The ideal free distribution when the resource is variable

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 109-115

  Hakoyama, Hiroshi ^a  

^a FISHERIES RESEARCH AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Continuous input condition; Ideal free distribution; Resource variability; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; RESOURCE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037284212     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/14.1.109     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abrahams MV, 1986. Patch choice under perceptual constraints: a cause for departures from an ideal free distribution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:409-415.
2. Abramowitz M, Stegun I, 1972. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover.
3. Caraco T, Martindale S, Whitham TS, 1980. An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim Behav 28:820-830.
4. Earn DJD,Johnstone RA, 1997. A systematic error in tests of ideal free theory. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1671-1675.
5. Fausch KD, 1984. Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Can J Zool 62:441-451.
6. Fretwell SD, 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
7. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL, 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16-36.
8. Hakoyama H, Iguchi K, 1997. The information of food distribution realizes an ideal free distribution: support of perceptual limitation. J Ethol 15:69-78.
9. Hakoyama H, Iguchi K, 2001. Transition from a random to an ideal free to an ideal despotic distribution: the effects of individual difference in growth. J Ethol 19:123-131.
10. Harley C, 1981. Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. J Theor Biol 89:611-633.
11. Hoel PG, 1971. Introduction to mathematical statistics, 4th ed. New York: John Wiley.
12. Houston AI, McNamara JM, 1988. The ideal free distribution when competitive abilities differ: an approach based on statistical mechanics. Anim Behav 36:166-174.
13. Houston AI, McNamara JM, 1997. Patch choice and population size. Evol Ecol 11:703-722.
14. Houston AI, McNamara JM, 1998. Switching between resources and the ideal free distribution. Anim Behav 35:301-302.
15. Houston AI, McNamara JM, Milinski M, 1995. The distribution of animals between resources: a compromise between equal numbers and equal intake rates. Anim Behav 49:248-251.
16. Humphries S, Ruxton GD, Metcalfe NB, 1999. Patch choice and risk: relative competitive ability is context dependent. Anim Behav 58:1131-1138.
17. Kacelnik A, Krebs JR, Bernstein C, 1992. The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends Ecol Evol 7:50-55.
18. Maynard Smith J, 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Milinski M, 1979. An evolutionarily stable feeding strategy in sticklebacks. Z Tierpsychol 51:36-40.
20. Milinski M, 1994. Long-term memory for food patches and implications for ideal free distributions in sticklebacks. Ecology 75:1150-1156.
21. Parker GA, Sutherland WJ, 1986. Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim Behav 34:1222-1242.
22. Recer GM, Blanckenhorn WU, Newman JA, Tuttle ML, Withiam ML, Caraco T, 1987. Temporal resource variability and the habitat-matching rule. Evol Ecol 1:363-378.
23. Regelmann K, 1984. Competitive resource sharing: a simulation model. Anim Behav 32:226-232.
24. Sutherland WJ, 1983. Aggregation and the 'ideal free' distribution. J Anim Ecol 52:821-828.
25. Tregenza T, 1994. Common misconceptions in applying the ideal free distribution. Anim Behav 47:485-487.