Effects of Age, Speed of Processing, and Working Memory on Comprehension of Sentences With Relative Clauses

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 439-450

  Caplan, David ^a   DeDe, Gayle ^b   Waters, Gloria ^c   Michaud, Jennifer ^a   Tripodis, Yorghos ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Speed of processing; Syntactic comprehension; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; GRAMMAR; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; READING; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959299914     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: 19391498     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021837     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Altman G.T.M., Kamide Y. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:502-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004.
2. Blozis S., Traxler M. Analyzing individual differences in sentence processing performance using multilevel models. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:31-38.
3. Caplan D., Waters G.S. Verbal working memory capacity and language comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Science 1999, 22:114-126. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99441780.
4. Caplan D., Waters G.S. Working memory and connectionist models of parsing: A response to MacDonald and Christiansen. Psychological Review 2002, 109:66-74. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.66.
5. DeDe G., Caplan D., Kemtes K., Waters G. The relationship between age, verbal working memory, and language comprehension. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:601-616. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.601.
6. Earles J.L., Connor L.T., Frieske D., Park D.C., Smith A.D., Zwahr M. Age differences in inhibition: Possible causes and consequences. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 1997, 4:45-57. doi: 10.1080/13825589708256635.
7. Farmer T.A., Anderson S.E., Spivey M.J. Gradiency and visual context in syntactic garden-paths. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:570-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.003.
8. Ferreira F., Anes M. Why study spoken language?. Handbook of psycholinguistics 1994, 33-56. Academic Press, San Diego. M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.).
9. Ferreira F., Anes M.D., Horine M.D. Exploring the use of prosody during language comprehension using the auditory moving window technique. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1996, 25:273-290. doi: 10.1007/BF01708574.
10. Ferreira F., Clifton C. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 1986, 25:348-368. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9.
11. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975, 12:189-198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
12. Garnsey S.M., Tanenhaus M.K., Chapman R.M. Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1989, 18:51-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01069046.
13. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 1998, 68:1-76.
14. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., Johnson M., Lee Y. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2006, 32:1304-1321. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1304.
15. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., Levine W.H. Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science 2002, 13:425-430. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00475.
16. Grodner D., Gibson E., Tunstall S. Syntactic complexity in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:267-295. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2808.
17. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 1992, 99:122-149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
18. Kemper S., Kemtes K. Limitations on syntactic processing. Constraints on language: Aging, grammar, and memory 1999, 79-105. Kluwer Academic Publications, Boston. S. Kemper, R. Kliegl (Eds.).
19. King J.W., Just M.A. Individual difference in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:580-602. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90027-H.
20. Lewis R.L., Vasishth S., Van Dyke J.A. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007.
21. MacDonald M.C., Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:56-98. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-K.
22. MacDonald M.E., Christiansen M.H. Reassessing working memory: A reply to Just and Carpenter and Waters and Caplan. Psychological Review 2002, 109:35-54. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35.
23. McKoon G., Ratcliff R. Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1239-1243. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1239.
24. McKoon G., Ratcliff R., Ward G. Testing theories of language processing: An empirical investigation of the on-line lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1219-1228. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1219.
25. Nicol J., Fodor J.D., Swinney D. Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1229-1238. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1229.
26. Reali F., Christiansen M.H. Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014.
27. Reichle E.D., Warren T., McConnell K. Using E-Z Reader to model effects of higher level language processing on eye-movements in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:1-20. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.1.
28. Salthouse T.A. Speed and knowledge as determinates of adult age differences in verbal tasks. Journal of Gerontology 1993, 48:29-36.
29. Salthouse T.A. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review 1996, 3:403-428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403.
30. Salthouse T.A., Babcock R.L. Decomposing adults age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology 1991, 27:763-776. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763.
31. SAS/IML63720 9.1 User's guide 2004, SAS Institute Inc., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
32. Spivey M.J., Grant E.R. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 45:447-481. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00503-0.
33. Stine-Morrow E.A.L., Ryan S., Leonard J.S. Age differences in on-line syntactic processing. Experimental Aging Research 2000, 26:315-322. doi: 10.1080/036107300750015714.
34. Tanenhaus M., Maghuson J.S., Dahan D., Chambers C. Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal Psycholinguistic Research 2000, 29:557-580. doi: 10.1023/A:1026464108329.
35. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:1632-1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863.
36. Traxler M., Morris R., Seely R. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal Memory Language 2002, 47:69-90. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2836.
37. Traxler M.J., Williams R.S., Blozis S.A., Morris R.K. Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 53:204-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.010.
38. Waters G., Caplan D. The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: A reply to Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review 1996, 103:761-772. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.761.
39. Waters G.S., Caplan D. The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1996, 49A:51-74. doi: 10.1080/027249896392801.
40. Waters G.S., Caplan D. Verbal working memory capacity and on-line sentence processing efficiency in the elderly. Constraints on language: Aging, grammar and memory 1999, 107-136. Kluwer Academic Publications, Boston. S. Kemper, R. Kliegel (Eds.).
41. Waters G.S., Caplan D. Age, working memory and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging 2001, 16:128-144. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.128.
42. Waters G.S., Caplan D. The reliability and stability of operation span measures. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 2003, 35:550-564.
43. Waters G.S., Caplan D. The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension. Memory 2005, 13:403-413. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000459.
44. Wells J., Christiansen M.H., Race D.S., Acheson D., MacDonald M.C. Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58:250-271. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002.
45. Zurif E., Swinney D., Prather P., Wingfield A., Brownell H. The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the elderly. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1995, 24:165-182. doi: 10.1007/BF02145354.