Determining optimum conditions for lipase-catalyzed synthesis of triethanolamine (TEA)-based esterquat cationic surfactant by a Taguchi robust design method

Molecules

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 4672-4680

  Masoumi, Hamid Reza Fard ^a   Kassim, Anuar ^a   Basri, Mahiran ^a   Abdullah, Dzulkifly Kuang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Biosynthesis; Cationic surfactant; Esterquat; Optimization; Taguchi design

Indexed keywords

CATION; ETHANOLAMINE DERIVATIVE; OLEIC ACID; SURFACTANT; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE; TRIETHANOLAMINE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYNTHESIS;

CATALYSIS; CATIONS; CHEMISTRY; ETHANOLAMINES; LIPASE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLEIC ACID; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 79959581572     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14203049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/molecules16064672     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Miao, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Peng, L. Synthesis of biodegradable lauric acid ester quaternary ammonium salt cationic surfactant and its utilization as calico softener. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 3450-3452.
2. Guo, X.F.; Jia, L.H. Synthesis and Application of Cationic Surfactants; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2002.
3. Waters, J.; Kleiser, H.H.; How, M.J.; Barratt, M.D.; Birch, R.R.; Fletcher, R.J.; Haigh, S.D.; Hales, S.G.; Marshall, S.J.; Pestell, T.C. A new rinse conditioner active with improved environmental properties. Tenside Surfact. Det. 1991, 28, 460-468.
4. Puchta, R.; Krings, P.; Sandkuehler, P. A New Generation of Softeners. Tenside Surfact. Det. 1993, 30, 186-191.
5. Levinson, M. Rinse-added fabric softener technology at the close of the twentieth century. J. Surfact. Deterg. 1999, 2, 223-235. (Pubitemid 129685764)
6. Ebrahimiasl, S.; Yunus, W.M.Z.W.; Kassim, A.; Zainal, Z. Prediction of grain size, thickness and absorbance of nanocrystalline tin oxide thin film by Taguchi robust design. Solid State Sci. 2010, 12, 1323-1327.
7. Tsai, H.H.; Wu, D.H.; Chiang, T.L.; Chen, H.H. Robust Design of SAW Gas Sensors by Taguchi Dynamic Method. Sensors 2009, 9, 1394-1408.
8. Joo, Y.K.; Zhang, S.H.; Yoon, J.H.; Cho, T.Y. Optimization of the Adhesion Strength of Arc Ion Plating TiAlN Films by the Taguchi Method. Materials 2009, 2, 699-709.
9. Bolboac, S.D.; Jäntschi, L. Design of experiments: Useful orthogonal arrays for number of experiments from 4 to 16. Entropy 2007, 9, 198-232.
10. Aggarwal, A.; Singh, H.; Kumar, P.; Singh, M. Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi's technique-A comparative analysis. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2008, 200, 373-384. (Pubitemid 351318180)
11. Benyounis, K.; Olabi, A. Optimization of different welding processes using statistical and numerical approaches-A reference guide. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2008, 39, 483-496. (Pubitemid 351200032)
12. Phadke, S.M. Quality Engineering Using Robust Design; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1989.
13. Kackar, R.N. Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method. J. Qual. Technol. 1985, 17, 176-188.
14. Taguchi, G. Introduction to Quality Engineering; Asian Productivity Organization: Dearborn, MI, USA, 1986; Distributed by American Supplier Institute Inc.
15. Bendell, A. Introduction to Taguchi Methodology. In Taguchi Methods: Proceedings of the 1988 European Conference; Elsevier Applied Science: London, England, 1988.
16. ASI. Taguchi Methods: Implementation Manual; American Supplier Institute Inc (ASI): Dearborn, MI, USA, 1989.
17. Taguchi, G.; Konishi, S. Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs; American Supplier Institute Inc.: Dearborn, MI, USA, 1987.
18. Muralidhar, R.V.; Chirumamila, R.R.; Marchant, R. A response surface approach for the comparison of lipase production by Candida Cylindracea using two different carbon sources. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 9, 17-23. (Pubitemid 33029188)
19. Anderson, M.J.; Whitcomb, P.J. RSM Simplified: Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments; Productivity Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
20. Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
21. Yadav, R.; Srivastava, D. Studies on the process variables of the condensation reaction of cardanol and formaldehyde by response surface methodology. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 946-952.
22. Hamzaoui, A.H.; Jamoussi, B.; M'nif, A. Lithium recovery from highly concentrated solutions: Response surface Methodology (RSM) process parameters optimization. Hydrometallurgy 2008, 90, 1-7.
23. Li, Y.; Lu, J. Characterization of the enzymatic degradation of arabinoxylans in grist containing wheat malt using response surface methodology. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2005, 63, 171-176. (Pubitemid 41698192)
24. Beg, Q.; Sahai, V.; Gupta, R. Statistical media optimization and alkaline protease production from Bacillus mojavensis in bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2003, 39, 203-209. (Pubitemid 38033682)
25. Yuan, X.; Liu, J.; Zeng, G.; Shi, J.; Tong, J.; Huang, G. Optimization of conversion of waste rapeseed oil with high FFA to biodiesel using response surface methodology. Renew. Energy 2008, 33, 1678-1684. (Pubitemid 351417439)
26. Liu, J.Z.; Weng, L.P.; Zhang, Q.L. Optimization of glucose oxidase production by Aspergillus Niger in a benchtop bioreactor using response surface methodology. World J. Micro. Biotech. 2003, 19, 317-323.
27. Krishna, S.H.; Sattur, A.P.; Karanth, N.G. Lipase-catalysed synthesis of isoamly isobutyrateoptimisation using a central composite rotatable design. Process Biochem. 2001, 37, 9-16. (Pubitemid 32843561)