Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning

Environmental Management

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 534-544

  Ananda, Jayanath ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Australia; Forest land use decisions; Public participation; Public policy; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

FOREST POLICY DECISIONS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL VALUE POSITIONS; STAKEHOLDERS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FORESTRY; LAND USE; NATURAL RESOURCES; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST RESOURCE; GLOBALIZATION; LAND USE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; POLICY MAKING; RESOURCE USE; STAKEHOLDER;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; AWARENESS; CASE STUDY; COMMUNITY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; FOREST; MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; POLITICAL SYSTEM; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIETY;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FORESTRY; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; VICTORIA;

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FORESTRY; LAND USE; NATURAL RESOURCES;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

EID: 33947313499     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0031-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ananda J (2004) Multiple criteria decision making in forest management: an application to the North East Victoria forest Region in Australia. Ph.D. thesis, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
2. Antunes P, Santos R, Videira N (2006) Participatory decision making for sustainable development-the use of mediated modelling techniques. Land Use Policy 23:44-52
3. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners 35:216-224
4. Bojrquez-Tapia LA, Sánchez-Colon S, Martinez AF (2005) Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modelling and sensitivity analysis. Environ Manage 36:469-481
5. Bouma J, Brouwer R, van Ek R (2000) The use of integrated assessment methods in Dutch water management: a comparison of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis. Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, 3-6 May 2000
6. Buchy M, Hoverman S (2000) Understanding public participation: a review. Forest Policy Econ 1:15-25
7. Clark J (2004) Forest policy for sustainable commodity wood production: an examination drawing on the Australian experience. Ecol Econ 50:219-232
8. Commonwealth of Australia (1992) National Forest Policy Statement, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service
9. Commonwealth of Australia (1999) Northeast Victoria Comprehensive Regional Assessment. Joint Commonwealth and Victorian Regional Forest Agreement Steering Committee: Canberra
10. Creighton J (1986) Managing conflicts in public involvement settings: training manual for Bonneville Power Administration. Palo Alto, California. Creighton and Creighton, Los Gatos, CA
11. Dargavel J, Proctor W, Kanowski P (2000) Conflict and agreement in Australian forests. In: Tacconi L (ed), Biodiversity and ecological economics: participation, values and resource management, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London
12. Duke JM, Aull-Hyde R (2002) Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecol Econom 42:131-145
13. Grimble R, Chan MK (1995) Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries: some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Natural Resources Forum 19:113-124
14. Hair JF, Bush RP, Ortinau DJ (2000) Marketing research: a practical approach for the new millennium. McGraw-Hill Publications, Boston, pp 325-368
15. Harrison SR, Qureshi ME (2000) Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multi-criteria decision models. Nat Resources Forum 24:11-19
16. Healey J (2002) The forestry debate, issues in society, volume 168. The Spinney Press, Sydney
17. Kant S (2003) Extending the boundaries of forest economics. Forest Economics Policy 5:39-56
18. Kant S, Lee S (2004) A social choice approach to sustainable forest management: an analysis of multiple forest values in Northwestern Ontario. Forest Policy Economics 6:215-227
19. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, New York
20. Kirkpatrick JB (1998) Nature conservation and the regional forest agreement process. Austral J Environ Manage 5:31-37
21. Korfmacher KS (2001) The politics of participation in watershed modeling. Environ Manage 27:161-176
22. Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2000) Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis - a hybrid method and its applications to a forest certification case. Forest Policy Econ 1:41-52
23. Mardle S, Pascoe S, Herrero I (2004) Management objective importance in fisheries: an evaluation using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Environ Manage 33:1-11
24. Mendoza G, Prabhu R (2000) Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: a case study. Forest Ecol Manage 131:107-126
25. Mendoza G, Prabhu R (2005) Combining participatory modeling and multiple-criteria analysis for community-based forest management. Forest Ecol Manage 207:145-156
26. Mobbs C (2003) National forest policy and regional forest agreements. In: Dovers S, River SW (eds.) Managing Australia's environment. The Federation Press, Sydney
27. Rosenberger RS (1998) Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs: comment. Land Economics 74:557-565
28. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234-281
29. Schmoldt DL, Kangas JK, Mendoza GA (2001) Basic principles of decision making in natural resources and the environment. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas JK, Mendoza GA, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 1-13
30. Sheppard SRJ (2005) Participatory decision support for sustainable forest management: a framework for planning with local communities at the landscape level in Canada. Can J Forest Res 35:1515-1526
31. Slee B (2001) Resolving production-environment conflicts: the case of the Regional Forest Agreement Process in Australia. Forest Policy Econ 3:17-30
32. Striegnitz M (2006) Conflicts over coastal protection in a national park: mediation and negotiated law making. Land Use Policy 23:26-33
33. Tacconi L (2000) Economics, land use planning and participation. In: Tacconi L, (eds) Biodiversity and ecological economics: participation, values and resource management. Earthscan Publications, London, pp 77-98
34. Timney MM, Kelly TP (2000) New public management and the demise of popular sovereignity. Admin Theory Praxis 22:555-569
35. van den Hove S (2000) Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: the European Commission Climate Policy Process as a case study. Ecol Econ 33:457-472
36. Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, DC