The response of hours to a technology shock: Evidence based on direct measures of technology

Journal of the European Economic Association

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 381-395

  Christiano, Lawrence J ^a   Eichenbaum, Martin ^a   Vigfusson, Robert ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444491210     PISSN: 15424766     EISSN: 15424774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/154247604323068078     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Altig, David, Lawrence J. Christiano, Martin Eichenbaum, and Jesper Linde (2002). An Estimated Dynamic, General Equilibrium Model for Monetary Policy Analysis. Working paper, Northwestern University.
2. Basu, Susanto, John G. Fernald, and Miles S. Kimball (1999). Are Technology Improvements Contractionary? Working paper, Chicago Federal Reserve.
3. Burnside, Craig, Martin Eichenbaum, and Sergio Rebelo (1995). Capacity Utilization and Returns to Scale. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1995, edited by Ben S. Bernanke, and Julio J. Rotemberg. MIT Press.
4. Burnside, Craig and Martin Eichenbaum (1996). Factor Hoarding and the Propagation of Business Cycle Shocks. American Economic Review, 86, 1154-1174.
5. Christiano, Lawrence J. (1988). Why Does Inventory Investment Fluctuate So Much? Journal of Monetary Economics, 21, 247-280.
6. Christiano, Lawrence J. and Martin Eichenbaum (1992). Current Real-Business-Cycle Theories and Aggregate Labor-Market Fluctuations. American Economic Review, 82, 430 -450.
7. Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin Eichenbaum and Robert Vigfusson, (2003). What Happens After A Technology Shock? Federal Reserve Board International Finance Discussion Paper 768.
8. Gall, Jordi (1999). Technology, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations? American Economic Review, 89, 249 -271.
9. Gall, Jordi (2004). On the Role of Technology Shocks as a Source of Business Cycles: Some New Evidence. Journal ofthe European Economic Association, 2, 372-380.
10. Gall, Jordi, J. David Lopez-Salido, and Javier Valles (2002). Technology Shocks and Monetary Policy: Assessing the Fed's Performance. NBER Working Paper No. 8768.
11. Hansen, Bruce E. (1995). Rethinking the Univariate Approach to Unit Root Testing: Using Covariates to Increase Power. Econometric Theory, 11, 1148-1171.
12. Hosking, J. R. M. (1980). The Multivariate Portmanteau Statistic. Journal ofthe American Statistical Association, 75, 602-608.
13. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford University Press.
14. Kiley, Michael (1997). Labor Productivity in U.S. Manufacturing: Does Sectoral Comove-ment Reflect Technology Shocks? Working paper, Federal Reserve Board.
15. King, Robert G., Charles I. Plosser, James H. Stock, and Mark Watson (1991). Stochastic Trends and Economic Fluctuations. American Economic Review, 81, 819 -840.
16. Kydland, Finn and Edward Prescott (1982). Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica, 50, 1345-1370.
17. Shapiro, Matthew and Mark Watson (1988). Sources of Business Cycle Fluctuations. NBER, Macroeconomics Annual, 111 -148.
18. Shea, John (1998). What Do Technology Shocks Do? NBER Working Paper 6632.
19. Staiger, Douglas and James Stock (1997). Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments. Econometrica, 65, 557-586.
20. Uhlig, Harald (2004). Do Technology Shocks Lead to a Fall in Total Hours Worked? Journal ofthe European Economic Association, 2: 361 -371.
21. Vigfusson, Robert J. (2002). Why Does Employment Fall after a Positive Technology Shock? Working paper, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System.