Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1717, 2011, Pages 2401-2411

  Morris, Douglas W ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Ecology; Evolution; Habitat selection; Mammals; Natural selection

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; FUTURE PROSPECT; HABITAT SELECTION; MAMMAL; NATURAL SELECTION; POPULATION GROWTH; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARVICOLINAE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANADA; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ARVICOLINAE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC FITNESS; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; YUKON TERRITORY;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 79960150948     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0604     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Hoffmann, M. et al. 2010 The impact of conservation on the status of the World's vertebrates. Science 330,1503-1509. (doi:10.1126/science.1194442)
2. Polidoro, B. A. et al. 2010 The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of concern. PLoSONE 5, e10095. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010095)
3. Rands, M. R. W. et al. 2010 Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329, 1298-1303.(doi:10.1126/science.1189138)
4. Pereira, H. M. et al. 2010 Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330, 1496-1501.(doi:10.1126/science.1196624)
5. Pörtner, H. O. & Farrell, A. P. 2008 Physiology and climate change. Science 322, 690-692. (doi:10.1126/science.1163156)
6. Visser, M. E. & Both, C. 2005 Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2561-2569. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3356)
7. Rijnsdorp, A. D., Peck, M. A., Englehard, G. H., Möllmann, C. & Pinnegar, J. K. 2009 Resolving the effect of climate change on fish populations. ICES J. Mar.Sci. 66, 1570-1583. (doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsp056)
8. Day, T. 2005 Modelling the ecological context of evolutionary change: Déjávu or something new? In Ecologicalparadigms lost (eds K. Cuddington & B. Beisner), pp. 273-309. New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. Hairston Jr. N.G., Ellner, S. P., Geber, M.A., Yoshida, T. & Fox, J.A. 2005 Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1114-1127.(doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00812.x)
10. Post, D. M. & Palkovacs, E. P. 2009 Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1629-1640.(doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0012)
11. Pelletier, F., Garant, D. & Hendry, A. P. 2009 Ecoevolutionary dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1483-1489. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0027)
12. Schoener, T. W. 2011 The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331, 426-429. (doi:10.1126/science.1193954)
13. Thompson, J. N. 1998 Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 329-332. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01378-0)
14. Kinnison, M. T. & Hairston Jr, N. G. 2007 Eco-evolutionary conservation biology: contemporary evolutionand the dynamics of persistence. Funct. Ecol. 21,444-454. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01278.x)
15. Agrawal, A. E. 2010 Ecological determinants of mutation load and inbreeding depression in subdivided populations.Am. Nat. 176, 111-122. (doi:10.1086/653672)
16. Pelletier, F., Clutton-Brock, T., Pemberton, J., Tuljapurkar, S. & Coulson, T. 2007 The evolutionarydemography of ecological change: linking trait variation and population growth. Science 315, 1571-1574.(doi:10.1126/science.1139024)
17. Smallegange, I. M. & Coulson, T. 2009 Unifying ecological and evolutionary dynamics through experimental stochastic demography. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 55, 199-205.(doi:10.1560/IJEE.55.3.199)
18. Ozgul, A., Tuljapurkar, S., Benton, T. G., Pemberton, J.M., Clutton-Brock, T. & Coulson, T. 2009 The dynamics of phenotypic change and the shrinking sheep of St. Kilda. Science 325, 464-467. (doi:10.1126/science.1173668)
19. Clarke, J. S. et al. 2001 Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science 293, 657-660. (doi:10.1126/science.293.5530.657)
20. Morris, D. W. 2009 Is evolution contingent or predictable? Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 55, 183-188. (doi:10.1560/IJEE.55.3.183)
21. Morris, D. W. & Lundberg, P. 2011 Pillars of evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22. Gersani, J., Brown, J. S., O'Brien, E. E., Maina, G. M. & Abramsky, Z. 2001 Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. J. Ecol. 89, 660-669. (doi:10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00609.x)
23. Underwood, A. J., Chapman, G. E. & Crowe, T. P. 2004 Identifying and understanding ecological preferences for habitat or prey. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 300, 161-187. (doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2003.12.006)
