Mapping form and function in urban areas: An approach based on urban metrics and continuous impervious surface data

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 143-155

  Van de Voorde, Tim ^a   Jacquet, Wolfgang ^a,b   Canters, Frank ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Distribution based signatures; Impervious surfaces; Spatial metrics; Urban growth modelling; Urban remote sensing

Indexed keywords

IMAGE RESOLUTION; LAND USE; MORPHOLOGY; REMOTE SENSING;

DISTRIBUTION-BASED SIGNATURES; GROWTH MODELLING; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE; SPATIAL METRICS; URBAN REMOTE SENSING;

URBAN GROWTH;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA ACQUISITION; EMPLOYMENT; GROWTH MODELING; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE CHANGE; REMOTE SENSING; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN MORPHOLOGY; URBAN PLANNING;

COUNTY DUBLIN; DUBLIN [COUNTY DUBLIN]; IRELAND; LEINSTER;

EID: 79960083416     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Atkinson P., Cutler M., Lewis H. Mapping sub-pixel proportional land cover with AVHRR imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1997, 18:917-935.
2. Barnsley M.J., Barr S.L. Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using kernel-based spatial reclassification. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 1996, 62:949-958.
3. Barnsley M.J., Møller-Jensen L., Barr S.L. Inferring urban land use by spatial and structural pattern recognition. Remote sensing and urban analysis 2001, 115-144. Taylor & Francis, London. J. Donnay, M.J. Barnsley, P.A. Longley (Eds.).
4. Bartley B., Kitchin R. Understanding contemporary Ireland 2007, Pluto Press, Dublin.
5. Bauer M.E., Loffelholz B.C., Wilson B. Estimating and mapping impervious surface area by regression analysis of Landsat imagery. Remote sensing of impervious surfaces 2008, 3-19. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. Q. Weng (Ed.).
6. Cao C., Lam N.S.N. Understanding the scale and resolution effects in remote sensing and GIS. Scale in remote sensing and GIS 1997, 57-72. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. D.A. Quattrochi, M.F. Goodchild (Eds.).
7. Congalton R. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 37:35-46.
8. Cracknell A.P. Synergy in remote sensing-what's in a pixel?. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19:2025-2047.
9. Deng J.S., Wang K., Hong Y., Qi J.G. Spatio-temporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 92:187-198.
10. Engelen G., Lavalle C., Barredo J.I., Van der Meulen M., White R. The Moland modelling framework for urban and regional land-use dynamics. Modelling land-use change progress and applications 2007, 297-320. Springer, Dordrecht. E. Koomen, J. Stillwell, A. Balkema, H. Scholten (Eds.).
11. ESCTC, European Sustainable Cities and Towns Campaign (1994). Charter of European cities and towns towards sustainability.
12. Fahlman S.E., Lebiere C. The cascade-correlation learning architecture. Advances in neural information processing systems 1990, 524-532. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher Inc, San Fransisco. D.S. Touretzky (Ed.).
13. Grimm N.B., Faeth S.H., Golubiewski N.E., Redman C.L., Wu J., Bai X., et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 38:759-760.
14. Herold M., Goldstein N.C., Clarke K.C. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003, 86:286-302.
15. Herold M., Liu X., Clarke K.C. Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2003, 69:991-1001.
16. Huang J., Lu X.X., Sellers J.M. A global comparative analysis of urban form: Applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 82:184-197.
17. Hung W.-C., Chen Y.-C., Cheng K.-S. Comparing landcover patterns in Tokyo, Kyoto, and Taipei using ALOS multispectral images. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 97:132-145.
18. Ji W., Ma J., Twibell R.W., Underhill K. Characterising urban sprawl using multi-stage remote sensing images and landscape metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2006, 30:861-879.
19. Kavzoglu T., Mather P.M. The use of backpropagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2003, 24:4907-4938.
20. Kohonen T. Self-organzing maps 2001, Springer, Berlin. 3rd ed.
21. Longley P.A. Geographical information systems: Will developments in urban remote sensing and GIS lead to 'better' urban geography?. Progress in Human Geography 2002, 26:231-239.
22. Lu D., Weng Q. Use of impervious surface in urban land-use classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 2006, 102:146-160.
23. Luck M., Wu J. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: A case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology 2002, 17:327-339.
24. McGarigal K., Marks B.J. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure - Gen. Tech. Report PNW-GTR-351 1995, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
25. McInerny D.O., Walsh C. Spatial distribution of urban land-use change in the Dublin city-region: 1990-2006. Irish Geography 2009, 42:207-223.
26. Mesev T.V., Longley P.A., Batty M., Xie Y. Morphology from imagery: Detecting and measuring the density of urban land use. Environment and Planning 1995, 27:759-780.
27. MOLAND project (2010). Moland project website url: Accessed 30 June 2010. http://moland.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
28. O'Neill R.V., Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., Jackson B., Deangelis D.L., et al. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1988, 1:153-162.
29. Phinn S., Stanford M., Scarth P., Murray A.T., Shyy P.T. Monitoring the composition of urban environments based on the vegetation-impervious-soil (VIS) model by subpixel analysis techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2002, 23:4131-4153.
30. Poelmans L., Van Rompaey A. Detecting and modelling spatial patterns of urban sprawl in highly fragmented areas: A case study in the Flanders-Brussels region. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 93:10-19.
31. Rashed T., Weeks J.R., Gadella M.S., Hill A.G. Revealing the anatomy of cities through spectral mixture analysis of multi-spectral satellite imagery: A case study of the Greater Cairo Region, Egypt. Geocarto International 2001, 16:5-15.
32. Ridd M.K. Exploring a V-I-S (Vegetation-Impervious Surface-Soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing-Comparative anatomy for cities. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1995, 16:2165-2185.
33. Sánchez-Rodríguez R., Seto K.C., Simon D., Solecki W.D., Kraas F., Laumann G. Science plan urbanization and global environmental change-IHDP report 15 2005, Bonn, Germany.
34. Schneider A., Woodcock C.E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies 2008, 45:659-692.
35. Schwarz N. Urban form revisited-Selecting indicators for characterising European cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 96:29-47.
36. Seto K.C., Fragkias M. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban land-use change in four cities of China with time series landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology 2005, 20:871-888.
37. Turner M.G. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 1989, 20:171-197.
38. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology 1991, Springer-Verlag, New York.
39. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs - Population Division (2009). World population prospects: The 2008 revision (pp. 1-107). Working paper number ESA/P/WP.210.
40. Van de Voorde T., De Genst W., Canters F. Improving pixel-based VHR land-cover classifications of urban areas with post-classification techniques. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2007, 73:1017-1027.
41. Van de Voorde T., De Roeck T., Canters F. A comparison of two spectral mixture modelling approaches for impervious surface mapping in urban areas. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 30:4785-4806.
42. van der Kwast, J., Van de Voorde, T., Uljee, I., Engelen, G., Lavalle, C., & Canters, F. (2009). Using remote sensing derived spatial metrics for the calibration of land-use change models. In P. Gamba (Ed.), Proceedings of the IEEE 2009 joint urban remote sensing event. New York, IEEE Press, unpaginated.
43. Weng Y.C. Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 81:341-353.
44. Weng Q. Remote sensing of impervious surfaces 2008, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton FL.
45. Wu C. Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 2004, 93:480-492.
46. Wu C., Murray A.T. Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003, 84:493-505.
47. Yang X., Liu Z. Use of satellite-derived landscape imperviousness index to characterize urban spatial growth. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2005, 29:524-540.