Effects of novelty on event-related potentials: Aging and stimulus replacement

Gerontology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 364-374

  Pató, Lívia ^a,b   Czigler, István ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; N2b complex; Novel stimuli; P3a complex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COHORT STUDIES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959646448     PISSN: 0304324X     EISSN: 14230003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000314159     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Sokolov YN: Perception and the Conditioned Reflex. Oxford, Pergamon, 1963.
2. Katayama J, Polich J: Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology 1998; 35: 23-33. (Pubitemid 28036078)
3. Polich J, Comerchero MD: P3a from visual stimuli: typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topogr 2003; 15:141-152. (Pubitemid 36423050)
4. Sawaki R, Katayama J: Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117:2532-2539. (Pubitemid 44548499)
5. Posner MI, Boies SJ: Components of attention. Psychol Rev 1971; 78: 391-408.
6. Folstein JR, van Petten C: Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiol-ogy 2008; 45:152-170. (Pubitemid 350233271)
7. Näätänen R, Picton TW: N2 and automatic versus controlled processes; in McCallum WC, Zapolli R, Denoth I (eds): Cerebral Psychophysiology: Studies in Event-Related Potentials, EEG suppl 39. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1986, pp 169-189.
8. Weisz J, Czigler I: Age and novelty: event-related brain potentials and autonomic activity. Psychophysiology 2006; 43: 261-271. (Pubitemid 43927342)
9. Kotchoubey BI, Jordan JS, Grözinger B, Westphal KO, Kornhuber HH: Event-related brain potentials in a varied-set memory search task: a reconsideration. Psychophysiology 1996; 33: 530-540. (Pubitemid 26305111)
10. Wang Y, Tian S, Wang H, Cui L, Zhang Y, Zhang X: Event-related potentials evoked by muli-feature conflict under different attentive conditions. Exp Brain Res 2003; 148: 451-457. (Pubitemid 36259455)
11. Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoomann J: Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92:148-160. (Pubitemid 24097608)
12. Fox AM, Michie PT, Wynne CD, Maybery MT: ERP correlates of response inhibition to elemental and configural stimuli in a negative patterning task. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111:1045-1053. (Pubitemid 30316344)
13. Kok A, Ramautar JR, De Ruiter MB, Band GP, Ridderinkhof KR: ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:9-20. (Pubitemid 38209024)
14. Heil M, Osman A, Wiegelmann J, Rolke B, Hennighausen E: N200 in the Eriksen-task: inhibitory executive process? J Psychophysiol 2000; 14:218-225. (Pubitemid 32237044)
15. Bartholow BD, Pearson MA, Dickter CL, Sher KJ, Fabiani M, Gratton G: Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict. Psychophysiol-ogy 2005; 42:33-42. (Pubitemid 40395413)
16. Boenke LT, Ohl FW, Nikolaev AR, Lach-mann T, Leeuwen C: Different time courses of Stroop and Garner effects in perception - an event-related potentials study. Neuro-Image 2009; 45:1272-1288.
17. Comerchero MD, Polich J: P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1998; 7:41-48. (Pubitemid 28419437)
18. Demiralp T, Ademoglu A, Comerchero M, Polich J: Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b. Brain Topogr 2001; 13: 251-267. (Pubitemid 32762085)
19. Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Dziobek I: Cross-form conceptual relations between sounds and words: effects on the novelty P3. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 18: 58-64. (Pubitemid 37500975)
20. Simons RF, Graham FK, Miles MA, Chen X: On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3. Biol Psychol 2001; 56: 207-218. (Pubitemid 33713458)
21. Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E: Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhibit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiolo-gy 2004; 41:665-678. (Pubitemid 39295493)
22. Czigler I, Pató L, Poszet E, Balázs L: Age and novelty: event-related potentials to visual stimuli within an auditory oddball - visual detection task. Int J Psychophysiol 2006; 62: 290-299. (Pubitemid 44441610)
23. Friedman D, Kazmerski vA, Cycowicz YM: Effects of aging on the novelty P3 during attend and ignore oddball tasks. Psychophysiology 1998; 35: 508-520. (Pubitemid 28376058)
24. Gaeta H, Friedman D, Ritter W, Cheng J: An event-related potential evaluation of involuntary attentional shifts in young and older adults. Psychol Aging 2001; 16:55-68. (Pubitemid 32232976)
25. Fjell AM, Walhovd KB: Life-span changes in P3a. Psychophysiology 2004; 41:575-583. (Pubitemid 38885693)
26. Czigler I, Balázs L: Age-related effects of novel visual stimuli in a letter-matching task: an event-related potential study. Biol Psychol 2005; 69:229-242. (Pubitemid 40445403)
27. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J: Inhibition-related ERP components: variation with modality, age and time-on-task. Journal of Psychophysiology 2002; 16: 167-175. (Pubitemid 35314864)
28. Hasher L, Zacks RT: Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view; in: Bower, GG (ed): The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. San Diego, Academic Press, 1988, vol 22, pp 193-225.
