Social-information use in heterogeneous landscapes: A prospectus

Condor

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 225-234

  Fletcher Jr , Robert J ^a   Sieving, Kathryn E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conspecific attraction; Habitat fragmentation; Habitat loss; Inadvertent social information; Key words: connectivity; Landscape ecology; Patch size; Public information

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; AVES; DOLICHONYX; DOLICHONYX ORYZIVORUS;

EID: 77953402382     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2010.090236     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. ARMSWORTH, P. R., AND J. E. ROUGHGARDEN. 2005. The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. American Naturalist 165:449-465.
2. BAGUETTE, M., AND H. VAN DYCK. 2007. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecology 22:1117-1129.
3. BEAUCHAMP, G., M. BELISLE, AND L.-A. GIRALDEAU. 1997. Influence of conspecific attraction on the spatial distribution of learning foragers in a patchy habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:671-682.
4. BÉLISLE, M. 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86:1988-1995.
5. BÉLISLE, M., A. DESROCHERS, AND M. J. FORTIN. 2001. Influence of forest cover on the movements of forest birds: a homing experiment. Ecology 82:1893-1904.
6. BETTS, M. G., A. S. HADLEY, N. RODENHOUSE, AND J. J. NOCERA. 2008. Social information trumps vegetation structure in breedingsite selection by a migrant songbird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275:2257-2263.
7. BOLLINGER, E. K., AND T. A. GAVI N. 1989. The effects of site quality on breeding-site fidelity in Bobolinks. Auk 106:584-594.
8. BOLLINGER, E. K., P. B. BOLLINGER, AND T. A. GAVI N. 1990. Effects of hay-cropping on eastern populations of the Bobolink. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:142-150.
9. BOURQUE, J., AND A. DESROCHERS. 2006. Spatial aggregation of forest songbird territories and possible implications for area sensitivity. Avian Conservation and Ecology 1:3.
10. CASTELLÓN, T. D., AND K. E. SIEVING. 2006. An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conservation Biology 20:135-145.
11. CASTELLÓN, T. D., AND K. E. SIEVING. 2007. Patch network criteria for dispersal-limited endemic birds of South American temperate rain forest. Ecological Applications 17:2152-2163.
12. DALL, S. R. X. 2005. Defining the concept of public information. Science 308:353-354.
13. DALL, S. R. X., L.-A. GIRALDEAU, O. OLSSON, J. M. MCNAMARA, AND D. W. STEPHENS. 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:187-193.
14. DANCHIN, E., L. A. GIRALDEAU, AND F. CEZILLY. 2008. Behavioural ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
15. DANCHIN, E., L.-A. GIRALDEAU, T. J. VALONE, AND R. H. WAGNER. 2004. Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487-491.
16. DANCHIN, E., L.-A. GIRALDEAU, T. J. VALONE, AND R. H. WAGNER. 2005. Defining the concept of public information-response. Science 308:355-356.
17. DOLBY, A. S., AND T. C. GRUBB. 1998. Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis. Animal Behaviour 56:501-509.
18. DOLIGEZ, B., E. DANCHIN, AND J. CLOBERT. 2002. Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297:1168-1170.
19. DOLIGEZ, B., C. CADET, E. DANCHIN, AND T. BOULINIER. 2003. When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence. Animal Behaviour 66:973-988.
20. DOLIGEZ, B., T. PART, E. DANCHIN, J. CLOBERT, AND L. GUSTAFSSON. 2004. Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the Collared Flycatcher. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:75-87.
21. FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC, E. 2002. Nested patterns of species distribution and winter flock occurrence of insectivorous birds in a fragmented landscape. Ecoscience 9:450-458.
22. FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC, E., A. KACELNIK. 2004. Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quality and quantity of social information at different neighbour distances. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:502-511.
23. FERRAZ, G., J. D. NICHOLS, J. E. HINES, P. C. STOUFFER, R. O. BIERREGAARD, AND T. E. LOVEJOY. 2007. A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science 315:238-241.
