Two women with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers: Conflicting normative expectations

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 479-492

  Abma, Tineke A ^a   Oeseburg, Barth ^b   Widdershoven, Guy A M ^a   Goldsteen, Minke ^a   Verkerk, Marian A ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Multiple sclerosis; Narratives; Normative expectations; Responsibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE REPORT; DISABLED PERSON; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NETHERLANDS; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NARRATION; NETHERLANDS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 24944523636     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733005ne816oa     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kraft GH. Rehabilitation still the only way to improve function in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1999; 354: 2016-17.
2. Boeije HR, Duijnstee MS, Grypdonck MH, Pool A. Encountering the downward phase: biographical work in people with multiple sclerosis living at home. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 881-93.
3. Charmaz K. Good days, bad days: the self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991.
4. Struhkamp R. Dealing with disability: inquiries into a clinical craft [Thesis]. Enschede: Technical University Twente, 2004.
5. Rothman AA, Wagner EH. Chronic illness management: what is the role of primary care? Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 256-61.
6. Walker MU. Moral understandings. New York: Routledge, 1998.
7. Stake RE, Trumball D. Naturalistic generalizations. Rev J Philos Soc Sci 1982; 1(2): 1-12.
8. Abma TA, Stake RE. Responsive evaluation, roots and evolution. New Directions for Evaluation 2001; (92 winter): 7-22.
9. Walker MU. Morality in practice: a response to Claudia Card and Lorraine Code. Hypatia 2002; 17: 174-82.
10. Tronto J. Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge, 1993.
11. Goldsteen M, Abma TA, Oeseburg B, Verkerk MA, Widdershoven GAM. What it means to be a daughter. Bioethics 2004, in press.
12. Stake RE. Case studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. eds. The handbook for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1994: 236-47.
13. Reissman CK. Narrative analysis. (Qualitative research methods series 30.) Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1993.
14. Larson CL. Re-presenting the subject: problems in personal narrative inquiry. Qualitative Studies in Education 1997; 10: 455-70.
15. Lieblich A, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T. Narrative analysis: reading, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998.
16. Schwandt TS. On understanding understanding. Qualitative Inquiry 1999; 5: 451-64.
17. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 1985.
18. Meadows LM, Morse JM. Constructing evidence within a qualitative project. In: Morse JM, Swanson JM, Kuzel AJ eds. The nature of qualitative evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2001: 187-201.
19. Murphy R. The body silent. New York: Norton, 1987.
20. Olivier M. The politics of disablement. London: MacMillan, 1990.
21. Shakespeare T. ed. The disability reader. London: Cassell, 1998.
22. Widdershoven GAM. Ethiek in de kliniek. (Clinical Ethics.) Amsterdam: Boom, 2000.
23. Verkerk MA. The care perspective and autonomy. Med Health Care Philos 2001; 4: 289-94.
24. Thorne S, Paterson B. Shifting images of chronic illness. Image J Nurs Sch 1998; 30: 173-78.
25. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992; 267: 2221-26.
26. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 329-39.
27. Verkerk MA. Zorgethiek: naar een geografie van verantwoordelijkheden. (Ethics of care: a geography of responsibilities.) In: Manschot HAM, Dartel H van eds. In gesprek over goede zorg. (Conversations about good care.) Amsterdam/Meppel: Uitgeverij Boom, 2003: 177-90.
28. Schneider GW, Snell L. CARE: an approach for teaching ethics in medicine. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1563-67.
29. Nussbaum M. The fragility of goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
30. Koch T. 'Having a say': negotiation in fourth generation evaluation. J Adv Nurs 2000, 31: 117-25.