Individual and practice differences among physicians who perform ERCP at varying frequency: A national survey

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 65-73.e12

  Coté, Gregory A ^a   Keswani, Rajesh N ^b   Jackson, Tina ^a   Fogel, Evan ^a   Lehman, Glen A ^a   McHenry, Lee ^a   Watkins, James ^a   Sherman, Stuart ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; BILE LEAKAGE; CANNULATION; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GASTROENTEROLOGIST; GUIDE WIRE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEEDLE KNIFE SPHINCTEROTOMY; PANCREAS DIVISUM; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREATIC DUCT STENTING; PANCREATITIS; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPHINCTEROTOMY; STENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNITED STATES; WORK EXPERIENCE;

EID: 79959738190     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.072     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. R.J. Farrell, N. Noonan, and N. Mahmud Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain Endoscopy 33 2001 668 675 (Pubitemid 32725158)
2. M. Mazen Jamal, E.J. Yoon, and A. Saadi Trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 966 975 (Pubitemid 46698233)
3. N. Alhayaf, E. Lalor, and V. Bain The clinical impact and cost implication of endoscopic ultrasound on use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a Canadian university hospital Can J Gastroenterol 22 2008 138 142
4. S. Varadarajulu, M.L. Kilgore, and C.M. Wilcox Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes Gastrointest Endosc 64 2006 338 347 (Pubitemid 44233560)
5. T.H. Baron, B.T. Petersen, and K. Mergener Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 S29 S34
6. M.L. Freeman, J.A. DiSario, and D.B. Nelson Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 54 2001 425 434 (Pubitemid 33661145)
7. E.J. Williams, S. Taylor, and P. Fairclough Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study Endoscopy 39 2007 793 801 (Pubitemid 47386828)
8. J.B. Colton, and C.C. Curran Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study Gastrointest Endosc 70 2009 457 467
9. M.L. Freeman, D.B. Nelson, and S. Sherman Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy N Engl J Med 335 1996 909 918 (Pubitemid 26314443)
10. T. Rabenstein, H.T. Schneider, and M. Nicklas Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques Gastrointest Endosc 50 1999 628 636 (Pubitemid 29518043)
11. C. Kapral, C. Duller, and F. Wewalka Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project Endoscopy 40 2008 625 630
12. R.J. Hilsden, J. Romagnuolo, and G.R. May Patterns of use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a Canadian province Can J Gastroenterol 18 2004 619 624 (Pubitemid 39530067)
13. J.F. Johanson, G. Cooper, and G.M. Eisen Quality assessment of ERCP Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography Gastrointest Endosc 56 2002 165 169
14. P.S. Jowell, J. Baillie, and M.S. Branch Quantitative assessment of procedural competence A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Ann Intern Med 125 1996 983 989 (Pubitemid 26424528)
15. R.K. Chutkan, A.S. Ahmad, and J. Cohen ERCP core curriculum Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 361 376
16. G.M. Eisen, J.A. Dominitz, and D.O. Faigel Guidelines for advanced endoscopic training Gastrointest Endosc 53 2001 846 848
17. S.M. Schutz, and R.M. Abbott Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 535 539 (Pubitemid 30322335)
18. M.C. Allison, D.N. Ramanaden, and M.G. Fouweather Provision of ERCP services and training in the United Kingdom Endoscopy 32 2000 693 699
19. E.J. Williams, S. Taylor, and P. Fairclough Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice Gut 56 2007 821 829 (Pubitemid 46854199)
20. M.M. Schlup, S.M. Williams, and G.O. Barbezat ERCP: a review of technical competency and workload in a small unit Gastrointest Endosc 46 1997 48 52 (Pubitemid 27430362)
21. J. Garcia-Cano Lizcano, and J.A. Gonzalez Martin Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography A study in a small ERCP unit Rev Esp Enferm Dig 96 2004 163 173 (Pubitemid 38514890)
22. J.C. Yarze, K.J. Herlihy, and M.P. Chase ERCP experience in a community-based, private-practice setting Am J Gastroenterol 95 2000 3006 3007
23. J.M. Dumonceau, A. Andriulli, and J. Deviere European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis Endoscopy 42 2010 503 515
24. D. Garrow, and P. Cotton ERCP Quality Network: benchmarking U.S. practice and performance by experience Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1
25. P.A. Testoni, A. Mariani, and A. Giussani Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1753 1761
26. P. Wang, Z.S. Li, and F. Liu Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 104 2009 31 40
27. C.L. Cheng, S. Sherman, and J.L. Watkins Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 139 147 (Pubitemid 43381722)
28. R.J. Shah, L. Somogyi, and B.T. Petersen Short-wire ERCP systems Gastrointest Endosc 66 2007 650 657 (Pubitemid 47464264)
29. T.H. Lee, D.H. Park, and J.Y. Park Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 444 449
30. E.L. Artifon, P. Sakai, and J.E. Cunha Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 2147 2153 (Pubitemid 47493831)
31. F. Lella, F. Bagnolo, and E. Colombo A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis Gastrointest Endosc 59 2004 830 834 (Pubitemid 38879310)
32. J. Vandervoort, R.M. Soetikno, and T.C. Tham Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP Gastrointest Endosc 56 2002 652 656 (Pubitemid 36531698)
33. A.M. Saad, E.L. Fogel, and L. McHenry Pancreatic duct stent placement prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction but normal manometry results Gastrointest Endosc 67 2008 255 261
34. A. Fazel, A. Quadri, and M.F. Catalano Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study Gastrointest Endosc 57 2003 291 294 (Pubitemid 36350781)
35. S. Sherman, D.T. Earle, and L. Bucksot Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy (ES)-induced pancreatitis? A final analysis of a randomized prospective study [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 43 1996 A489
36. A. Smithline, W. Silverman, and D. Rogers Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients Gastrointest Endosc 39 1993 652 657 (Pubitemid 23282518)
37. J.M. Dumonceau, J. Rigaux, and M. Kahaleh Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a practice survey Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 934 939 9 e1-2
38. E.M. Abu-Hamda, T.H. Baron, and D.T. Simmons A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation J Clin Gastroenterol 39 2005 717 721 (Pubitemid 41177093)
39. G.A. Cote, M. Ansstas, and R. Pawa Difficult biliary cannulation: use of physician-controlled wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic duct stent to reduce the rate of precut sphincterotomy (with video) Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 275 279
40. E. Goldberg, M. Titus, and O. Haluszka Pancreatic-duct stent placement facilitates difficult common bile duct cannulation Gastrointest Endosc 62 2005 592 596 (Pubitemid 41383782)