24. FLETCHER, R. J. JR. 2006. Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 168:207-219.
25. FLETCHER, R. J. JR. 2007. Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:598-606.
26. FLETCHER, R. J. JR. 2008. Social information and community dynamics: nontarget effects from simulating social cues for management. Ecological Applications 18:1764-1773.
27. FLETCHER, R. J. JR. 2009. Does attraction to conspecifics explain the patch-size effect? An experimental test. Oikos 118:1139-1147.
28. FLETCHER, R. J. JR., AND R. R. KOFORD. 2003. Spatial responses of Bobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) near different types of edges in northern Iowa. Auk 120:799-810.
29. FLETCHER, R. J. JR., AND R. L. HUTTO. 2008. Partitioning the multiscale effects of human activity on the occurrence of riparian forest birds. Landscape Ecology 23:727-739.
30. FLETCHER, R. J. JR., AND C. W. MILLER. 2008. The type and timing of social information alters offspring production. Biology Letters 4:482-485.
31. FORSMAN, J. T., J. T. SEPPÄNEN, AND M. MÖNKKÖNEN. 2002. Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1619-1623.
32. FORSMAN, J. T., M. MÖNKKÖNEN, P. HELLE, AND J. INKEROINEN. 1998. Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest. Oecologia 115:278-286.
33. FORSMAN, J. T., M. B. HJERNQUIST, J. TAIPALE, AND L. GUSTAFSSON. 2008. Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions. Behavioral Ecology 19:539-545.
34. GATES, J. E., AND L. W. GYSEL. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59:871-883.
35. GETTY, T. 1995. Search, discrimination, and selection: mate choice by Pied Flycatchers. American Naturalist 145:146-154.
36. GIRALDEAU, L.-A., T. J. VALONE, AND J. J. TEMPLETON. 2002. Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357:1559-1566.
37. GOULD, J. P. 1974. Risk, stochastic preference, and the value of information. Journal of Economic Theory 8:64-84.
38. HAHN, B. A., AND E. D. SILVERMAN. 2006. Social cues facilitate habitat selection: American Redstarts establish breeding territories in response to song. Biology Letters 2:337-340.
39. HAYDON, D. T., J. M. MORALES, A. YOTT, D. A. JENKINS, R. ROSATTE, AND J. M. FRYXELL. 2008. Socially informed random walks: incorporating group dynamics into models of population spread and growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275:1101-1109.
40. HERKERT, J. R. 1994. The effects of habitat fragmentation on midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecological Applications 4:461-471.
41. JOHNSON, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65-71.
42. JOHNSON, D. H., AND L. D. IGL. 2001. Area requirements of grassland birds: a regional perspective. Auk 118:24-34.
43. KOOPS, M. A. 2004. Reliability and the value of information. Animal Behaviour 67:103-111.
44. KREBS, J. R. 1976. Bird song and territory defence. New Scientist 70:534-536.
45. LANGHAM, G. M., T. A. CONTRERAS, AND K. E. SIEVING. 2006. Why pishing works: titmouse (Paridae) scolds elicit a generalized response in bird communities. Ecoscience 13:485-496.
46. LI, H., AND J. F. REYNOLDS. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73:280-284.
47. LIMA, S. L., AND P. A. ZOLLNER. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:131-135.
48. MÖNKKÖNEN, M., P. HELLE, AND K. SOPPELA. 1990. Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.) : heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia 85:218-225.
49. MÖNKKÖNEN, M., P. HELLE, G. J. NIEMI, AND K. MONTGOMERY. 1997. Heterospecific attraction affects community structure and migrant abundances in northern breeding bird communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75:2077-2083.
50. MÖNKKÖNEN, M., R. HARDLING, J. T. FORSMAN, AND J. TUOMI. 1999. Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection. Evolutionary Ecology 13:91-104.
51. NOCERA, J. J., G. J. FORBES, AND L.-A. GIRALDEAU. 2006. Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273:349-355.
52. NOCERA, J. J., G. J. FORBES, AND L.-A. GIRALDEAU. 2009. Aggregations from using inadvertent social information: a form of ideal habitat selection. Ecography 32:143-152.
