“Let Us (Not) Theorize the Spaces of Contention”

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 30-33

  Ceccarelli, Leah M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61049180652     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821637     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ceccarelli, Leah. Shaping Science with Rhetoric. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2001.
2. Condit, Celeste. “How Bad Science Stays that Way: Brain Sex, Demarcation, and the Status of Truth in the Rhetoric of Science.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 26.4 (1996): 83–109.
3. Czubaroff, Jeanine. “The Public Dimension of Scientific Controversies.” Argumentation 11 (1997): 51–74.
4. Fahnestock, Jeanne. “Arguing in Different Forums: The Bering Crossover Controversy.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 14.1 (1989): 26–42.
5. Goodnight, G. Thomas. “Controversy.” Parson 1–13.
6. Goodnight, G. Thomas. “Science and Technology Controversy: A Rationale for Inquiry.” Argumentation and Advocacy, this issue.
7. Gross, Alan G., “Public Debates as Failed Social Dramas: the Recombinant DNA Controversy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 397–409.
8. Gross, Alan G., “Renewing Aristotelian Theory: The Cold Fusion Controversy as a Test Case.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 81 (1995): 48–62.
9. Harris, Randy Alan, ed. Rhetoric and Incommensurability. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor, in press.
10. Katz, Steven B., and Carolyn R., Miller. “The Low Level Radioactive Waste Siting Controversy in North Carolina: Toward a Rhetorical Model of Risk Communication.” Green Culture in Contemporary America. Ed. Carl G., Herndl and Stuart C., Brown. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1996. 111–40.
11. Lyne, John, and Henry F., Howe. “‘Punctuated Equilibria’: Rhetorical Dynamics of a Scientific Controversy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 72 (1986): 132–47.
12. Parson, Donn W., ed. Argument in Controversy: Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1991.
13. Schiappa, Edward. “‘Spheres of Argument’ as Topoi for the Critical Study of Power/Knowledge.” Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Ed. Bruce E., Gronbeck. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1989. 47–56.
14. Taylor, Charles Alan., “On the Public Closure of Technical Controversy.” Parson 263–69.
15. Taylor, Charles Alan., “Science as Cultural Practice: A Rhetorical Perspective.” Technical Communication Quarterly 3 (1994): 67–81.
16. Willard, Charles Arthur., “The Creation of Publics: Notes on Goodnight's Historical Relativity.” Argumentation and Advocacy 26 (1989): 45–59.