Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate

Rhetoric and Public Affairs

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 195-228

  Ceccarelli, Leah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959392288     PISSN: 10948392     EISSN: 15345238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rap.2010.0222     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Marcus Paroske, "Deliberating International Science Policy Controversies: Uncertainty and AIDS in South Africa," Quarterly Journal of Speech 95 (2009): 156-57, 162.
2. Pride Chigwedere, George R. Seage III, Sofia Gruskin, Tun-Hou Lee, and M. Essex, "Estimating the Lost Benefits of Antiretroviral Drug Use in South Africa," Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 49 (2008): 410-15.
3. Sheila Jasanoff, ed., States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order (New York: Routledge, 2004).
4. G. Thomas Goodnight, "The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation," Journal of the American Forensic Association 18 (1982): 219.
5. Nathan Crick and Joseph Gabriel, "The Conduit Between Lifeworld and System: Habermas and the Rhetoric of Public Scientific Controversies," Rhetoric Society Quarterly 40 (2010): 219-20.
6. Marlia Elisabeth Banning, "When Poststructural Theory and Contemporary Politics Collide - The Vexed Case of Global Warming," Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 6 (2009): 286-87, 291, 298;
7. Rachel Avon Whidden, "The Manufacturing of Controversy: Debating Intelligent Design in Public," in Critical Problems in Argumentation: Selected Papers from the Thirteenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, ed. Charles Arthur Willard (Washington, DC: National Communication Association, 2005), 707-8.
8. Sheila Jasanoff, Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), 249.
9. David Michaels, Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), x, 60, 264.
10. David Michaels, "Manufactured Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public's Health and Environment," in Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, ed. Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008), 90-107;
11. David Michaels, "Knowing Uncertainty for What It Is," Nieman Reports 59, no. 4 (2005): 75-77.
12. Robert N. Proctor, "Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural Production of Ignorance (and Its Study)," in Agnotology, 3, 8.
13. Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway, Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2010).
14. William R. Freudenburg, Robert Gramling, and Debra J. Davidson, "Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs): Science and the Politics of Doubt," Sociological Inquiry 78 (2008): 2, 5.
15. Brown and Willliamson, "Smoking and Health Proposal," 1969, Brown and Williamson Collection, Bates number 680561778/1786, p. 4, http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/nvs40f00/pdf (accessed January 2011).
16. Stephen Olbrys Gencarella, "The Myth of Rhetoric: Korax and the Art of Pollution," Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37 (2007): 268-69.
17. Celeste Condit, "How Bad Science Stays that Way: Brain Sex, Demarcation, and the Status of Truth in the Rhetoric of Science," Rhetoric Society Quarterly 26 (1996): 83-109;
18. Carolyn R. Miller, "Novelty and Heresy in the Debate on Nonthermal Effects of Electromagnetic Fields," in Rhetoric and Incommensurability, ed. Randy Allen Harris (West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, 2005), 464-505.
19. Leah Ceccarelli, Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001),
20. Leah Ceccarelli, "Science and Civil Debate: The Case of E. O. Wilson's Sociobiology," in Rhetoric and Incommensurability, 271-93.
21. Leah M. Ceccarelli, "Let Us (Not) Theorize the Spaces of Contention," Argumentation and Advocacy 42 (2005): 32.
22. Zuoyue Wang and Naomi Oreskes, "History of Science and American Science Policy," Isis 99 (2008): 365.
23. Bruno Latour, "Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern," Critical Inquiry 30 (2004): 227, 231.
24. Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979).
25. Social Epistemology 14 (2000): 79-233.
26. Philip C. Wander and Dennis Jaehne, "Prospects for 'a Rhetoric of Science,'" Social Epistemology 14 (2000): 220.
27. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 1 (1998)
28. John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer, eds., Darwinism, Design, and Public Education (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 2003).
29. Discovery Institute, "Peer-Reviewed and Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting the Theory of Intelligent Design," the Discovery Institute, Center for Science and Culture, August 26, 2010, http://www. discovery.org/a/2640 (accessed January 2011).
30. "Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Trial Transcript: Day 15 (October 24, 2005), AM Session, Part 2," The TalkOrigins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy, http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/ day15am2.html (accessed January 2011).
31. Aristotle, Rhetoric, trans. W. Rhys Roberts (Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing, 2004), 3, 4.
32. Michael Leff, "Isocrates, Tradition, and the Rhetorical Version of Civic Education," in Isocrates and Civic Education, ed. Takis Poulakos and David Depew (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2004), 236-37.
33. Bruce A. Kimball, Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education (New York : Teachers College Press, 1986), 238.
34. Muir Russell, Geoffrey Boulton, Peter Clarke, and James Norton, The Independent Climate Change E-mails Review, July 2010, 11-12, http://www.cce-review.org/pdf/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf (accessed January 2011).
