Multiple criteria decision analysis with consideration to place-specific values in participatory forest planning

Silva Fennica

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 253-265

  Nordström, Eva Maria ^a   Eriksson, Ljusk Ola ^a   Öhman, Karin ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Decision support; Forest management; Public participation; Spatial planning

Indexed keywords

DECISION SITUATION; DECISION SUPPORTS; FOREST PLANNING; FOREST PLANNING PROBLEMS; FOREST STAND; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; PARTICIPATORY PLANNING; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SILVICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL GROUPS; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER VALUES; URBAN FORESTS;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FORESTRY;

DECISION THEORY;

DECISION ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MAP; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SILVICULTURE; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER; STAND STRUCTURE; URBAN AREA;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; SWEDEN;

SWEDEN;

EID: 79959878467     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ananda, J. 2007. Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning. Environmental Management 39(4): 534-544.
2. Ananda, J & Herath, G. 2003a. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics 45(1): 75-90.
3. Ananda, J & Herath, G. 2003b. The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics 5(1): 13-26.
4. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Jankowski, P., Keim, D., Kraak, M.-J., MacEachren, A. & Wrobel, S. 2007. Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21(8): 839-857.
5. Ansell, C. & Gash, A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory 18(4): 543-571.
6. Belton, V. & Stewart, T.J. 2002. Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 372 p.
7. Bengston, D.N. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society & Natural Resources 7(6): 515-533.
8. Carpiano, R.M. 2009. Come take a walk with me: The"Go-Along" interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place 15(1): 263-272.
9. Checkland, P. 1981. Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 330 p.
10. Cheng, A. & Mattor, K. 2006. Why won't they come? Stakeholder perspectives on collaborative national forest planning by participation level. Environmental Management 38(4): 545-561.
11. Garmendia, E. & Stagl, S. 2010. Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological Economics 69(8): 1712-1722.
12. Geneletti, D. & van Duren, I. 2008. Protected area zoning for conservation and use: A combination of spatial multicriteria and multiobjective evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning 85(2): 97-110.
13. Hiltunen, V., Kangas, J. & Pykäläinen, J. 2008. Voting methods in strategic forest planning - experiences from Metsähallitus. Forest Policy and Economics 10(3): 117-127.
14. Hwang, C.L. & Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications: a state-ofthe- art survey. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 259 p.
15. Hytönen, L.A., Leskinen, P. & Store, R. 2002. A spatial approach to participatory planning in forestry decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17(1): 62-71.
16. Kangas, A., Kangas, J. & Pykäläinen, J. 2001. Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning. Silva Fennica 35(2): 215-227.
17. Kangas, A., Kangas, J. & Pykäläinen, J, Haapakoski, R. & Tyrväinen, L. 2008. Integrating place-specific social values into forest planning - case of UPM-Kymmene forests in Hyrynsalmi, Finland. Silva Fennica 42(5): 773-790.
18. Kangas, J. 1994. An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning. Forest Ecology and Management 70(1-3): 75-88.
19. Kangas, J, Store, R. & Kangas, A. 2005. Socioecological landscape planning approach and multicriteria acceptability analysis in multiple-purpose forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 7(4): 603-614.
20. Keeney, R.L. 1992. Value-focused thinking - a path to creative decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 416 p.
21. Laukkanen, S., Palander, T. & Kangas, J. 2004. Applying voting theory in participatory decision support for sustainable timber harvesting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34(7): 1511-1524.
22. Lindhagen, A. & Hörnsten, L. 2000. Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: changes in public preferences and behaviour. Forestry 73(2): 143-153.
23. Malczewski, J. 2006. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(7): 703-726.
24. Maness, T. & Farrell, R. 2004. A multi-objective scenario evaluation model for sustainable forest management using criteria and indicators. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34(10): 2004-2017.
25. Nordström, E.-M., Eriksson, L.O. & Öhman, K. 2010. Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics 12(8): 562-574.
26. Pykäläinen, J., Kangas, J. & Loikkanen, T. 1999. Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: Experiences from state owned boreal forests. Journal of Forest Economics 5(3): 341-364.
27. Pykäläinen, J., Kangas, J. & Loikkanen, T, Hiltunen, V. & Leskinen, P. 2007. Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: Experiences gained from western Finland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37(5): 853-865.
28. Saarikoski, H., Tikkanen, J. & Leskinen, L.A. 2010. Public participation in practice - assessing public participation in the preparation of regional forest programs in northern Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 12(5): 349-356.
29. Saaty, T.L. 1990. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. 287 p.
30. Sheppard, S.R.J. & Meitner, M. 2005. Using multicriteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 207(1-2): 171-187.
31. Store, R. 2009. Sustainable locating of different forest uses. Land Use Policy 26(3): 610-618.
32. Ståhle, A. 2000. Sociotop som redskap i grönområdesplanering. Stockholms stad, Stadsbyggnadskontoret, Stockholm. 58 p. (In Swedish).
33. Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K. & Schipperijn, J. 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1): 5-19.
34. Williams, D.R. & Stewart, S.I. 1998. Sense of place: an elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry 96: 18-23.