A new method of partial deafness treatment

Medical Science Monitor

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages

  Skarzyński, Henryk ^a   Lorens, Artur ^a,b   Piotrowska, Anna ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

^b NONE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Electroacoustic stimulation; Hearing aids; Severe hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; HYPOACUSIS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038221071     PISSN: 12341010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Skarżyński H, Rogowski M, Fabijanska A, Bartnik G: The epidemiology of hearing disorders in Poland. 4th European Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery editors: Klaus Jahnke, Markus Fischer, Monduzzi Editore, Italy, 2000; 159-162
2. von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillien J et al: Electric-Acoustic-Stimulation (EAS) of the Auditory System. New Technology against severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 1999; 61(6): 334-40
3. Lenarz T: Cochlear implants: selection criteria and shifting borders. Acta oto-rhino - laryngologica belg, 1998; 52: 183-99
4. Rizer FM: Post operative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1998; 98: 203-6
5. Brimacombe JA, Arndt PE, Staller SJ et al: Multichannel cochlear implantation in adults with severe to profound sensori-neural hearing loss In: Hochmair Desoyer I, Hochmair E, editors. Cochlear Implants Wien: Manz, 1994; 387-92
6. Lorens A, Geremek A, Walkowiak A, Skarżyński H: Residual acoustic hearing in the ear befor and after cochlear implantation; in Jahnke K, Fischer M, editors. 4th European Congress of OtoRhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi, 2000; 1: 135-138
7. Skarżyński H, Lorens A, D'Haese P et al: Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: An initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2002; 64(4): 247-53
8. Harrell RW: Puretone Evaluation. In Katz J, editor. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002; 71-87
9. Goodman A: Reference zero levels for pure-tone audiometer. ASHA, 1965; 75(7): 262-263
10. Clark JG: Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA, 1981; 23: 493-500
11. Bogess W, Baker J, Balkany T: Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 1989; 99: 1002-5
12. Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Schaefer AB: Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am, 1989; 85(1): 355-64
13. Hogan CA, Turner CW: High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 1998; 104(1): 432-41
14. Turner CW, Cummings KJ: Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol, 1999; 8(1): 47-56
15. Smoorenburg GF: On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol, 1990; 469(Suppl): 38-46
16. McDermott HJ, Dean MR: Speech perception with steeply sloping hearing loss: effects of frequency transposition. Br J Audiol, 2000; 34(6): 353-61
17. Kiefer J, Gall V, Desloovre C et al. A follow up study of long term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1996; 253: 158-66