Evaluation of the hybrid-L24® electrode using microcomputed tomography

Laryngoscope

Volumn 121, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1508-1516

  Driscoll, Colin L W ^a,b   Carlson, Matthew L ^a   Fama, Anthony F ^a   Lane, John I ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant(s); CT microscopy; electroacoustic stimulation; Hybrid L24 ; microcomputed tomography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BASILAR MEMBRANE; COCHLEA FENESTRA; COCHLEA INJURY; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEOSTOMY; EAR SURGERY; ELECTRODE; HUMAN; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOFT TISSUE; SPIRAL LAMINA; SPIRAL LIGAMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEMPORAL BONE;

CADAVER; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROUND WINDOW, EAR; TEMPORAL BONE; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79959378213     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21837     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Roland JT Jr,. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 1325-1339. (Pubitemid 41105835)
2. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Stidham K, et al. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation. Acta Oto-laryngologica 2005; 125: 870-876. (Pubitemid 41224108)
3. Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, et al. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27: 1083-1088. (Pubitemid 44863730)
4. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, et al. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 796-802. (Pubitemid 40604682)
5. Lenarz T, Stover T, Buechner A, et al. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover. Audiol Neuro-otology 2009; 14 (Suppl 1): 22-31.
6. von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL 1999; 61: 334-340. (Pubitemid 29515564)
7. Gantz BJ, Turner CW,. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1726-1730. (Pubitemid 37210974)
8. Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, et al. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol Neuro-otology 2009; 14 (Suppl 1): 32-38.
9. Roland PS, Wright CG,. Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Adv Oto-rhino-laryngol 2006; 64: 11-30. (Pubitemid 44338653)
10. Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, et al. In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otology Rhinol Laryngol 2007; 197: 2-24.
11. Wright CG, Roland PS, Kuzma J,. Advanced bionics thin lateral and Helix II electrodes: a temporal bone study. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 2041-2405.
12. Huang TC, Reitzen SD, Marrinan MS, et al. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27: 159-166.
13. Roland JT Jr, Zeitler DM, Jethanamest D, et al. Evaluation of the short hybrid electrode in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 482-488.
14. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, et al. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neuro-otol 2006; 11 (Suppl 1): 42-48. (Pubitemid 44629842)
15. Postnov A, Zarowski A, De Clerck N, et al. High resolution micro-CT scanning as an innovative tool for evaluation of the surgical positioning of cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Oto-laryngol 2006; 126: 467-474.
16. Lane JI, Driscoll CL, Witte RJ, et al. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: a cadaveric validation study comparing 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with microcomputed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28: 191-194. (Pubitemid 46175119)
17. Schuknecht H,. Pathology of the Ear. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 1976.
18. Lenarz T, Stover T, Buechner A, et al. Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode. Audiol Neuro-otol 2006; 11 (Suppl 1): 34-41. (Pubitemid 44629841)
19. Rebscher SJ, Hetherington A, Bonham B, et al. Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion. J Rehabil Rese Dev 2008; 45: 731-747.
20. Briggs R, Tykocinski M, Saunders E, et al. Surgical implications of perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode design: avoiding intracochlear damage and scala vestibuli insertion. Cochlear Implants Int 2001; 2: 135-149.
21. Leake PA, Hradek GT, Snyder RL,. Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness. J Comp Neurol 1999; 412: 543-562. (Pubitemid 29409671)
22. Webb RL, Clark GM, Shepherd RK, et al. The biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multiple-electrode intracochlear implant. Am J Otol 1988; 9: 8-13.
23. Adunka O, Unkelbach MH, Mack M, et al. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Oto-laryngol 2004; 124: 807-812. (Pubitemid 39280206)
24. Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B,. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 1397-1402. (Pubitemid 47356842)
25. Paprocki A, Biskup B, Kozlowska K, et al. The topographical anatomy of the round window and related structures for the purpose of cochlear implant surgery. Folia Morphol 2004; 63: 309-312. (Pubitemid 39263792)