Integrating place-specific social values into forest planning - Case of UPM-Kymmene forests in Hyrynsalmi, Finland

Silva Fennica

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 773-790

  Kangas, Annika ^a   Haapakoski, Ruut ^a   Tyrväinen, Liisa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Collaborative planning; Experienced values of forests; Social value mapping; Survey

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; FORESTRY; RURAL AREAS; SURVEYING; SURVEYS;

COLLABORATIVE PLANNING; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; EXPERIENCED VALUES OF FORESTS; FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY PROCESS; PUBLIC MEETINGS; SOCIAL VALUE MAPPING; SPECIFIC INFORMATION;

MAPPING;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MAPPING METHOD; PLANNING METHOD; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RURAL AREA; SURVEY; URBAN AREA; VALUATION;

DATA PROCESSING; FINLAND; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTS; MAPPING; PLANNING; SURVEYS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; HYRYNSALMI; NORTHERN EUROPE; OULU [FINLAND]; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 59849084145     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.467     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bell, S.,Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T., Pröebstl, U. & Simpson, M. 2007. Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: trends, conflicts and research needs - a European perspective. Living reviews in landscape research. Available at http://landscaperesearch.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrlr-2007-2/
2. Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F. & Bonnes, M. 2003. Indexes of perceived residential environmental quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome. Lanscape & Urban Planning 65: 41-52.
3. Brown, G. 2006. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. International journal of tourism research 8: 101-113.
4. Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 129-138.
5. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stake-holder approach. Pitman, Boston, MA.
6. Heberlein, T.A. 1976. Some observations on alternative mechanisms for public involvement: The hearing, public opinion poll, the workshop and the quasi-experiment. Natural Resources Journal 16: 197-212.
7. Hiltunen, V., Kangas, J. & Pykäläinen, J. 2008. Voting methods in strategic forest planning - Experiences from Metsähallitus. Forest Policy and Economics 10: 117-127.
8. Hytönen, L.A., Leskinen, P. & Store, R. 2002. A spatial approach to participatory planning in forestry decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17: 62-71.
9. International Labour Office 2000. Public participation in forestry in Europe and North America. Report of the FAO/ECE/ILO Joint Committee Team of Specialists on participation in Forestry. International Labour Office, Geneva.
10. Janse, G. & Konijnendijk, C.C. 2007. Communication between science, policy and citizens in public participation in urban forestry - Experiences from the Neighborwoods project. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 6: 23-40.
11. Karjalainen, E. 2006. The visual preferences for forest regeneration and field afforestation - four case studies in Finland. University of Helsinki, Faculty of Biosciences. Dissertationes Forestales 31. 111 p. Available at http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes/df31.htm.
12. Kuntien virkistys-ja ulkoilumetsät 2007. In: Syrjänen, K., Horne, P., Koskela, T. & Kumela, H. (eds.). METSOn seuranta ja arviointi. Etelä-Suomen metsien monimuotoisuusohjelman seurannan ja arvioinnin loppuraportti. p. 206-210. (In Finnish).
13. Lauber, B.T. & Knuth, B.A. 1998. Refining our vision of citizen participation: lessons from a moose reintroduction project. Society & Natural Resources 11: 411-424.
14. Loikkanen, T., Simojoki, T. & Wallenius, P. 1997. Osallistavan suunnittelun opas luonnonvara-ammattilaisille. Metsähallitus. 96 p. (In Finnish).
15. O'Riordan, J. 1976. The public involvement program in the Okangan basin study. In: Utton, A.E., Sewell, W.R.D. & O'Riordan, T. (eds.). Natural resources for a democratic society: public participation in decision-making. Westview, Boulder CO.
16. Pelkonen, J. & Tyrväinen, L. 2005. Kaupunkiviheralueiden koetut arvot ja merkitykset asukkaille Länsi-Vantaalla. Helsingin yliopisto, metsäekologian laitos. 59 p. + appendix. (in Finnish).
17. Pykäläinen, J., Kangas, J. & Loikkanen, T. 1999. Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: Experiences from State owned boreal forests. Journal of Forest Economics 5: 341-364.
18. Pykäläinen, Hiltunen, V. & Leskinen, P. 2007. Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences gained from western Finland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 853-865.
19. Reed, P. & Brown, G. 2003. Values suitability analysis: a methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of forest ecosystem values in national forest planning. Journal of environmental planning and management 46(5): 643-658.
20. Regionplane -och trafikkontoret. 2001. Upplevelsevärden, Sociala kvaliteter I den regionala grönstrukturen. Rapport 4. Katarina Tryck AB, Stockholm. ISSN 1104-1604. (In Swedish).
21. Ståhle, A. 2000. Sociotop som redskap i grönområdesplanering. Stadsbyggnads kontoret. 58 s. (In Swedish).
22. Silvennoinen, H. & Tyrväinen, L. 2001. Luon-tomatkailun kysyntä Suomessa ja asiakkaiden ympäristötoiveet. In: Sievänen, T. (ed.). Luonnon virkistyskäyttö 2000. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 802: 112-127. (In Finnish).
23. Silvennoinen, H., Pukkala, T. & Tahvanainen, L. 2002. The effect of cuttings on the scenic beauty of a tree stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17: 263-273.
24. Tikkanen, J. 1996. Taajametsien osallistava suunnittelu. Kokemuksia MetsäRaahe -suunnitteluprojektista. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 603. (In Finnish).
25. Tyrväinen, L., Nousiainen, I., Silvenoinen, H. & Tahvanainen, L. 2001. Rural tourism in Finland: Tourists expectation of landscape and environment. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research. 1(2): 133-149.
26. Tyrväinen, L., Silvenoinen, H., Tahvanainen, L., Silvennoinen, H. & Kolehmainen O. 2003. Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 1(3): 135-149.
27. Tyrväinen, L., Pauleit, S., Seeland, K. & de Vries, S. 2005. Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees. In: Nilsson, K., Randrup, T.B. & Konijnendijk, C.C. (eds.). Urban forests and trees in Europe. A reference book. Springer Verlag. p. 81-114.
28. Tyrväinen, L., Mäkinen, K. & Schipperijn, J. 2007a. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1): 5-19
29. Tyrväinen, L., Hietala, R., Silvennoinen, H. & Sipilä, M. 2007b. Maisema asukkaiden silmin. Tapaus Koskenkylässä ja Pernajanlahdella. Ympäristöministeriön julkaisuja. Suomen Ymparistö 25. 56 p. Available at: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid =72968&land=fi.
30. Van Herzele, A., Collins, K. & Tyrväinen, L. 2005. Involving people in urban forestry. A discussion of participatory practices throughout Europe. In: Nilsson, K., Randrup, T.B. & Konijnendijk, C.C. (eds.). Urban forests and trees in Europe. A reference book. Springer Verlag. p. 207-228.
31. Wallenius, P. 2001. Osallistava strateginen suunnittelu julkisten luonnonvarojen hoidossa. Metsähallituksen metsätalouden julkaisuja 41. (In Finnish).
32. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H. & Renn, O. 1995. Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environmental Impact assessment Review 15: 443-463.