24. Gaillard, J.-M., Hebblewhite, M., Loison, A., Fuller, M., Powell, R., Basille, M. & Van Mooter, B. 2010 Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metricat a given spatial scale. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365,2255-2265. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0085)
25. Stamps, J. 2009 Habitat selection. In The Princeton guideto ecology (ed. S. A. Levin), pp. 38-44. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Gibiansky, M. L. et al. 2010 Bacteria use Type IV pili towalk upright and detach from surfaces. Science 330, 197.(doi:10.1126/science.1194238)
27. Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A. A. & Nichols, J. D.2001 Dispersal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Davis, J. M. & Stamps, J. A. 2004 The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19,411-416. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.006)
29. Davis, J. M. 2008 Patterns of variation in the influence of natal experience on habitat choice. Quart. Rev. Biol. 83,363-380. (doi:10.1086/592851)
30. Hamilton, I. M. 2010 Foraging theory. In Evolutionary behavioral ecology (eds D. E. Westneat & C. W. Fox),pp. 177-193. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Fretwell, S. D. & Lucas Jr, H. L. 1969 On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 14, 16-36. (doi:10.1007/BF01601953)
32. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1981 A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62, 327-335. (doi:10.2307/1936707)
33. Morris, D. W. 1988 Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol. Ecol. 2, 253-269.(doi:10.1007/BF02214286)
34. Křivan, V., Cressman, R. & Schneier, C. 2008 The ideal free distribution: a review and synthesis of the gametheoretic perspective. Theor. Popul. Biol. 73, 403-425.(doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2007.12.009)
35. Kiester, A. R. & Slatkin, M. 1974 A strategy of movement and resource utilization. Theor. Popul. Biol 6,1-20. (doi:10.1016/0040-5809(74)90028-8)
36. Fletcher Jr, R. J. 2007 Species interaction and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 598-606. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01230.x)
37. Fletcher Jr, R. J. & Sieving, K. E. 2010 Social-informationuse in heterogeneous landscapes: a prospectus.Condor 112, 225-234. (doi:10.1525/cond.2010.090236)
38. Recer, G. M., Blanckenhorn, W. U., Newman, J. A., Tuttle, M. L., Withiam, M. L. & Caraco, T. 1987 Temporal resource variability and the habitat matching rule. Evol. Ecol. 1, 363-378. (doi:10.1007/BF02071559)
39. Hakoyama, H. 2003 The ideal free distribution when the resource is variable. Behav. Ecol. 14, 109-115. (doi:10.1093/beheco/14.1.109)
40. Brown, J. S. 2009 Foraging behavior. In The Princetonguide to ecology (ed. S. A. Levin), pp. 51-58. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Tregenza, T. 1995 Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv. Ecol. Res. 26, 253-302. (doi:10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60067-7)
42. Pettorelli, N., Gaillard, J.-M., Van Laere, G., Duncan, P., Kjellander, P., Liberg, O., Delorme, D. & Maillard, D.2002 Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 747-753. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1791)
43. Pettorelli, N., Gaillard, J.-M., Duncan, P., Ouellet, J.-P. and Van Laere, G. 2001 Population density and small-scale variation in habitat quality affect phenotypic quality in roe deer. Oecologia 128, 400-405. (doi:10.1007/s004420100682)
44. Jones, O. R., Pilkington, J. G. & Crawley, M. J. 2006 Distribution of a naturally fluctuating ungulate population among heterogeneous plant communities: ideal andfree? J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 1387-1392. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01163.x)
45. Griffen, B. D. 2009 Consumers that are not 'ideal' or 'free' can still approach the ideal free distribution using simple patch-leaving rules. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 919-927.(doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01571.x)
46. Morris, D. W., Davidson, D. L. & Krebs, C. J. 2000 Measuring the ghost of competition: insights from density-dependent habitat selection on the coexistence and dynamics of lemmings. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2, 41-67.
47. Pulliam, H. R. 1988 Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 34, 1222-1242.
48. Morris, D. W. 1994 Habitat matching: alternatives and implications to populations and communities. Evol.Ecol. 8, 387-406. (doi:10.1007/BF01238190)
49. Rodenhouse, N. L., Sheery, T. W. & Holmes, R. T. 1997 Site-dependent regulation of population size: a new synthesis. Ecology 78, 2025-2042.
