Optimization of mid-dilution haemodiafiltration: Technique and performance

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 2816-2824

  Pedrini, Luciano A ^a   Feliciani, Annalisa ^a   Zerbi, Simona ^a   Cozzi, Giorgio ^a   Ruggiero, Pio ^a  

^a BOLOGNINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beta2 microglobulin; Convective treatments; Haemodiafiltration; Mid dilution HDF; Transmembrane pressure

Indexed keywords

BETA 2 MICROGLOBULIN; PHOSPHATE; UREA;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIALYSATE; FEMALE; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CLEARANCE; MALE; MID DILUTION HAEMODIAFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AGED; BETA 2-MICROGLOBULIN; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHATES; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOXINS, BIOLOGICAL; UREA;

EID: 69249095286     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp207     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bammens B, Evenepoel P, Verbeke K et al. Removal of the proteinbound solute p-cresol by convective transport: a randomized crossover study. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 44: 278-285
2. Beerenhout CH, Luik AJ, Jeuken-Mertens SG et al. Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis: a randomized prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 1155-1163
3. Locatelli F, Marcelli D, Conte F et al. Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatments. The Registro Lombardo Dialisi e Trapianto. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 286-293
4. Maduell F, Navarro V, Cruz MC et al. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low-and high-flux hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 582-589
5. Vaslaki L, Major L, Berta K et al. On-line haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis: stable haematocrit with less erythropoietin and improvement of other relevant blood parameters. Blood Purif 2006; 24: 163-173
6. Ward RA, Schmidt B, Hullin J et al. A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective clinical study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 2344-2350
7. Canaud B, Bragg-Gresham JL, Marshall MR et al. Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 2006; 69: 2087-2093
8. Krieter DH, Falkenhain S, Chalabi L et al. Clinical cross-over comparison of mid-dilution hemodiafiltration using a novel dialyzer concept and post-dilution hemodiafiltration. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 349-356
9. Krieter DH, Collins G, Summerton J et al. Mid-dilution on-line haemodiafiltration in a standard dialyzer configuration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 155-160
10. Feliciani A, Riva MA, Zerbi S et al. New strategies in haemodialfiltration (HDF): prospective comparative analysis between on-line mixed HDF and mid-dilution HDF. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 1672-1679
11. Santoro A, Ferramosca E,Mancini E et al. Reverse mid-dilution: new way to remove small and middle molecules as well as phosphate with high intrafilter convective clearance. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 2000-2005
12. Krieter DH, Canaud B. New strategies in haemodialfiltration (HDF)-prospective comparative analysis between onlinemixedHDF andmid-dilution HDF. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 1465-1466
13. The EBPG Expert Group on Haemodialysis. European Best Practice Guidelines for Haemodialysis: Part 1. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17 (Suppl 7): 7-109
14. Depner TA, Keshaviah PR, Ebben JP et al. Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 464-471
15. Daugirdas JT. Simplified equations formonitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1995; 2: 295-304
16. Sargent JA, Gotch FA. Principles and biophysics of dialysis. In: Jacobs C, Kjellstrand CM, Koch KM, Winchester JF (eds). Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996, 34-102
17. Pedrini LA, De Cristofaro V. On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: effect on middle-molecule removal. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1505-1513
18. David S, Cambi V. Hemofiltration: predilution versus postdilution. Contrib Nephrol 1992; 96: 77-85
19. Pedrini LA, Cozzi G, Faranna P et al. Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss. Kidney Int 2006; 69: 573-579