53. PARKER, M. W., S. W. KRESS, R. T. GOLIGHTLY, H. R. CARTER, E. B. PARSONS, S. E. SCHUBEL, J. A. BOYCE, G. J. MCCHESNEY, AND S. M. WISELY. 2007. Assessment of social attraction techniques used to restore a Common Murre colony in central California. Waterbirds 30:17-28.
54. REED, J. M., AND A. P. DOBSON. 1993. Behavioral constraints and conservation biology: conspecific attraction and recruitment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:253-256.
55. RENFREW, R. B., C. A. RIBIC, AND J. L. NACK. 2005. Edge avoidance by nesting grassland birds: a futile strategy in a fragmented landscape. Auk 122:618-636.
56. REVILLA, E., T. WIEGAND, F. PALOMARES, P. FERRERAS, AND M. DELIBES. 2004. Effects of matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: from individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters. American Naturalist 164:E130-E153.
57. ROBBINS, C. S., D. K. DAWSON, AND B. A. DOWELL. 1989. Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic states. Wildlife Monographs:1-34.
58. ROBERTSON, B. A., AND R. L. HUTTO. 2006. A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87:1075-1085.
59. ROBINSON, S. K., F. R. THOMPSON, T. M. DONOVAN, D. R. WHITEHEAD, AND J. FAABORG. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987-1990.
60. RODEWALD, A. D., AND R. H. YAHNER. 2001. Influence of landscape composition on avian community structure and associated mechanisms. Ecology 82:3493-3504.
61. SCHLAEPFER, M. A., M. C. RUNGE, AND P. W. SHERMAN. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:474-480.
62. SCHMIDT, K. A. 2001. Site fidelity in habitats with contrasting levels of nest predation and brood parasitism. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:633-648.
63. SEPPÄNEN, J. T., J. T. FORSMAN, M. MÖNKKÖNEN, AND R. L. THOMSON. 2007. Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88:1622-1633.
64. SIEVING, K. E., M. F. WILLSON, AND T. L. DE SANTO. 2000. Defining corridor functions for endemic birds in fragmented southtemperate rainforest. Conservation Biology 14:1120-1132.
65. SIEVING, K. E., T. A. CONTRERAS, AND K. L. MAUTE. 2004. Heterospecific facilitation of forest-boundary crossing by mobbing understory birds in north-central Florida. Auk 121:738-751.
66. SIEVING, K. E., S. A. HETRICK, AND M. L. AVERY. 2010. The versatility of graded acoustic measures in classification of predation threats by the Tufted Titmouse Baeolophus bicolor: exploring a mixed framework for threat communication. Oikos 119:264-276.
67. STAMPS, J. A. 1988. Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. American Naturalist 131:329-347.
68. STAMPS, J. A. 1991. The effect of conspecifics on habitat selection in territorial species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28:29-36.
69. STEPHENS, D. W. 1989. Variance and the value of information. American Naturalist 134:128-140.
70. SWANSON, E. M., S. M. TEKMEN, AND M. A. BEE. 2007. Do female frogs exploit inadvertent social information to locate breeding aggregations? Canadian Journal of Zoology 85:921-932.
71. THOMSON, R. L., J. T. FORSMAN, AND M. MÖNKKÖNEN. 2003. Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis. Oecologia 134:431-438.
72. TURCHIN, P. 1989. Population consequences of aggregative movement. Journal of Animal Ecology 58:75-100.
73. VERNER, J. 1992. Data needs for conservation biology: have we avoided critical research? Condor 94:301-303.
74. WARD, M. P., AND S. SCHLOSSBERG. 2004. Conspecific attraction and the conservation of territorial songbirds. Conservation Biology 18:519-525.
75. WIEGAND, T., K. A. MOLONEY, J. NAVES, AND F. KNAUER. 1999. Finding the missing link between landscape structure and population dynamics: a spatially explicit perspective. American Naturalist 154:605-627.
76. WILEY, R. H. 1994. Errors, exaggeration, and deception in animal communication, p. 157-189. In L. Real [ED.], Behavioral mechanisms in ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
77. WINFREE, R., J. DUSHOFF, E. E. CRONE, C. B. SCHULTZ, R. V. BUDNY, N. M. WILLIAMS, AND C. KREMEN. 2005. Testing simple indices of habitat proximity. American Naturalist 165:707-717.
78. ZOLLNER, P. A. 2000. Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15:523-533.