA, Bernstein L. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, and Frankel appliances, Am J Orthod. 1984;86:269-276.
4. Nelson B, Hansen K, Hagg U. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:142-149.
5. Remmer KR, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS, Way DC. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Frankel appliance and the fixed appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:363-372.
6. Adams CD, Meikle MC, Norwick KW, Turpin DL. Dentofacial remodeling produced by Intermaxillary forces In Macaca mulatta. Arch Oral Biol. 1972;17:1519-1535.
7. Hanes RA. Bony profile changes resulting from cervical traction compared with those resulting from Intermaxillary elastics. Am J Orthod. 1959;45:353-364.
8. Brandao M, Pinho HS, Urias D. Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:239-244.
9. Beckwith FR, Ackerman RJ Jr, Cobb CM, Tira DE. An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115:439-447.
10. Skidmore KJ, Brook KJ, Thomson WM, Harding WJ. Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:230-238.
11. Cope JB, Buschang PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blackwood HO 3rd. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy, Angle Orthod. 1994;64:113-122.
12. Covell DA Jr, Trammell DW, Boero RP, West R. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69: 311-320.
13. DeVincenzo J. The Eureka Spring: a new interarch force delivery system. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:454-467.
14. Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:423-442.
15. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 1997;3:232-243.
16. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A, Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 286-295.
17. Stromeyer EL, Caruso JM, DeVincenzo JP. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:203-210.
18. Stucki N, Ingervall B. The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:271-281.
19. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:138-147.
20. Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP, Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance - a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:341-350.
21. Johnston LE Jr. Balancing the books on orthodontic treatment: an integrated analysis of change. Br J Orthod. 1996; 23:93-102.
22. Egolf RJ, BeGole EA, Upshaw HS. Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97: 336-348.
23. Johnston LE Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments. In: Vig PS, Rlbbens KA, eds. Science and Clinical Judgment in Orthodontics. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth; 1986:103-148.
24. Nelson B, Hansen K, Hagg U. Overjet reduction and molar correction in fixed appliance treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusions: sagittal and vertical components. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:13-23.
25. Reddy P, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Parkash H. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118:641-648.
26. Bien SM. Analysis of the components of force used to effect distal movement of teeth. Am J Orthod. 1951;37:508-521.
27. Zingeser M. Vertical response to Class II division 1 therapy, Angle Orthod. 1964;34:58-64.
28. Mannchen R. A critical evaluation of the pitchfork analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:1-14.
29. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:666-672.
30. Helnig N, Goz G. Clinical application and effects of the Forsus spring. A study of a new Herbst hybrid. J Orofac Orthop. 2001;62:436-450.