Atraumatic round window deep insertion of cochlear electrodes

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 131, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 740-749

  Skarzynski, Henryk ^a   Lorens, Artur ^a   Zgoda, Małgorzata ^a   Piotrowska, Anna ^a   Skarzynski, Piotr Henryk ^a   Szkielkowska, Agata ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

Author keywords

cochlear implants; EIT; electric acoustic stimulation; electrode insertion trauma; hearing preservation; Partial deafness treatment; PDT

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROUND WINDOW, EAR; TEMPORAL BONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959279102     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2011.557780     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Staecker H, Gabaizadeh R, Federoff H, Van De Water TR. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene therapy prevents spiral ganglion degeneration after hair cell loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;119:7-13. (Pubitemid 28350658)
2. Khan AM, Handzel O, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB Jr. Effect of cochlear implantation on residual spiral ganglion cell count as determined by comparison with the contralateral nonimplanted inner ear in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114:381-5. (Pubitemid 40676654)
3. Eshraghi AA, Polak M, He J, Telischi FF, Balkany TJ, Van De Water TR. Pattern of hearing loss in a rat model of cochlear implantation trauma. Otol Neurotol 2005;26: 442-7; discussion 447.
4. Lenarz T, Stover T, Buechner A, Paasche G, Briggs R, Risi F, et al. Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11 (Suppl):34-41. (Pubitemid 44629841)
5. Adunka O, Kiefer J. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 135:374-82. (Pubitemid 44292963)
6. Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, et al. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27:1083-8. (Pubitemid 44863730)
7. BaumgartnerWD, JappelA,Morera C, GstöttnerW,Müller J, Kiefer J, et al.Outcomes in adultsimplantedwiththeFLEXsoft electrode. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:579-86.
8. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, D'Haese P, Walkowiak A, Piotrowska A, Sliwa L, et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002;64:247-53.
9. Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, Sturzebecher E, Baumgartner W, Schmidt M, et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol 2005;10:134-44. (Pubitemid 40663391)
10. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I. Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach. Acta OtoLaryngol 2007;127:41-8.
11. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Podskarbi-Fayette R. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs. Audiol Neurootol 2009;14(Suppl 1): 39-45.
12. Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, O'Leary S. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:163-72. (Pubitemid 38478866)
13. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, Gates GA, et al. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002;3:332-50. (Pubitemid 35204666)
14. Hochmair I, Arnold W, Nopp P, Jolly C, Müller J, Roland P. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:612-17. (Pubitemid 36831378)
15. Coco A, Epp SB, Fallon JB, Xu J, Millard RE, Shepherd RK. Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons? Hear Res 2007;225:60-70.
16. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A. A new method of partial deafness treatment. Med Sci Monit 2003;9:20-4.
17. Lorens A, Polak M, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study. Laryngoscope 2008;118:288-94. (Pubitemid 351640204)
18. Pruszewicz A, Demenko G, Richter L, Wika T. New articulation lists for speech audiometry. Part II. Otolaryngol Pol 1994;48:56-62.
19. Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Reimer B, Knecht R, Gall V, Diller G, et al. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss - implications for patient selection. Audiology 1998;37:382-95. (Pubitemid 29017207)
20. Prentiss S, Sykes K, Staecker H. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol 2010;21:197-203.
21. Fraysse B, Macías AR, Sterkers O, Burdo S, Ramsden R, Deguine O, et al. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:624-33. (Pubitemid 44180473)
22. Luetje CM, Thedinger BS, Buckler LR, Dawson KL, Lisbona KL. Hybrid cochlear implantation: clinical results and critical review in 13 cases. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28:473-8. (Pubitemid 47264550)