50. McPeek, M. A., Rodenhouse, N. L., Holmes, R. T. & Sherry, T. W. 2001 A general model of site-dependent population regulation: population-level regulation with out individual-level interactions. Oikos 94, 417-424.(doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.940304.x)
51. Morris, D. W. 2003 Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136, 1-13. (doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1241-4)
52. Hassell, M. P. & Varley, G. C. 1969 New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223, 1133-1136. (doi:10.1038/2231133a0)
53. Sutherland, W. J. 1983 Aggregation and the 'ideal-free'distribution. J. Anim. Ecol. 52, 821-828. (doi:10.2307/4456)
54. Fagen, R. 1987 A generalized habitat matching rule. Evol. Ecol. 1, 5-10. (doi:10.1007/BF02067264)
55. Milinski, M. & Parker, G. A. 1991 Competition for resources. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach(eds J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 137-168, 3rd edn.Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.
56. Pulliam, H. R. & Danielson, B. J. 1991 Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137, S50-S66. (doi:10.1086/285139)
57. Holt, R. D. 2003 On the evolutionary ecology of species'ranges. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5, 159-178.
58. Jonzén, N., Wilcox, C. & Possingham, H. P. 2004 Habitat selection and population regulation in temporally fluctuating environments. Am. Nat. 164, E103-E114.(doi:10.1086/424532)
59. Hirzel, A. H. 2008 Using relative capacity to measure habitat suitability. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 421-434. (doi:10.1560/IJEE.54.3-4.421)
60. Knight, T. W. & Morris, D. W. 1996 How many habitats do landscapes contain? Ecology 77, 1756-1764. (doi:10.2307/2265781)
61. Morris, D. W. & MacEachern, J. T. 2010 Sexual conflict over habitat selection: the game and a test with small mammals. Evol. Ecol. Res. 12, 507-522.
62. Johnson, D. H. 1980 The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65-71. (doi:10.2307/1937156)
63. Morris, D. W. 1987 Ecological scale and habitat use. Ecology 68, 362-369. (doi:10.2307/1939267)
64. Fortin, D., Morris, D. W. & McLoughlin, P. D.2008 Adaptive habitat selection and the evolution ofs pecialists and generalists in heterogeneous environments. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 311-328. (doi:10.1560/IJEE.54.3-4.311)
65. McLoughlin, P. D., Morris, D. W., Fotin, D., Vanderwall, E. & Contasti, A. 2010 Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 4-12.(doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01613.x)
66. Holt, R. D. & Gaines, M. S. 1992 Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evol. Ecol. 6, 433-447.(doi:10.1007/BF02270702)
67. Kawecki, T. J., Baton, N. H. & Fry, J. D. 1997 Mutational collapse in marginal habitats and the evolution ofecological specialization. J. Evol. Biol. 10, 407-429.(doi:10.1007/s000360050032)
68. Kawecki, T. J. & Ebert, D. 2004 Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1225-1241. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x)
69. Cohen, D. 2006 Modeling the evolutionary and ecological consequences of selection and adaptation inheterogeneous environments. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 52,467-484. (doi:10.1560/IJEE_52_3-4_467)
70. Levins, R. 1962 Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment, I. The fitness set and adaptive function. Am. Nat. 96, 361-378. (doi:10.1086/282245)
71. Brown, J. S. & Pavlovic, N. B. 1992 Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat specialization. Evol. Ecol. 6, 360-382. (doi:10.1007/BF02270698)
72. Morris, D. W. 1992 Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. Evol. Ecol. 6, 412-432.(doi:10.1007/BF02270701)
73. Nachman, M. W., Hoekstra, H. E. & D'Agostino, S. L.2003 The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5268-5273.(doi:10.1073/pnas.0431157100)
74. Hoekstra, H. E., Hirschmann, R. J., Bundey, R. J., Insel, P. & Crossland, J. P. 2006 A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive color pattern in beach mice. Science 313,101-104. (doi:10.1126/science.1126121)
75. Mullen, L.M., Vignieri, S.N., Gore, J. A. & Hoekstra, H.E.2009 Adaptive basis of geographic variation: genetic, phenotypic and environmental differentiation among beach mouse populations. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 3809-3818.(doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1146)
76. Vignieri, S. N., Larson, J. G. & Hoekstra, H. E. 2010 The selective advantage of crypsis in mice. Evolution 64,2153-2158. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00976.x)
77. Hoekstra, H. E., Krenz, J. G. & Nachman, M. W. Local adaptation in the rock pocket mouse (Chaetodipusintermdius): natural selection and phylogenetic history of populations. Heredity 94, 217-228. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800600)
78. Hoekstra, H. E., Drumm, K. E. & Nachman, M. W.2004 Ecological genetics of coat color variation in pocket mice: geographic variation in selected and neutralgenes. Evolution 58, 1329-1341.
