Participation of people with acquired brain injury: Insiders perspectives

Brain Injury

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 832-843

  Schipper, Karen ^a,b   Visser Meily, Johanna M A ^c   Hendrikx, Annette ^a   Abma, Tineke A ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Reinaerde   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acquired brain injury; Participation; Patient perspectives; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BRAIN INJURY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODEL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 79960108851     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: 1362301X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2011.589796     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Campen C, Iedema J. Are persons with physical disabilities who participate in society healthier and happier? Structural equation modelling of objective participation and subjective well-being. Quality of Life Research 2007;16:635-645. (Pubitemid 46474945)
2. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whitneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and rehabilitation 2008;30:1445-1460.
3. Rasquin SM, Bouwens SF, Dijcks B, Winkens I, Bakx WG, van Heugten CM. Effectiveness of a low intensity outpatient cognitive rehabilitation programme for patients in the chronic phase after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological rehabilitation 2010;20:760-777.
4. Trexler LE, Trexler LC, Malec JF, Klyce D, Parrott D. Prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation on community particpation and vocational outcome following brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010;25:440-446.
5. WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2002. p 10.
6. Fries W, Fischer S. Participation limitations following acquired brain damage: A pilot study on the relationship among functional disorders as well as personal and environmental context factors. Rehabilitation 2008;47:265-274.
7. Van Regenmortel T. Empowerment as challenging framework for social inclusion and modern care. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice 2009;18:22-24.
8. Wermer MJH, Kool H, Albrecht KW, Rinkel GJE. Subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with clipping: Long-term effects on employment, relationships, personality, and mood. Neurosurgery 2007;60:91-98.
9. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2007;29:559-566. (Pubitemid 46534746)
10. Dalemans RJP, de Witte L, van den Heuvel W, Wade D. A description of social participation in working age people with aphasia: A review of the literature. Aphasiology 2008;22: 1071-1091.
11. Abma T, Nierse CJ, Widdershoven GAM. Patients as partners in responsive research: Methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research 2009;19:401-415.
12. Oliver M. Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap & Society 1992;7: 101-114.
13. Abma TA, Broerse J. Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas. Health Expectations 2010;13: 160-173.
14. Meadows LM, Morse JM. Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In: Morse JM, Swanson JM, Kuzel AJ, editors. The nature of qualitative evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001. pp 187-201.
15. Lieblich AR, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T. Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
16. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2008;337: 687-689.
17. Guba EG, Lincoln Y. Fourth generation evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1989.
18. Huberman A, Miles M. Data management and analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
19. Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: A qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilation Medicine 2008;40:89-95. (Pubitemid 351403992)
20. Verkerk MA. The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine Health Care & Philosophy 2001;4:289-294.
21. Schipper K, Widdershoven GAM, Abma TA. Citizenship and autonomy in acquired brain injury. Nursing Ethics In press.
22. Yasuda S, Wehman P, Targett P, Cifu D, West M. Return to work for persons with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2001;80: 852-864.
23. ONeill JH, Zuger RR, Fields A, Fraser R, Pruce T. The program, without walls: Innovative approach to state agency vocational rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical and Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004;85:68-72.
24. Oeseburg B, Abma TA. Care as a mutual endeavour: Experiences of a multiple sclerosis patient and her healthcare professionals. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2006;9: 349-357.
25. Abma TA, Oeseburg B, Widdershoven GA, Goldsteen M, Verkerk MA. Two women with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers: Conflicting normative expectations. Nursing Ethics 2005;12:479-492. (Pubitemid 41329598)
26. Van der Zee C, Priesterbach A, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers V, Visser-Meily J, Post M. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale and the USER-P. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2010;42:752-757.
27. Minkman M, Schouten L, Huijsman R, Van Splunteren P. Integrated care for patients with a stroke in the Netherlands. Results and experiences from a national Breakthrough Collaborative Improvement project. International Journal on integrated Care 2005;5:e14.
28. Van Exel J, Koopmanschap MA, van Wijngaarden JDH, Scholte op Reimer WJM. Costs of stroke and stroke services: Determinants of patient costs and a comparison of costs of regular care and care organised in stroke services. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2003;1:2 doi:10.1186/ 1478-7547-1-2.
29. Vrijhoef HJM, Wagner EH. Fragmentation of chronic care: A call for clarity. International Journal of Integrated Care 2009;9.
30. Abma TA, Stake RE. Stakes responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution. New Directions for Evaluation 2001;92:7-21.
31. Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, Kirwan J. Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheumatism 2006;55:676-680. (Pubitemid 44289891)
32. Schipper K, Abma TA, van Zadelhoff E, van de Griendt J, Nierse C, Widdershoven GAM. What does it mean to be a patient research partner? An ethnodrama. Qualitative Inquiry 2010;16:501-510.
33. McClean S, Shaw A. From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge- An exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research 2005;15:729-749. (Pubitemid 41363605)
34. Nierse CJ, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E, Van de Griendt J, Abma TA. Collaboration and co-ownership in research. Dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expectations 2011; doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x.
35. Willems V. Reïntegratie na niet aangeboren hersenletsel: Een kwestie van vallen en opstaan. (Re-integration after ABI: Its all about going on). Attent 2010;3:5.