On using a penalty-based cohesive-zone finite element approach, Part I: Elastic solution benchmarks

International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

Volumn 28, Issue 4-5, 2008, Pages 237-255

  Diehl, Ted ^a  

^a DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohesive elements; Finite element stress analysis; Fracture mechanics; Peel

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CRACK INITIATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURFACE STRUCTURE;

DOUBLE CANTILEVER BEAM (DCB) ANALYSIS; GRIFFITH ENERGY RELEASE; NONLINEAR CRACK PROPAGATION; PENALTY-BASED COHESIVE-ZONE; PSEUDO-ANALYTICAL BENCHMARKS;

ADHESIVES;

EID: 38749121708     PISSN: 01437496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alfano G., and Crisfield M.A. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50 (2001) 1701-1736
2. IC, of structural adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) Specimens. British Standard BS 7991:2001, October 23, 2001.
3. Benzeggagh M.L., and Kenane M. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol 56 (1996) 439-449
4. Blackman B.R.K., Hadavinia H., Kinloch A.J., and Williams J.G. The use of cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively-bonded joints. Int J Fract 119 (2003) 25-46
5. IC, of structural adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) specimens. European Structural Integrity Society, June 22, 2000.
6. Broek D. Elementary engineering fracture mechanics (1986), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht
7. Camanho PP, Davila CG. mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002-211737, June 2002.
8. Chen J., Crisfield M., Kinloch A.J., et al. Predicting progressive delamination of composite material specimens via interface elements. Mech Compos Mater Struct 6 (1999) 301-317
9. Diehl T., Carroll D., and Nagaraj B. Applications of DSP to explicit dynamic FEA simulations of elastically-dominated impact problems. Shock Vib 7 (2000) 167-177
10. Georgiou I., Hadavinia H., et al. Cohesive zone models and the plastically deforming peel test. J Adhes 79 (2003) 239-265
11. Hadavinia H, Kinloch AJ, Williams JG. Finite element analysis of fracture processes in composites and adhesively-bonded joints using cohesive zone models. In: Guagliano M, Aliabadi MH, editors. Advances in fracture and damage mechanics, vol. II. 2001. p. 445-50.
12. Kinloch A.J. Adhesion and adhesives (1990), Chapman & Hall, London
13. Kinloch AJ, Hadavinia H, et al. The peel behavior of adhesive joints. In: Proceeding of the annual meeting of the adhesive society, 23rd ed. 2000.
14. Kinloch A.J., Lau C.C., and Williams J.G. The peeling of flexible laminates. Int J Fract 66 (1994) 45-70