Biotechnology risk assessment in Australia: A molecular perspective

Environmental and Planning Law Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 236-248

  Fox, Sharon ^a   Morrison Saunders, Angus ^a   Katscherian, Dianne ^b  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960070334     PISSN: 0813300X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. "Biotechnology" is an umbrella term used to describe a number of experimental protocols that are used to transfer highly modified genetic information (DNA) from one organism to another organism, eg from a bacteria to a plant or from a plant to a plant. The terms biotechnology and gene technology are used interchangeably in this paper.
2. Australia, Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee, A Cautionary Tale: Fish Don't Lay Tomatoes (Australia, 2000) available online at http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/1999-02/gene/report/report.pdf (viewed 15 May 2006).
3. Genetically modified (GM) crops are those that have been modified using biotechnology procedures.
4. Hain M, Cocklin C and Gibbs D, "Regulating Biosciences: The Gene Technology Act 2000" (2002) 19 EPLJ 163 at 176.
5. Bolt C, (2005) "Fears Force GM Chicken Feed from Chicken Menu", The West Australian (11 February 2005), p 5.
6. Australia, House of Representatives, Debates (22 June 2000) p 18104 (per the Hon Dr Michael Wooldridge, Minister for Health and Aged Care).
7. Hain et al, n 4 at p163.
8. Tranter M, "A Question of Confidence: An Appraisal of the Operation of the Gene Technology Act 2000" (2003) 20 EPLJ 245 at 259.
9. Lawson C, "Risk Assessment in the Regulation of Gene Technology Under the Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth) and the Gene Technology Regulations 2001 (Cth)" (2002) 19 EPLJ 195.
10. Lawson, n 9 at 195.
11. Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan: Agronomic Assessment and Seed Increase in Eastern Australia of Transgenic Cotton Expressing cry1Ac and cry2Ab genes from Bacillus thuringiensis - DIR 005/2001 (OGTR, 2001).
12. Lawson, n 9 at 208.
13. Millstone E, Brunner E and Mayer S, "Beyond Substantial Equivalence" (1999) 401 Nature 525.
14. World Health Organisation (WHO), Strategies for Assessing the Safety of Foods Produced by Biotechnology (Report of Joint FAO/WHO Consultation, Geneva, 1991).
15. Kuiper HA, Kleter GA, Hub P, Noteborn JM and Kok EJ, "Assessment of the Food Safety Issues Related to Genetically Modified Foods" (2001) 27(6) The Plant Journal 503 at 504.
16. International Food Biotechnology Committee (IFBC), "Nutritional and Safety Assessments of Foods and Feeds Nutritionally Improved through Biotechnology" (2004) 3 Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 1 at 45.
17. Kuiper et al, n 15 at 504
18. IFBC, n 16 at 45.
19. Schubert D, "Sensible Regulations for GM Food Crops" (2005) 23 Nature Biotechnology 785.
20. Ames BN, Profet M, Gold LS, "Dietary Pesticides (99.99% all natural)" (1990) 87 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 7777.
21. Corpillo D, Gardini G, Vaira AM, Basso M, Aime S, Accotto GP and Fasano M, "Proteomics as a Tool to Improve Investigation of Substantial Equivalence in Genetically Modified Organisms: The Case of a Virus-Resistant Tomato" (2004) 4 Proteomics 193.
22. Millstone et al, n 13 at 525.
23. Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth), s 3.
24. Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan: DIR 021/2002, Commercial Release of Genetically Modified (InVigor® hybrid) Canola (OGTR, 2003).
25. OGTR, n 23, p 59.
26. Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth), s 3.
27. OGTR, n 23, p 20.
28. Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth), s 28.
29. Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth), s 27(e).
30. Gene Technology Regulations 2001 (Cth), s 10(1).
31. Australia New Zealand Food Authority (ANZFA), Food derived from insect-protected corn line Mon810: A Safety Assessment (Technical Report Series Number 5, ANZFA, 2001) available online at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/TR5.pdf (viewed 15 May 2006).
32. Australia New Zealand Food Authority (ANZFA), Food derived from insect-protected, herbicide-tolerant Bt-11 corn: A safety Assessment (Technical Report series No 10, ANZFA, 2001) available online at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/TR10.pdf (viewed 15 May 2006).
33. ANZFA, n 30, p 3.
34. ANZFA, n 30, p 15.
35. Saxena D and Stotzky G, "Bt Corn Has a Higher Lignin Content Than Non-Bt Corn" (2001) 88 (9) American J Bot 1704.
36. Sewalt VJH, Weiting NW, Blount JW, Jung HC, Masoud SA, Howle PA, Lamb C and Dixon RA, "Reduced Lignin Content and Altered Lignin Composition in Transgenic Tobacco Down-Regulated in Expression of L-Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase or Cinnamate 4-Hydroxylase" (1997) 115 (1) Plant Physiol 41.
37. Kutchan TM, "Predictive Metabolic Engineering in Plants: Still Full of Surprises" (2005) 23 (8) Trends in Biotechnology 381.
38. Freese W and Schubert D, "Safety Testing of Genetically Engineered Food" (2004) 21 Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 299.
39. ANZFA, n 30, p 15.
40. Schubert, n 19 at 786.
41. McGregor D, "Diets, Food Components and Human Cancer" (1998) 11 Biotherapy 189.
42. Peel J, The Precautionary Principle in Practice: Environmental Decision-Making and Scientific Uncertainty (The Federation Press, 2005).
43. Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), Risk Analysis Framework (OGTR, 2005).