35. Barry Brummett, "Rhetorical Theory as Heuristic and Moral: A Pedagogical Justification," Communication Education 33 (1984): 103, 97.
36. Kiran van Rijn, "The Politics of Uncertainty: The AIDS Debate, Thabo Mbeki and the South African Government Response," Social History of Medicine 19 (2006): 521-38;
37. Clark A. Miller, "Climate Science and the Making of a Global Political Order," in States of Knowledge, 46-66;
38. David J. Depew, "Darwinian Controversies: An Historiographical Recounting," Science and Education 19 (2010): 323-66.
39. Thabo Mbeki, "Thabo Mbeki's Letter," April 3, 2000, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/aids/docs/mbeki.html (accessed January 2011).
40. Barton Gellman, "S. African President Escalates AIDS Feud," Washington Post, April 19, 2000, A1.
41. James Darsey, "A Conspiracy of Science," Western Journal of Communication 66 (2002): 488.
42. "The Durban Declaration," Nature 406, no. 6791 (July 6, 2000): 15.
43. "The AIDS Industry and Media Want You to Think There Are Only a Handful of Scientists Who Doubt the HIV-AIDS Theory. Here's The Reality," Rethinking AIDS, http://www.rethinkingaids.com/quotes/rethinkers.htm;
44. "U.S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims," U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files. View&FileStore-id=83947f5d-d84a-4a84-ad5d-6e2d71db52d9;
45. "A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism," the Discovery Institute, http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/.
46. Stuart Jordan and Thomas O'Brien, "The Credibility Project: An Assessment of the 'U.S. Senate Minority Report: More than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man Made Global Warming,'" Center for Inquiry Office of Public Policy, July 2009, http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/ attachments/credibility-brochure.pdf;
47. Whitney Gray, "List of Scientists Rejecting Evolution - Do They Really?" April 14, 2008, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty1Bo6GmPqM.
48. "AIDS Denialists Who Have Died," AIDSTruth.org, http://www.aidstruth.org/denialism/dead-denialists;
49. "The List of Steves," National Center for Science Education, http://ncseweb.org/taking-action/list-steves (all accessed January 2011).
50. Gordon T. Stewart, "The Durban Declaration is not accepted by all," Nature 407, no. 6802 (September 21, 2000): 286.
51. Frank Luntz, "The Environment: A Cleaner, Safer, Healthier America," The Luntz Research Companies-Straight Talk, n.d., http://www.ewg.org/files/LuntzResearch-environment.pdf (accessed January 2011).
52. Luntz Hot Politics, November 13, 2006, Frontline, http://www.pbs.org/ wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/interviews/luntz.html (accessed January 2011).
53. Jennifer Lee, "A Call for Soft er, Greener Language: G.O.P. Adviser Offers Linguistic Tactics for Environmental Edge," New York Times, March 2, 2003, N24.
54. J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noquer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson, eds., Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 25, 61.
55. Andrew C. Revkin, "Warming's Likely Victims," New York Times, February 19, 2001, A4.
56. Naomi Oreskes, "The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change," Science 306, no. 5702 (December 3, 2004), 1686,
57. Matthew C. Nisbet and Teresa Myers, "The Polls - Trends: Twenty Years of Public Opinion About Global Warming," Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (2007): 453.
58. Maxwell T. Boykoff and Jules M. Boykoff, "Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press," Global Environmental Change 14 (2004): 125-36;
59. Maxwell T. Boykoff, "Lost in Translation? United States Television News Coverage of Anthropogenic Climate Change, 1995-2004," Climatic Change 86 (2008): 1-11;
60. Lisa Antilla, "Climate of Scepticism: US Newspaper Coverage of the Science of Climate Change," Global Environmental Change 15 (2005): 338-52.
61. Sharon Dunwoody, "Scientists, Journalists, and the Meaning of Uncertainty," in Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, ed. Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999), 73.
62. Charles Alan Taylor and Celeste Michelle Condit, "Objectivity and Elites: A Creation Science Trial," Critical Studies in Media Communication 5 (1988): 300.
63. Aaron M. McCright, "Dealing with Climate Change Contrarians," in Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, ed. Susanne C. Moser and Lisa Dilling (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 203.
64. John H. Cushman Jr., "Industrial Group Plans to Battle Climate Treaty," New York Times, April 26, 1998, 1, 24.
65. Global Climate Science Team, "Global Climate Science Communications," American Petroleum Institute, April 3, 1998, 2, http://www.edf.org/documents/3860-GlobalClimateSciencePlanMemo.pdf (accessed January 2011).
66. Jim Pedersen, "'Global Warming' Is Alarmism," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 28, 2008, B5.
67. Congressional Record 151, no. 1 (January 4, 2005), S18.
68. S. Fred Singer, "Warming Orthodoxy Ambush," Washington Times, October 4, 1999, A15.
69. Ed Burns, "Please, Limit Opinions to Experts in the Field," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 29, 2008, B7.
