Read all about it!! What happens following a technology shock?

American Economic Review

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1144-1179

  Alexopoulos, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959881927     PISSN: 00028282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.4.1144     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alexopoulos, Michelle. 2011. "Read All About It! What Happens Following a Technology Shock?: Dataset. American Economic Review http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?-doi10.1257/aer.101.4.1144.
2. Alexopoulos, Michelle and Jon Cohen. 2011. "Volumes of Evidence: Examining Technical Change Last Century through a New Lens." Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(2): 413-50.
3. Alexopoulos, Michelle, and Jon Cohen. 2009. "Measuring Our Ignorance, One Book at a Time: New Indicators of Technological Change, 1909-1949." Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(4): 450-70.
4. Altig, David, Lawrence Christiano, Martin Eichenbaum, and Jesper Linde. 2003. "Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations." Unpublished.
5. Basu, Susanto, John G. Fernald, and Miles S. Kimball. 2006. "Are Technology Improvements Contractionary?" American Economic Review, 96(5): 1418-48.
6. Beaudry, Paul, and Franck Portier. 2006. "Stock Prices, News, and Economic Fluctuations." American Economic Review, 96(4): 1293-307.
7. The Bowker Annual, R.R. Bowker Company, NY, Various Years.
8. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2008. "GDP and the national income and product account (nipa) historical Tables." US Department of Commerce. http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/SelectTable.asp?Selected=N (accessed June 30, 2008)
9. Christensen, Lone E., 2008. "Do Technology Shocks lead to Productivity Slowdowns? Evidence from Patent Data." International Monetary Fund Working Paper 08/24.
10. Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin Eichenbaum, and Robert Vigfusson. 2002. "What Happens After a Technology Shock?" Unpublished.
11. Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin Eichenbaum, and Robert Vigfusson. 2004. "The Response of Hours to a Technology Shock: Evidence Based on Direct Measures of Technology." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10254.
12. Christiano, Lawrence J., and Terry J. Fitzgerald. 2003. "The Band Pass Filter." International Economic Review, 44(2): 435-65. (Pubitemid 36831909)
13. Comin, Diego, and Mark Gertler. 2006. "Medium-Term Business Cycles." American Economic Review, 96(3): 523-51. (Pubitemid 44273969)
14. Fisher, Jonas D. M. 2002. "Technology Shocks Matter." Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Working Paper WP-02-14.
15. Francis, Neville, and Valerie A. Ramey. 2005. "Is the Technology-Driven Real Business Cycle Hypothesis Dead? Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations Revisited." Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(8): 1379-99. (Pubitemid 43008692)
16. Francois, Patrick. and Huw Lloyd-Ellis. 2006. "Intrinsic Business Cycles with Pro-Cyclical R&D." Queen's University, Department of Economics Working Paper 1102.
17. Galí, Jordi. 1999. "Technology, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations?" American Economic Review, 89(1): 249-71.
18. Galí, Jordi. 1999. "What Do Technology Shocks Do? Comment." In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1998, ed. Ben S. Bernanke and Julio J. Rotemberg, 310-17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Galí, Jordi, and Luca Gambetti. 2008. On the Sources of the Great Moderation: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14171, 2008.
20. Galí, Jordi, and Pau Rabanal. 2004. Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations: How Well Does the Rbs Model Fit Postwar US Data?: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10636, 2004.
21. Geisler Eliezer, 2000."The metrics of science and technology." Westport, CT: Quorum Books
22. Global Insights. 2008. "Basic Economics Database." Global Insights, Inc. http://dc.chass.utoronto.ca/citibaseA/(accessed June 30, 2008).
23. Griliches, Zvi. 1990. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey." Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661-707.
24. Jaffe, Adam B. 1999. "What Do Technology Shocks Do? Comment." In Nber Macroeconomics Annual 1998, ed. Ben S. Bernanke and Julio J. Rotemberg, 317-20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Jaffe, Adam B., and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26. Library of Congress Classification. A-Z, Library of Congress, Cataloguing Distribution Services, Washington, D.C. Various years.
27. Lach, Saul. 1995. "Patents and Productivity Growth at the Industry Level: A First Look." Economics Letters, 49(1): 101-08.
28. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. 2002. "Research and Development in Industry: 1999, Table E1: Trends in total (Federal plus company and other) U.S. industrial R&D performance, by source of funds, in current and in constant dollars: 1953-99" NSF 02-312. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srs01410/#tables (accessed June 30, 2008).
29. Reimer, J. 1995. Personal computers from 1975-2005: Market sales and Market growth." http://www.pegasus3d.com/total-share.html (accessed May 5, 2005).
30. Reimer, Jermey. 2005. "Total share: 30 years of personal computer market share figures." Ars Technica, Wednesday, December 14. http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2005/12/total-share.ars
31. Ross, David R., and Klaus F. Zimmermann. 1993. "Evaluating Reported Determinants of Labor Demand." Labour Economics, 1(1): 71-84.
32. Shea, John. 1999. "What Do Technology Shocks Do?" In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1998, ed. Ben S. Bernanke and Julio J. Rotemberg, 275-310. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Wilson, Daniel. 2004. "IT and Beyond: The Contribution of Heterogenous Capital to Productivity" Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2004-13.
34. Yorukoglu, Mehmut. 2000. "Product versus Process Innovations and Economic Fluctuations." Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 52: 137-63.
35. Zarnowitz, Victor. 1992. Business Cycles: Theory, History, Indicators, and Forecasting. NBER Studies in Business Cycles, vol. 27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.