Conditions for framework legislation

The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 294-319

  Garrett, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959428704     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511511035.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961), Chapter 5.
2. Richard S. Beth, Congressional Research Service Specialist in the Legislative Process, Statutory Procedures Limiting Debate (June 3, 2003).
3. Elizabeth Garrett, “The Purposes of Framework Legislation” (2005) 14 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 717.
4. Eric Schickler, Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovationandthe Development of the U.S. Congress (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001).
5. Elizabeth Garrett, “The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Future Democratic Politics” in G. M. Pomper and M. D. Weiner, eds., The Future of American Democratic Politics: Principles and Practices (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2003) at 141.
6. David C. King, Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997) at 35.
7. Walter J. Oleszek, Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 6th ed. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2004) at 6-7.
8. Barbara Sinclair, Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 2nd ed. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2000).
9. Roger W. Cobb and Charles D. Elder, Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1983) at 96.
10. Allen Schick, The Federal Budget: Politics, Policy, Process, rev. ed. (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2000) at 128.
11. Elizabeth Garrett, “Enhancing the Political Safeguards of Federalism? The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995” (1997) 45 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1113 at 1128-31.
12. Evan H. Caminker, “State Sovereignty and Subordinacy: May Congress Commandeer State Officers to Implement Federal Law?” (1995) 95 Colum. L. Rev. 1001 at 1065.
13. Edward A. Zelinsky, “The Unsolved Problem of the Unfunded Mandate” (1997) 23 Ohio N. U. L. Rev. 741
14. David A. Dana, “The Case for Unfunded Environmental Mandates” (1995) 69 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1 at 18-21.
15. Elizabeth Garrett, “Accountability and Restraint: The Federal Budget Process and the Line Item Veto Act” (1998) 20 Cardozo L. Rev. 871 at 906.
16. Adrian Vermeule, “Veil of Ignorance Rules in Constitutional Law” (2001) 111 Yale L.J. 399 at 428-9.
17. Gary W. Cox and Mathew D. McCubbins, Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
18. Roger H. Davidson, “The Emergence of the Postreform Congress” in R. H. Davidson, ed., The Postreform Congress (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992) 21.
19. Elizabeth Garrett, “The Congressional Budget Process: Strengthening the Party-in-Government” (2000) 100 Colum. L. Rev. 702.
20. Louis Fisher, Constitutional Conflicts Between Congress and the President, 3d ed. (Lawrence: Kansas University Press, 1991) at 140-2.
21. John H. Aldrich, Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995) at 205
22. Gary W. Cox and Mathew D. McCubbins, Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993) at 120-2.
23. Margaret Weir, “Political Parties and Social Policymaking” in M. Weir, ed., Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government (Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution Press, 1998)at 1, 8, 10-11
24. Michael J. Malbin, “Political Parties Underthe Post-McConnell Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act” (2004) 3 Election L.J. 177 at 179.
25. Keith Krehbiel, Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998) at 200.
26. John H. Aldrich, Mark M. Berger, and David W. Rohde, “The Historical Variability in Conditional Party Government, 1877-1994” in David W. Brady and Matthew D. McCubbins, eds., Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002) 17 at 33-4.
27. Lawrence C. Dodd, “Congress and the Quest for Power” in L. C. Dodd and B. I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 1st ed. (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1977) at 269, 272, 281-2.
28. Barbara Sinclair, The Transformation of the U.S. Senate (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989) at 210.
29. Sarah A. Binder, Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003) at 51.
30. James L. Sundquist, “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States” (1988) 103 Pol. Sci. Q. 613.
31. Morris Fiorina, Divided Government, 2nd ed. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1996).
32. David R. Mayhew, Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991).
33. Christopher M. Davis, CRS, Report to Congress, “Fast-Track” or Expedited Procedures: Their Purposes, Elements, and Implications (July 21, 2003)
34. John B. Gilmour, Reconcilable Differences? Congress, the Budget Process, and the Deficit (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990) at 134-7.
35. Sarah A. Binder, Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanshipandthe Development of Congress (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
36. Douglas Dion, Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997).
37. Vasan Kesavan, “Is the Electoral Count Act Unconstitutional?” (2002) 80 N.C. L. Rev. 1653 at 1779-87.
38. Thomas R. Wolanin, “A View from the Trench: Reforming Congressional Procedures” in D. Hale, ed., United States Congress (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1983) 209 at 212.
39. Norman J. Ornstein, “The Legislation Reorganization Act of 1970: First Year’s Record” in N. J. Ornstein, ed., Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform (New York: Praeger, 1975) 187 at 200.
40. Charles H. Stewart, Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process in the House of Representatives 1865-1921 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989) at 204-11.
41. James L. Sundquist, The Decline and Resurgence of Congress (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1981) at 349.
42. Christopher M. Davis, CRS Report to Congress, Expedited Procedures in the House: Variations Enacted Into Law CRS-2 (July 21, 2003).
43. Allen Schick, Congress and Money: Budgeting, Spending, and Taxing (Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 1980).
44. Keith E. Whittington and Daniel P. Carpenter, “Executive Power in American Institutional Development” (2003) 1 Persp. on Pol. 495 at 508.
45. Frederick Schauer, “Legislators as Rule-Followers,” Chapter 23 in this volume (discussing internal enforcement mechanisms for congressional rules and norms).
46. Gregory Wawro, Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000).
47. William N. Eskridge, Jr., and John Ferejohn, “The Article I, Section 7 Game” (1992) 80 Geo. L.J. 523.