79. Brown, J. S. 1998 Game theory and habitat selection. In Game theory and animal behavior (eds L. A. Dugatkin &H. K. Reeve), pp. 188-220. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
80. Vincent, T. L. & Brown, J. S. 2005 Evolutionary game theory, natural selection, and Darwinian dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81. Holt, R. D. 2006 Emergent neutrality. Trends Ecol. Evol.21, 531-533. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.003)
82. Cressman, R. & Křivan, V. 2010 The ideal free distribution as an evolutionarily stable state in density-dependent population games. Oikos 119, 1231-1242. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.17845.x)
83. Morris, D. W. 2003 Shadows of predation: habitat-selecting consumers eclipse competition between coexisting prey. Evol. Ecol. 17, 393-422. (doi:10.1023/A:1027304601301)
84. Morris, D. W. 2004 Some crucial consequences of adaptive habitat selection by predators and prey: apparent mutualisms, competitive ghosts, habitat abandonment, and spatial structure. Isr. J. Zool. 50, 207-232. (doi:10.1560/X4AH-6REB-YKEY-E45Q)
85. Abrams, P. A., Cressman, R. & Křivan, V. 2007 The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. Am. Nat. 169, 505-518.(doi:10.1086/511963)
86. Apaloo, J., Brown, J. S. & Vincent, T. L. 2009 Evolutionary game theory: ESS, convergence stability, and NIS. Evol. Ecol. Res. 11, 489-515.
87. Morris, D. W., Moore, D. E., Ale, S. B. & Dupuch, A.2010 Forecasting ecological and evolutionary strategies to global change: an example from habitat selection bylemmings. Global Change Biol. 17, 1266-1276. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02305.x)
88. Krebs, C. J. 2011 Of lemmings and snowshoe hares: the ecology of northern Canada. Proc. R. Soc. B. 278,481-489. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1992)
89. Haila, Y., Nicholls, A. O., Hanski, I. K. & Raivio, S.1996 Stochasti city in bird habitat selection: year to-year changes in territory locations in a boreal forest bird assemblage. Oikos 76, 536-552. (doi:10.2307/3546347)
90. Campbell, S. P., Witham, J. W. & Hunter Jr, M. L. 2010 Stochasticity as an alternative to deterministic explanations for patterns of habitat use by birds. Ecol.Monogr. 80, 287-302. (doi:10.1890/08-2366.1)
91. Storch, D. & Frynta, D. 1999 Evolution of habitat selection: stochastic acquisition of cognitive clues? Evol. Ecol.13, 591-600. (doi:10.1023/A:1006765422475)
92. Jonzén, N., Rhodes, J. R. & Possingham, H. P. 2005 Trend detection in source-sink systems: when should sink habitats be monitored? Ecol. Appl. 15, 326-334.(doi:10.1890/03-5168)
93. Tuljapurkar, S., Gaillard, J.-M. & Coulson, T. 2009 From stochastic environments to life histories and back. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1499-1509. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0021)
94. Morris, D. W. & Mukherjee, S. 2006 Simulated and human meta populations created by habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 1263-1275.
95. Knight, T. W., Morris, D. W. & Haedrich, R. L. 2008 Inferring competitive behavior from population census and habitat data. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 345-359.(doi:10.1560/IJEE.54.3-4.345)
96. Ale, S. B., Morris, D. W., Dupuch, A. & Moore, D. E.2011 Habitat selection and the scale of ghostly coexistence among Arctic rodents. Oikos. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18933.x)
97. Morris, D. W., Fox, B. J., Luo, J. & Monamy, V. 2000 Habitat-dependent competition and the coexistence ofAustralian heathland rodents. Oikos 91, 294-306. (doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910210.x)