Where does business research go from here? Food-for-thought on academic papers in business research

Journal of Business Research

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1104-1107

  Geuens, Maggie ^a  

^a VLERICK BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Business research; Citations; Impact factor; Replication studies; Significance levels

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959984694     PISSN: 01482963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Armstrong J.S. Unintelligible management research and academic prestige. Interfaces 1980, 10(2):80-86.
2. Armstrong J.S. Management science: what does it have to do with management or science?. Mark Bull 1998, 9(1):1-15.
3. Armstrong J.S. Discovery and communication of important marketing findings: evidence and proposals. J Bus Res 2003, 56(1):69-84.
4. Armstrong J.S. Incentives for developing and communicating principles: a reply. Interfaces 2003, 33(8):109-111.
5. Armstrong J.S. Does an academic paper contain useful knowledge? No (p<.05). Commentary on the Mort et al. paper. Australas Mark J 2004, 12(2):62-63.
6. Armstrong J.S., Brodie R.J., Parsons A.G. Hypotheses in marketing science: literature review and publication audit. Mark Lett 2001, 12(2):171-187.
7. Armstrong J.S., Pagell R. Reaping benefits from management research: lessons from the forecasting principles project. Interfaces 2003, 33(6):89-111.
8. Atkinson D.R., Furlon M.J., Wampold B.E. Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations, and the scientific process: is there a (statistically) significant relationship?. J Couns Psychol 1982, 29(2):189-194.
9. Blaug M. The methodology of economics: or how economics explain 1992, Cambridge University Press, New York.
10. Ellson T. Assessing contribution of research in business to practice. J Bus Res 2009, 62(11):1160-1164.
11. Evanschitzky H., Baumgarth C., Hubbard R., Armstrong J.S. Replication research's disturbing trend. J Bus Res 2007, 60(4):411-415.
12. Forster N. CEO's readership of business and management journals in Australia: implications for research and teaching. J Manage Organ 2007, 13(1):24-40.
13. Harter S.P. The impact of electronic journals on scholarly communications: a citation analysis. Public Access Comput Syst Rev 1996, 7(5):5-34.
14. Hubbard R., Lindsay R.M. How the emphasis on 'original' empirical marketing research impedes knowledge development. Mark Theory 2002, 2(4):381-402.
15. Hubbard R., Vetter D.E. An empirical comparison of published replication research in accounting, economics, finance, management and marketing. J Bus Res 1996, 35(2):153-164.
16. Huber J. Journal of Marketing Research in the new competitive journalistic environment. J Mark Res 2007, 44(1):1-3.
17. Jeang K.T. The importance of individualized article-specific metrics for evaluating research productivity. Retrovirology 2009, 6(82):1-4.
18. King J. A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J Inf Sci 1987, 13(5):261-276.
19. Kousha K., Thelwall M., Rezaie S. Using the web for research evaluation: the integrated online impact indicator. J Informetrics 2010, 4(1):124-135.
20. Mahoney M. Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cogn Ther Res 1977, 1:161-175.
21. Moussa S., Touzani M. Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index. J Informetrics 2010, 4(1):107-117.
22. Neuliep J.W., Crandall R. Reviewer bias against replication research. J Soc Behav Pers 1993, 8(6):22-29.
23. Rosenthal R. The "File Drawer Problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 1979, 86(3):638-641.
24. Rossiter J.R. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Int J Res Mark 2002, 19(4):305-335.
25. Rossiter J.R. Qualitative research rules. Int J Advert 2008, 27(5):915-919.
26. Sterling T.D., Rosenbaum W.L., Weinkam J.J. Publications decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. Am Stat 1995, 49(1):108-112.
27. Stewart J.A. Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles. Soc Forces 1983, 62(1):166-189.
28. Stremersch S., Lehmann D. Editorial. Int J Res Mark 2007, 24(1):1-2.
29. Stremersch S., Verniers I., Verhoef P.C. The quest for citations: drivers of article impact. J Mark 2007, 71(3):171-193.
30. Sutter D., Pjesky R. Where would Adam Smith publish today? The near absence of math-free research in top journals. Econ J Watch 2007, 4(2):230-240.
31. Yadav M.S. The decline of conceptual articles and implications for knowledge development. J Mark 2010, 74(1). 1-?
32. Woodside A.G. Journal and author impact metrics: an editorial. J Bus Res 2009, 62(1):1-4.