29. Proctor RW: A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. Psychol Rev 1981; 88:291-326.
30. Kun M, Szegedi M: Az intelligencia mérése. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó, 1977, pp 227-351.
31. Pascual-Marqui RD: Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2002; 24:5-12. (Pubitemid 35462350)
32. Tecce JT, Cattanach L: Contingent negative variation (CNv); in Niedermeyer E, da Silva L (eds): Electroecephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1993, pp 887-910.
33. Krueger LE, Allen PA: Same-different judgments of foveal and parafoveal letter pairs by older adults. Percept Psychophys 1987; 41: 329-334.
34. Talsma D, Kok A, Ridderinkhof KR: Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data. Int J Psychophysiol 2006; 62: 249-261. (Pubitemid 44441606)
35. Townsend J, Adamo M, Haist F: Changing channels: an fMRI study of aging and cross-modal attention shifts. NeuroImage 2006; 31: 1682-1692.
36. Eimer M: Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/Nogo task. Biol Psychol 1993; 35: 123-138. (Pubitemid 23131163)
37. Szucs D, Soltész F, Czigler I, Csépe v: Electroencephalography effects to semantic and non-semantic mismatch in properties of visually presented single-characters: the N2b and the N400. Neurosci Lett 2007; 412:18-23. (Pubitemid 46038547)
38. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J: Changes of error related ERPs with age. Exp Brain Res 2001; 138: 258-262. (Pubitemid 32441887)
39. Band GP, Kok A: Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task. Biol Psychol 2000; 51: 201-221. (Pubitemid 30109230)
40. Eriksen CW, O'Hara WP, Eriksen B: Response competition effectcts in same-different judgements. Percept and Psychophys 1982; 32: 261-270.
41. Rabbitt P, Lowe C, Shilling v: Frontal tests and models for cognitive aging. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2001; 13: 5-28. (Pubitemid 32367199)
42. Czigler I, Csibra G, Ambró á: Aging, stimulus identification and the effect of probability: an event-related potential study. Biol Psy-chol 1996; 43:27-40. (Pubitemid 26145605)
43. Fjell AM, Walhovd KB et al: Age-dependent changes in distribution of P3a/P3b amplitude and thickness of the cerebral cortex. Neuroreport 2005; 16:1451-1454. (Pubitemid 41805662)
44. Polich J: Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. Psychophysiology 1996; 33: 334-353. (Pubitemid 26230719)
45. Nieuwenhuis S, Broerse A, Nielen MM, de Jong R: A goal activation approach to the study of executive function: an application to antisaccade tasks. Brain Cogn 2004; 56: 198-214. (Pubitemid 39423882)
46. Bertoli S, Smurzynski J, Probst R: Effects of age, age-related hearing loss, and contralat-eral cafeteria noise on the discrimination of small frequency changes: psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measures. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005; 6:207-222.
47. Daffner KR, Ryan KK, Williams DM, Budson AE, Rentz DM, Wolk DA, Holcomb PJ: Age-related differences in attention to novelty among cognitively high performing adults. Biol Psychol 2006; 72:67-77. (Pubitemid 43331018)
48. Escera C, Alho K, Schröger E, Winkler I: Involuntary attention and discratibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:151-166. (Pubitemid 30312184)
49. Hagen GF, Gatherwright JR, Lopez BA, Polich J: P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty ef fects. Int J of Psychophysiol 2006; 59: 8-14. (Pubitemid 43081881)
50. Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H: The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001; 25: 355-373. (Pubitemid 32624376)
51. Horváth J, Winkler I, Bendixen A: Do N1/ MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain ref lecting the three stages of auditor y distraction? Biol Psychol 2008; 79: 139-147.
52. Spencer KM, Dien J, Donchin E: Spatiotem-poral analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology 2001; 38: 343-358. (Pubitemid 32267775)