Enriched contact finite elements for stable peeling computations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 593-616

  Sauer, Roger A ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Computational contact mechanics; Enhanced finite elements; Nonlinear finite element methods; Peeling

Indexed keywords

COARSE MESHES; COMPUTATIONAL CONTACT MECHANICS; CONTACT ELEMENTS; ELASTIC STRIPS; ENHANCED FINITE ELEMENTS; ENRICHMENT TECHNIQUES; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATIONS; MESH REFINEMENT; NON-LINEAR FE; NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NUMBER OF DEGREES OF FREEDOM; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; STABLE SOLUTIONS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

MECHANICS;

EID: 79960090528     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.3126     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wei Y, Hutchinson JW. Interface strength, work of adhesion and plasticity in the peel test. International Journal of Fracture 1998; 93:315-333.
2. Crisfield MA, Alfano G. Adaptive hierarchical enrichment for delamination fracture using a decohesive zone model. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 54(9):1369-1390.
3. Diehl T. On using a penalty-based cohesive-zone finite element approach, part I: elastic solution benchmarks. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 2008; 28:237-255.
4. Lorenzis LD, Zavarise G. Modeling of mixed mode debonding in the peel test applied to superficial reinforcements. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2008; 45:5419-5436.
5. Puso MA, Laursen TA, Solberg J. A segment-to-segment mortar contact method for quadratic elements and large deformations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197:555-566.
6. Simo JC, Armero F. Geometrically non-linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1992; 33:1413-1449.
7. Belytschko T, Moes N, Usui S, Parimi C. Arbitrary discontinuities in finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 50:993-1013.
8. Laursen TA. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics: Fundamentals of Modeling Interfacial Phenomena in Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Springer: Berlin, 2002.
9. Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics (2nd edn). Springer: Berlin, 2006.
10. Sauer RA, Li S. A contact mechanics model for quasi-continua. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 71(8):931-962.
11. Hansson E, Klarbring A. Rigid contact modelled by CAD surface. Engineering Computations 1990; 7:344-348.
12. El-Abbasi N, Meguid SA, Czekanski A. On the modeling of smooth contact surfaces using cubic splines. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 50:953-967.
13. Padmanabhan V, Laursen TA. A framework for development of surface smoothing procedures in large deformation frictional contact analysis. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2001; 37:173-198.
14. 1-interpolations for two-dimensional frictional contact problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 51:1469-1495.
15. n continuous modelling of smooth contact surfaces using NURBS and application to 2D problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2003; 57:2177-2203.
16. Chamoret D, Saillard P, Rassineux A, Bergheau JM. New smoothing procedures in contact mechanics. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2004; 168:107-116.
17. Pietrzak G, Curnier A. A continuum mechanics modeling and augmented Lagrange formulation of multibody, large deformation frictional contact problems. In Proceedings of COMPLAS 5, Owen DR, Hinton E, Oñate E (eds). CIMNE: Barcelona, 1997; 878-883.
18. 1-continuous formulation for 3D finite deformation friction contact. Computational Mechanics 2002; 29:27-42.
19. Puso MA, Laursen TA. A 3D contact smoothing method using Gregory patches. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2002; 54:1161-1194.
20. Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric Analysis. Wiley: New York, 2009.
21. Franke D, Düster A, Nübel V, Rank E. A comparison of the h-, p-, hp- and rp-version of the FEM for the solution of the 2D Hertzian contact problem. Computational Mechanics 2010; 45:513-522.
22. Konyukhov A, Schweizerhof K. Incorporation of contact for high-order finite elements in covariant form. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2009; 198:1213-1223.
23. Samimi M, van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD. An enriched cohesive zone model for delamination in brittle interfaces. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2009; 80(5):609-630.
24. Guiamatsia I, Ankersen JK, Davies GAO, Iannucci L. Decohesion finite element with enriched basis functions for delamination. Composites Science and Technology 2009; 69(15-16):2616-2624.
25. Xu XP, Needleman A. Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 1994; 42(9):1397-1434.
26. Sauer RA, Li S. An atomic interaction-based continuum model for adhesive contact mechanics. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2007; 43(5):384-396.
27. Sauer RA, Wriggers P. Formulation and analysis of a 3D finite element implementation for adhesive contact at the nanoscale. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2009; 198:3871-3883.
28. Sauer RA. Computational contact formulations for soft body adhesion. In Advances in Soft Matter Mechanics, Li S, Sun B (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2011.
29. Tian Y, Pesika N, Zeng H, Rosenberg K, Zhao B, McGuiggan P, Autumn K, Israelachvili J. Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006; 103(51):19320-19325.
30. Sauer RA. A computational contact model for nanoscale rubber adhesion. In Constitutive Models for Rubber VI, Heinrich G, Kaliske M, Lion A, Reese S (eds). Taylor & Francis Group: London, 2009; 47-52.
31. Hughes TJR. The Finite Element Method. Dover: New York, 2000.
32. Braess D. Finite Elements-Theory, Fast Solvers, and Applications in Solid Mechanics (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2001.
33. Wriggers P. Nonlinear Finite Element Methods. Springer: Berlin, 2008.
34. Sauer RA. The peeling behavior of thin films with finite bending stiffness and the implications on gecko adhesion. Journal of Adhesion 2010; accepted.
35. Sauer RA. Multiscale modeling and simulation of the deformation and adhesion of a single gecko seta. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2009; 12(6):627-640.
36. Sauer RA, Holl M. A detailed 3d finite element analysis of the peeling behavior of a gecko spatula. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 2010; submitted.
37. Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R, Mecke K, Jacobs K, Gorb SN, Arzt E. Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005; 102(45):16293-16296.
38. Sun W, Neuzil P, Kustandi TS, Oh S, Samper D. The nature of the gecko lizard adhesive force. Biophysics Journal 2005; 89(2):L14-L17.
39. Yang B, Laursen TA, Meng X. Two dimensional mortar contact methods for large deformation frictional sliding. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 62:1183-1225.
40. Fischer KA, Wriggers P. Mortar based frictional contact formulation for higher order interpolations using the moving friction cone. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:5020-5036.