Scientific perspectives on regulating the safety of genetically modified foods

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 217-222

  Gasson, Michael ^a   Burke, Derek ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; FOOD HANDLING; FORECASTING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; HUMAN; REVIEW; SAFETY;

DNA; DRUG RESISTANCE, MICROBIAL; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; FORECASTING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HUMANS; SAFETY;

EID: 0035291008     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35056066     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Ewan, S. W. B. & Pusztai, A. Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet 354, 1353-1354 (1999).
2. The Royal Society. Review of data on possible toxicity of GM potatoes. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/policy/index (search 'pusztai') (1999).
3. GM food safety: facts, uncertainties and assessment. The OECD Edinburgh Conference on the Scientific and Health Aspects ot Genetically Modified Foods. Published by OECD as Genetically Modified Foods, Widening the Debate an Health and Safety. (OECD 2000). www.oecd.org/subject/biotech/edinburgh.htm)
4. Chen, Z.-L. et al. Safety assessment for transgenic sweet pepper and tomato (submitted)
5. Teshima, R. et al. Effect of GM and non-GM soybeans on the immune system of BN rats and BIOA mice. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Japan 41, 188-193 (2000).
6. Nuffield Council on Bioethics in Genetically Modified Crops: the Ethical and Social Issues. 96-105 (Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, 1999). Also see http://www.nuffield.org/bioethics/publication/ modifiedcrops/index.html
7. Food and Agriculture Organisation/World Health Organisation Strategies for Assessing the Safety of Foods Produced by Biotechnology (WHO, Geneva, 1991).
8. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Safety Evaluation of Foods Produced by Modem Biotechnology - Concepts and Principles (OECD, Paris, 1993).
9. Food and Agriculture Organisation/World Health Organization. Biotechnology and Food Safety (FAO, Rome, 1996).
10. Millstone, E., Brunner, E. & Mayer, S. Beyond 'substantial equivalence'. Nature 401, 525-526 (1999).
11. Trewavas, T. & Leaver, C. J. Conventional crops are the test of GM prejudice. Nature 401, 640 (1999).
12. Burke, D. C. No GM conspiracy. Nature 401, 640-641 (1999).
13. Kearns, P. & Mayers, P. Substantial equivalence is a useful tool. Nature 401, 640 (1999).
14. Hammond, J. R. M. Genetically-modified brewing yeasts for the twenty-first century. Progress to date. Yeast 11, 1613-1627 (1995)
15. Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes Annual Report 1993. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food/Department of Health, Crown Copyright PB1856 (1994).
16. Monsanto Company Reports. Molecular Characterisation and Safety Assessment of Roundup Ready Soybean Event 40-3-2 http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/ pdf_files/acnfp/summary.pdf (2000).
17. Ishida, Y. et al. High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 745-750 (1996).
18. Nap, J. P., Bijovoet, J. & Stiekma, W. J. Biosafety of kanamycin-resistant transgenic plants. Transgenic Res. 1, 239-249 (1992).
19. ACNFP Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes Annual Report 1995. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food/Department of Health, Crown Copyright PB3203 (1996).
20. Pechere, J.-C. α-lactamase gene in a transgenic maize? Antibiotics Chemotherapy 1, 9 (1997).
21. Pechere, J.-C. Concerns about the presence of celactamase gene in transgenic maize? Antibiotics Chemotherapy 2, 16 (1998).
22. Komari, T., Hiei, Y., Saito, Y., Mural, N. & Kumashiro, T. Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for cotransformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of the transformants freed from selection marker. Plant J. 10, 165-174 (1996).
23. Dale, E. C. & Ow, D. W. Gene transfer with subsequent removal of the selection gene from the host genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 10558-10562 (1991).
24. Anon. Novartis pins hopes for GM seeds on new marker system. Nature 406, 924 (2000).
25. Mercer, D. K., Scott, K. P., Bruce-Johnson, W. A., Glover, L. A. & Flint, H. J. Fate of free DNA and transformation of the oral bacterium Streptococcus gordonii DL1 by plasmid DNA in human saliva. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 6-10 (1999).
26. Chambers, P. A., Duggan, P. S., Heritage, J. & Forbes, J. M. Survival of DNA from feeding stuffs in the gastrointestinal tract of chickens. Nature Biotechnol. (in the press) (2000).
27. Schubbert, R., Lettmann, C. & Doerfler, W. Ingested foreign (PhageM13) survives transiently in the gastrointestinal tract and enters the bloodstream of mice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 242, 495-504 (1994).
28. Schubbert, R, Renz, D., Schmitz, B. & Doerfler, W. Foreign (M13) DNA ingested by mice reaches peripheral leukocytes, spleen, and liver via the intestinal wall mucosa and can be covalently linked to mouse DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 961-966 (1997).
29. Schubbert, R., Hohlweg, U., Renz, D. & Doerfler, W. On the fate of orally ingested foreign DNA in mice: chromosomal association and placental transmission to the fetus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 259, 569-576 (1998).
30. Beever, D. E. & Kemp, C. F. Safety issues associated with the DNA in animal feed derived from genetically modified crops. A review of scientific and regulatory procedures. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. Series B: Livestock Feeds and Feeding 70, 175-182 (2000).
31. Lorenz, M. G. & Wackernagel, W. Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment. Microbiol. Rev. 58, 563-602 (1994).
32. Gasson, M. J. Gene transfer from genetically modified food. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11, 505-508 (2000).
33. Schluter, K., Futterer, J. & Potrykus, I. 'Horizontal' gene transfer from a transgenic potato line to a bacterial pathogen (Erwinia chysanthemi) occurs - if at all - at an extremely low frequency. Biotechnology 13, 1094-1098 (1995).
34. De Vries, J. & Wackernagel, W. Detection of nptll kanamycin resistance genes in genomes of transgenic plants by marker-rescue transformation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257, 606-613 (1998).
35. Gebhard, F. & Smalla, K. Transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 by transgenic sugar beet DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 1550-1554 (1998).
36. Lean, G., Angres, V. & Jury, L. GM genes 'can spread to people and animals'. The Independent (28 May 2000).
37. Metcalf, D. B. et al. Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 36, S165-S186 (1996)
38. Protall. Food allergens of plant origin - the relationship between allergenic potential and biological activity www.ifr.bbsrc.ac.uk/protall. Published by the Institute for Food Research, August 2000.
39. Open letter from Professor S. L. Taylor, (22 September 2000). http://www.who.int/fsf/Gmfood/Consultation_May2000/ Biotech_00_07 (2000).
40. Dale, P. J. Public reactions and scientific responses to transgenic crops. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 203-208 (1999).