What Do Technology Shocks Do?

NBER Macroeconomics Annual

Volumn 13, Issue , 1998, Pages 263-310

  Shea, John ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347503103     PISSN: 08893365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1086/ma.13.4623748     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baily, M., and R. Gordon (1988). The productivity slowdown, measurement issues and the explosion of computer power. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:347-431.
2. Bartlesman, E., and W. Gray. (1996). The NBER manufacturing productivity database. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Technical Working Paper 205.
3. Basu, S., and J. Fernald. (1997). Returns to scale in US production: Estimates and implications. Journal of Political Economy 105:249-283.
4. _, _, and M. Kimball. (1997). Are technology improvements contractionary? University of Michigan. Mimeo.
5. Berman, E., J. Bound, and Z. Griliches. (1994). Changes in the demand for skilled labor within U.S. manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:367-397.
6. Burnside, C., M. Eichenbaum, and S. Rebelo. (1995). Capital utilization and returns to scale. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1995, B. Bernanke and J. Rotemberg (eds.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 67-110.
7. _, _, and _. (1996). Sectoral Solow residuals. European Economic Review 40:861-869.
8. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. (1994). The cleansing effect of recessions. American Economic Review 84:1350-1368.
9. _, and _. (1996). On the timing and efficiency of creative destruction. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111:805-852.
10. Carlstrom, C., and T. Fuerst. (1997). Agency costs, net worth and business fluctuations: A computable general equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review 87:893-910.
11. Christiano, L., and M. Eichenbaum. (1992). Current real business cycle theory and aggregate labor market fluctuations. American Economic Review 82:430-450.
12. _, and _. (1995). Liquidity effects, monetary policy and the business cycle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27:1113-1136.
13. _, _, and C. Evans. (1998). Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 6400.
14. Cochrane, J. (1994). Shocks. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 41:296-364.
15. Cogley, T., and J. Nason (1995). Output dynamics in real business cycle models. American Economic Review 85:492-511.
16. DeLong, B., and L. Summers. (1991). Equipment investment and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106:445-502.
17. Evans, C. (1992). Productivity shocks and real business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 29:191-208.
18. Farmer, R., and J.-T. Guo. (1994). Real business cycles and the animal spirits hypothesis. Journal of Economic Theory 63:42-72.
19. Friedman, M., and A. Schwartz. (1963). A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. Galí, J. (1996). Technology, employment and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 5721. American Economic Review, forthcoming.
21. _, and M. Hammour. (1992). Long run effects of business cycles. Mimeo.
22. Gordon, R. (1990). The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Gort, M., and S. Klepper. (1982). Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal 92:630-653.
24. Greenwood, J., and M. Yorukoglu. (1997). 1974. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 46:49-95.
25. Griliches, Z. (1973). Research expenditures and growth accounting. In Science and Technology in Economic Growth, B. R. Williams (ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 59-83.
26. _. (1989). Patents: Recent trends and puzzles. Brookings Papers: Microeconomics, 291-319.
27. _, and F. Lichtenberg. (1984). R&D and productivity growth at the industry level: Is there still a relationship? In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Zvi Griliches (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 465-501.
28. Hall, R. (1988). The relation between price and marginal cost in US industry. Journal of Political Economy 96:921-947.
29. Hornstein, A., and P. Krusell. (1996). Can technology improvements cause productivity slowdowns? In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1996, B. Bernanke and J. Rotemberg (eds.). Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 209-259.
30. Horvath, M. (1997). Cyclicality and sectoral linkages: Aggregate fluctuations from independent sectoral shocks. Stanford University. Mimeo.
31. Jorgenson, D., F. Gollop, and B. Fraumeni. (1987). Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. Jovanovic, B., and S. Lach. (1997). Product innovation and the business cycle. International Economic Review 38:3-22.
33. Keller, W. (1997). Trade and the transmission of technology. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 6113.
34. Kimball, M. (1995). The quantitative analytics of the basic neomonetarist model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27:1241-1289.
35. Kortum, S. (1993). Equilibrium R&D and the patent-R&D ratio: US evidence. American Economic Review 83(May):450-457.
36. _, and J. Putnam. (1997). Assigning patents to industries: Tests of the Yale Technology Concordance. Economic Systems Research 9:161-175.
37. Krusell, P., L. Ohanian, J. V. Rios-Rull, and G. Violante. (1996). Capital-skill complementarity and inequality. University of Rochester. Mimeo.
38. Kydland, F., and E. Prescott. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50:1345-1370.
39. Lach, S. (1995). Patents and productivity growth at the industry level: A first look. Economics Letters 49:101-108.
40. _, and R. Rob. (1996). R&D, investment and industry dynamics. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 5:217-249.
41. _, and M. Schankerman. (1989). Dynamics of R&D and investment in the scientific sector. Journal of Political Economy 97:880-904.
42. Levin, A., and C.-F. Lin. (1992). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. University of California, San Diego. Mimeo.
43. Lichtenberg, F., and D. Siegel. (1991). The impact of R&D investment on productivity - new evidence using linked R&D-LRD data. Economic Inquiry 29:203-228.
44. Long, J., and C. Plosser. (1983). Real business cycles. Journal of Political Economy 91:39-69.
45. Prescott, E. (1986). Theory ahead of business cycle measurement. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10:9-22.
46. Quah, D. (1989). Permanent and transitory movements in labor income: An explanation for "excess smoothness" in consumption. Journal of Political Economy 98:449-475.
47. Rotemberg, J., and M. Woodford. (1995). Dynamic general equilibrium models with imperfectly competitive product markets. In Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, Thomas Cooley (ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 243-293.
48. Scherer, F. (1984). Using linked patent and R&D data to measure interindustry technology flows. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Z. Griliches (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 417-464.
49. _. (1993). Lagging productivity growth: Measurement, technology and shock effects. Empirica 20:5-24.
50. Schmitt-Grohe, S. (1997). Comparing four models of aggregate fluctuations due to self-fulfilling expectations. Journal of Economic Theory 72:96-147.
51. Shea, J. (1991). The input-output approach to instrument selection: Technical appendix. University of Maryland. Mimeo.
52. _. (1993). The input-output approach to instrument selection. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11:145-154.
53. _. (1998). What do technology shocks do? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper no. 6632, July.
54. Stadler, G. (1990). Business cycle models with endogenous technology. American Economic Review 80:763-778.
55. Terleckyj, N. (1975). Direct and indirect effects of industrial research and development on the productivity growth of industries. In New Developments in Productivity Measurement, J. Kendrick and B. Vaccara (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 359-386.