Efficiency of post-dilution hemodiafiltration with a high-flux α-polysulfone dialyzer

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 397-404

  Pedrini, Luciano A ^a   Gmerek, Andreas ^b   Wagner, Jurgen ^b  

^a BOLOGNINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b B Braun Melsungen AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beta2 microglobulin; Hemodiafiltration; High flux dialyzer; Mid dilution hemodiafiltration; Trans membrane pressure; polysulfone

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING PROCESS; ULTRAFILTRATION; UREA;

BETA-2-MICROGLOBULIN; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HIGH FLUX; HIGH-FLUX DIALYZER; MID-DILUTION HEMODIAFILTRATION; POLYSULPHONE; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; Α-POLYSULPHONE;

DILUTION;

ALBUMIN; POLYSULFONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODILUTION; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MALE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 79959251837     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/IJAO.2011.8330     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Canaud B, Bragg-Gresham JL, Marshall MR, et al. Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2006;69(11):2087-2093. Medline. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000447
2. Vilar E, Fry AC, Wellsted D, Tattersall JE, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. Long-Term Outcomes in Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Comparative Analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(12):1944-1953. doi:10.2215/CJN.05560809
3. Beerenhout CH, Luik AJ, Jeuken-Mertens SG, et al. Predilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(6):1155-1163. Medline. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh775
4. Meert N, Eloot S, Waterloos MA, et al. Effective removal of protein-bound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(2):562-570. Medline. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn522
5. Vaslaki L, Major L, Berta K, et al. On-line haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis: stable haematocrit with less erythropoietin and improvement of other relevant bloodparameters. Blood Purif. 2006;24(2):163-173. Medline. doi:10.1159/000090117
6. Ward RA, Schmidt B, Hullin J, Hillebrand GF, Samtleben W. A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective clinical study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(12):2344-2350.
7. Henderson LW. Biophysics of ultrafiltration and hemofiltration. In: Maher JF, ed. Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1989:300-326.
8. Pedrini LA, De Cristofaro V. On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: effect on middlemolecule removal. Kidney Int. 2003;64(4):1505-1513. Medline. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00240.x
9. Krieter DH, Falkenhain S, Chalabi L, Collins G, Lemke HD, Canaud B. Clinical cross-over comparison of mid-dilution hemodiafiltration using a novel dialyzer concept and postdilution hemodiafiltration. Kidney Int. 2005;67(1):349-356. Medline. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00088.x
10. Pedrini LA, Cozzi G, Faranna P, et al. Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss. Kidney Int. 2006;69(3):573-579. Medline. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000110
11. Santoro A, Ferramosca E, Mancini E, et al. Reverse middilution: new way to remove small and middle molecules as well as phosphate with high intrafilter convective clearance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(7):2000-2005. Medline. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm101
12. Pedrini LA, Feliciani A, Zerbi S, Cozzi G, Ruggiero P. Optimization of mid-dilution haemodiafiltration: technique and performance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(9):2816-2824. Medline. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp207
13. Gastaldon F, Brendolan A, Crepaldi C, et al. Effects of novel manufacturing technology on blood and dialysate flow distribution in a new low flux "alpha Polysulfone" hemodialyzer. Int J Artif Organs. 2003;26(2):105-112.
14. Mann H, Al-Bashir A, Melzer H, Stiller S. Diacap alphapolysulfone HI PS: a new dialysis membrane with optimum beta2-microglobulin elimination. Int J Artif Organs. 2003;26(6):461-466.
15. Depner TA, Keshaviah PR, Ebben JP, et al. Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7(3):464-471.
16. Daugirdas JT. Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 1995;2(4):295-304.
17. Sargent JA, Gotch FA. Principles and Biophysics of Dialysis. In: Jacobs C, Kjellstrand CM, Koch KM, Winchester JF, eds. Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. 4th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1996: 34-102.
18. Krieter DH, Collins G, Summerton J, Spence E, Moragues HL, Canaud B. Mid-dilution on-line haemodiafiltration in a standard dialyser configuration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(1):155-160. Medline. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh520
19. Maduell F, Arias M, Vera M, et al. Mid-Dilution Hemodiafiltration: A Comparison with Pre- and Postdilution Modes Using the Same Polyphenylene Membrane. Blood Purif. 2009;28(3):268-274. Medline. doi:10.1159/000232935.