44. OGTR, n 42, p 18.
45. OGTR, n 42, p 18.
46. OGTR, n 42, p 35.
47. OGTR, n 42, p 35.
48. OGTR, n 42, p 37.
49. OGTR, n 42, p 28.
50. OGTR, n 42, p 25.
51. Millstone et al, n 13 at 526; Corpillo et al, n 21 at 199.
52. OGTR, n 42, p 45.
53. IFBC, n 16 at 45.
54. Miller HI and Conko G, "Precaution Without Principle" (2001) 19 Nature Biotechnology 302; IFBC, n 16 at 39.
55. WHO, n 14 at s 4.2.1.
56. Glick BR and Pasternak JJ, Molecular Biotechnology: Principals and Applications of Recombinant DNA (3rd ed, ASM Press, 2003) pp 517-523.
57. Makarevitch I, Svitashev SK, and Somers DA, "Complete Sequence Analysis of Transgene Loci from Plants Transformed via Microprojectile Bombardment" (2003) 52 Plant Mol Biol 421.
58. Forsbach A, Schubert D, Lechtenberg B, Gils M and Schmidt R, "A Comprehensive Characterization of Single-Copy T-DNA Insertions in the Arabidopsis Thaliana Genome" (2003) 52 Plant Mol Biol 161.
59. Forsbach et al, n 57 at 162.
60. Miller and Conko, n 53 at 302.
61. Hurst LD, Pál C and Lercher MJ, "The Evolutionary Dynamics of Eukaryotic Gene Order" (2004) 5 Nature Reviews Genetics 299.
62. Martineau B, The Creation of the FlavrSavr® Tomato and the Birth of Biotech Food (McGraw-Hill, 2001) p 69.
63. Takano M, Egawa H, Ikedo J and Wakasa K, "The Structures of Integration Sites in Transgenic Rice" (1997) 11(3) The Plant Journal 353.
64. Somers DA, Olhoft PM, Makarevitch IF and Svitashev SK "Mechanism(s) of Transgene Locus Formation" in Laing DH and Skinner DZ (eds) Genetically modified crops: their development, uses and risks, (Haworth Press, 2004).
65. Gasson M and Burke D, "Scientific Perspectives on Regulating the Safety of Genetically Modified Foods" (2001) 2 Nature Reviews Genetics 217.
66. Schubert D, "A Different Perspective on GM Food" (2002) 20 Nature Biotechnology 969.
67. Schubert, n 64 at 969.
68. Schubert, n 19 at 786.
69. Weigel D, Ahn JH, Bla'Zquez MA, Borevitz JO, Christensen SK, Fankhauser C, Ferra'ndiz C, Kardailsky I, Malancharuvil EJ, Neff MM, Nguyen JT, Sato S, Wang Z, Xia Y, Dixon RA, Harrison MJ, Lamb CJ, Yanofsky MF, and Chory J, "Activation Tagging in Arabidopsis" (2000) 122 Plant Physiology 1003.
70. Haselberger AG, "Codex Guidelines for GM Foods Include the Analysis of Unintended Effects" (2003) 21 Nature Biotechnology 739.
71. Haselberger, n 68 at 739; Kuiper et al, n 15 at 516: Both authors provide examples of unintended effects.
72. Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dörmann P, Altmann T, Trethewey RN and Willmitzer L, "Metabolite Profiling for Plant Functional Genomics" (2000) 18 Nature Biotechnology 1157.
73. IFBC, n 16 at 48.
74. Sweetlove LJ, Last RL and Fernie AR, "Predictive Metabolic Engineering: A Goal for Systems Biology" (2003) 132 Plant Physiology 420.
75. Roessner U, Luedemann A, Brust D, Fiehn O, Linke T, Willmitzer L and Fernie AR, "Metabolic Profiling Allows Comprehensive Phenotyping of Genetically or Environmentally Modified Plant Systems" (2001) 13 Plant Cell 11.
76. Roessner et al, n 73 at 16.
77. Urbanczyk-Wochniak E, Luedemann A, Kopka J, Selbig J, Roessner-Tunali U, Willmitzer L and Fernie AR, "Parallel Analysis of Transcript and Metabolic Profiles: A New Approach in Systems Biology" (2003) 4 (10) EMBO Reports 989.
78. Noteborn HPJM, Lommen A, Van der Jagt RC and Weseman JM, "Chemical Fingerprinting for the Evaluation of Unintended Secondary Metabolic Changes in Transgenic Food Crops" (2000) 77 Journal of Biotechnology 103.
79. Corpillo et al, n 21 at 193.
80. Sweetlove, et al, n 72.
81. Corpillo et al, n 21 at 193.
82. Corpillo et al, n 21 at 199.
83. OGTR, Response to questions, email correspondence with Sharon Fox (25 July 2005).
84. OGTR, n 42, p 47.
85. Lin W, Price GK and Allen EW, "StarLink: Impacts on the U.S. Corn Market and World Trade" (2003) 19 (4) Agribusiness 473.
86. Goldman LR and Bucchini L, "Starlink Corn: A Risk Analysis" (2002) 110 (1) Environmental Health Perspectives 5.
87. GRAIN, Australia: Farmers Outraged at Canola Contamination available online at http://www.grain.org/research/contamination.cfm?id=325 (viewed 24 April 2005).
88. Gene Technology Regulations 2000 (Cth), s 7(3)(a).
89. Gene Technology Regulations 2000 (Cth) s 7 (4)(c) and (d).
90. Kuiper et al, n 15 at 516; Freese and Schubert, n 37 at 315: Corpillo et al, n 21 at 293.
91. Australia, House of Representatives, n 6, p 18104 (per the Hon Dr Michael Wooldridge).