Understanding the Scale and Resolution Effects in Remote Sensing and GIS

Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 57-72

  Cao, Changyong ^a   Lam, Nina Siu Ngan ^b  

^a STENNIS SPACE CENTER   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85148835472     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203740170-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Alker, R., A typology of ecological fallacies, in Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences, Dogan, M. and Rokkan M., Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1969, 3
2. Batty, M. and Longley, P., The fractal simulation of urban structure, Environ. Plan. A, 18, 1143, 1986
3. Bian, L. and Walsh, S. J., Scale dependencies of vegetation and topography in a mountainous environment of Montana, Prof. Geogr., 45, 1, 1993
4. Buưough, P. A., Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil — the application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation, J. Soil Sci., 34, 577, 1983
5. Chou, Y. H., Map resolution and spatial autocoưelation, Geogr. Anal., 23, 228, 1991
6. Clark, W. and Avery, K., The effects of data aggregation in statistical analysis, Geogr. Anal., 8, 428, 1976
7. Clarke, K., Scale-based simulation of topography, in Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Comp.-Assisted Cartogr., (Auto-Carto 8), Baltimore, 1987
8. Clarke, K., Scale based simulation of topographic relief,Am. Cartogr., 15, 173, 1988
9. Davis, F. W, Quattrochi, D., Ridd, M. K., Lam, N., Walsh, S., Michaelsen, J., Franklin, J., Stow, D., Johannsen, C., and Johnston, C., Environmental analysis using integrated GIS and remotely sensed data: some research needs and priorities, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 57, 689, 1991
10. De Cola, L., Fractal analysis of a classified Landsat scene, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 55, 601, 1989
11. Dutton, G. H,, Fractal enhancement of cartographic line detail, Aw. Cartogr., 8, 23, 1981
12. Fournier, A., Fussell, D., and Carpenter, L. C., Computer rendering of stochastic models. Communications, Association for Computing Machinery, 25, 371, 1982
13. Gehlke, C. E. and Biehl, H., Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the coưelation coefficient in census tract material, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 29, 169, 1934
14. Gonzalez, R. C. and Wintz, P., Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 1987, 414
15. Goodchild, M. F., Fractals and the accuracy of geographical measures, Math. Geol, 12, 85, 1980
16. Goodchild, M. F., Spatial Autocorrelation, CATMOG, 47, Geobooks, Norwich, England, 1987
17. Goodchild, M. F. and Mark, D. M., The fractal nature of geographic phenomena. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 11, 265, 1987
18. Goodchild, M. F., Haining, R., and Wise, S., Integrating GIS and spatial data analysis: problems and possibilities, Int. J. GIS, 6, 407, 1992
19. Henderson-Sellers, A., Wilson, M. F., and Thomas, G., The effect of spatial resolution on archives of land cover type, Climatic Change, 1, 391, 1985
20. Klinkenberg, B., Tests of a fractal model of topography. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geography, The University of Western Ontario, 1988
21. Lam, N., An evaluation of areal interpolation methods. Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Comp.-Assisted Cartogr. (Auto-Carto 5J, 2, 471, 1982
22. Lam, N., Spatial interpolation methods: a review, Am. Cartogr., 10, 129, 1983
23. Lam, N., Description and measurement of Landsat TM images using fractals, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 56, 187, 1990
24. Lam, N. and Quattrochi, D. A., On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences, Prof. Geogr., 44, 88, 1992
25. Lam, N. and De Cola, L., Eds., Fractals in Geography, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993
26. Mark, D. M. and Aronson, P. B., Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: an empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping, Math. Geol., 11, 671, 1984
27. Markham, B. L. and Townshend, J. R. G., Land cover classification accuracy as a function of sensor spatial resolution. Proc. 15th Int. Symp. Remote Sensing Environ., Ann Arbor, 1075, 1981
28. Meentemeyer, V. and Box, E. O., Scale effects in landscape studies. Ecol. Studies, 64,15,1987
29. Moellering, H. and Tobler, W., Geographical variances, Geogr. Anal., 4, 35, 1972
30. Nellis, M. D. and Briggs, J. M., The effect of spatial scale on Konza landscape classification using textural analysis, Landscape Ecol., 2, 93, 1989
31. Openshaw, S., The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. CATMOG, 38, Geobooks, Norwich, England, 1984
32. Quattrochi, D. A. and Pelletier, R. E., Remote sensing for analysis of landscapes: an introduction, in Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H., Eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991, 51
33. Robinson, W. S., Ecological coưelation and the behavior of individuals, Am. Sociol. Rev., 15, 351, 1950
34. Simonett, D. S. and Coiner, J. C., Susceptibility of environments to low resolution imaging for land-use mapping, Proc. 7th Int. Symp. Remote Sensing Environ., Ann Arbor, 373, 1971
35. Tobler, W. R., Resolution, resampling and all that, in Building Databases for Global Science, Mounsey, H., Ed., Taylor and Francis, New York, 1988, 129
36. Turner, M. G., O’Neill, R. B., Gardner, R. H., and Milne, B. T., Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern, Landscape Ecol., 3, 153, 1989
37. Watson, M., The scale problem in human geography, Geografiska Annaler, 67, 83, 1978
38. Woodcock, C. E. and Strahler, A. H., The factor of scale in remote sensing, Remote Sensing Environ., 21, 312, 1987