70. "The Wedge," Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture, Discovery Institute, n.d., http://ncseweb.org/webfm-send/747 (accessed January 2011).
71. "The 'Wedge Document': 'So What?'," the Discovery Institute, http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349 (accessed January 2011).
72. Carrie Sager, ed., Voices for Evolution (Berkeley, CA: National Center for Science Education, 2008).
73. Kitzmiller v. Dover, Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ, Document 342, filed December 20, 2005, 64, http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller-342.pdf (accessed January 2011).
74. Newsweek poll conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International, March 28-29, 2007,
75. "Science and Nature," PollingReport.com, http://www. pollingreport.com/science.htm (accessed January 2011).
76. Stephen C. Meyer and John Angus Campbell, "Controversy Over Life's Origins: Students Should Learn to Assess Competing Theories," San Francisco Chronicle, December 10, 2004, B9.
77. John A. Campbell and Taz Daughtrey, "Teaching the Contexts: Why Evolution Should Be Taught as an Argument and How It Might Be Done," Religion and Education 33 (2006): 16, 34.
78. Eric Plutzer and Michael Berkman, "The Polls - Trends: Evolution, Creationism, and the Teaching of Human Origins in Schools," Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2008): 551.
79. Robert M. Sapolsky, "Controversy Over Life's Origins: Regardless of How It Works, Evolution Is for Real," San Francisco Chronicle, December 10, 2004, B9.
80. Louisiana Senate Bill No. 733, SLS 08RS-1629, Regular Session, 2008, http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=482728 (accessed January 2011).
81. Leslie Kaufman, "Darwin Foes Add Warming to Target List," New York Times, March 4, 2010, A1, A4.
82. Roger A. Pielke, Jr. and Steve Rayner, "Editor's Introduction," Environmental Science and Policy 7 (2004): 356.
83. Daniel Sarewitz, "How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse," Environmental Science and Policy 7 (2004): 385-403;
84. Lawrence J. Prelli A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989), 261.
85. Lynda Walsh, "Visual Strategies to Integrate Ethos across the 'Is/Ought' Divide in the IPCC's Climate Change 2007: Summary for Policy Makers," Poroi 6, no. 2 (2009): 42.
86. R. A. Brown, "More Letters to the Editor: Global Warming," Seattle Post-Intelligencer Opinion, January 31, 2008, http://www.seattlepi.com/ opinion/349560-webltrs1.html (accessed January 2011).
87. Thomas M. Lessl "Scientific Demarcation and Metascience: The National Academy of Sciences on Greenhouse Warming and Evolution," in Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory, ed. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2008), 77-91.
88. "Out of Control, AIDS, and the Corruption of Medical Science," February 22, 2006, http://www.aidstruth.org/denialism/harpers-farber (accessed January 2011).
89. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), 152.
90. Kieran Healy, "The Revolution Will Not Be Synthesized," in Looking for a Fight: Is There a Republican War on Science?, ed. John Holbo (West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, 2006), 76-77;
91. Eugenie C. Scott and Glenn Branch, "Evolution: What's Wrong with 'Teaching the Controversy,'" Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 (2003): 501.
92. John Angus Campbell, "Intelligent Design, Darwinism, and the Philosophy of Public Education," Rhetoric & Public Affairs 1 (1998): 492.
93. Peter J. Jacques, Riley E. Dunlap, and Mark Freeman, "The Organisation of Denial: Conservative Think Tanks and Environmental Scepticism," Environmental Politics 17 (2008): 349-85;
94. Barbara Forrest, "Still Creationism Aft er All These Years: Understanding and Counteracting Intelligent Design," Integrative and Comparative Biology 48 (2008): 189-201.
95. Steve Schwarze, "Juxtaposition in Environmental Health Rhetoric: Exposing Asbestos Contamination in Libby, Montana," Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6 (2003): 319.
96. John M. Broder, "Scientists Taking Steps to Defend Climate Work," New York Times, March 3, 2010, A1, A11.
97. Sally Jackson, "Predicaments of Politicization in the Debate over Abstinence-Only Sex Education," in Controversy and Confrontation, 219.
98. Nicoli Nattrass, "AIDS Denialism vs. Science," Skeptical Inquirer 31, no. 5 (2007): 31-37.
99. Jean Goodwin and Lee Honeycutt, "When Science Goes Public: From Technical Arguments to Appeals to Authority," Studies in Communication Sciences 9, no. 2 (2009): 27-28.
100. Dale L. Sullivan, "Keeping the Rhetoric Orthodox: Forum Control in Science," Technical Communication Quarterly 9 (2000): 125-46;
101. Thomas M. Lessl, "Heresy, Orthodoxy, and the Politics of Science," Quarterly Journal of Speech 74 (1988): 18-34.