Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss

Kidney International

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 573-579

  Pedrini, L A ^a   Cozzi, G ^a   Faranna, P ^a   Mercieri, A ^a   Ruggiero, P ^a   Zerbi, S ^a   Feliciani, A ^a   Riva, A ^a  

^a BOLOGNINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

2 microglobulin transmembrane pressure; Convection; Feedback; Hemodiafiltration; Middle molecule; Profiling

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; BETA 2 MICROGLOBULIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIALYSIS MEMBRANE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HUMAN; MALE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPLETION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; ALBUMINS; ALBUMINURIA; BETA 2-MICROGLOBULIN; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HEMODIAFILTRATION; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MALE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MIDDLE AGED; PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE;

EID: 31544467314     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000110     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bouman CS, Van Olden RW, Stoutenbeek CP. Cytokine filtration and adsorption during pre- and postdilution hemofiltration in four different membranes. Blood Purif 1998; 16: 261-268.
2. Goldfarb S, Golper TA. Proinflammatory cytokines and hemofiltration membranes. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 5: 228-232.
3. Kaiser JP, Oppermann M, Gotze O et al. Significant reduction of factor D and immunosuppressive complement fragment Ba by hemofiltration. Blood Purif 1995; 13: 314-321.
4. Lin CL, Yang CW, Chiang CC et al. Long-term on-line hemodiafiltration reduces predialysis beta-2-microglobulin levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2001; 19: 301-307.
5. Lornoy W, Becaus I, Billiouw JM et al. On-line haemodiafiltration. Remarkable removal of beta2-microglobulin. Long-term clinical observations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15(Suppl 1): 49-54.
6. Maduell F, Navarro V, Cruz MC et al. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 582-589.
7. Pedrini LA, De Cristofaro V. On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: effect on middle-molecule removal. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1505-1513.
8. Ward RA, Schmidt B, Hullin J et al. A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective clinical study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 2344-2350.
9. Wizemann V, Lotz C, Techert F, Uthoff S. On-line haemodiafiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis. A prospective randomized study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15(Suppl 1): 43-48.
10. Bonforte G, Grillo P, Zerbi S, Surian M. Improvement of anemia in hemodialysis patients treated by hemodiafiltration with high-volume on-line-prepared substitution fluid. Blood Purif 2002; 20: 357-363.
11. Lin CL, Huang CC, Yu CC et al. Improved iron utilization and reduced erythropoietin resistance by on-line hemodiafiltration. Blood Purif 2002; 20: 349-356.
12. Minutolo R, Bellizzi V, Cioffi M et al. Postdialytic rebound of serum phosphorus: pathogenetic and clinical insights. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1046-1054.
13. Zehnder C, Gutzwiller JP, Renggli K. Hemodiafiltration - a new treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol 1999; 52: 152-159.
14. Ahrenholz P, Winkler RE, Ramlow W, Tiess M et al. On-line hemodiafiltration with pre- and postdilution: a comparison of efficacy. Int J Artif Organs 1997; 20: 81-90.
15. Pedrini LA, De Cristofaro V, Pagliari B, Sama F. Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 2155-2165.
16. Wizemann V, Kulz M, Techert F, Nederlof B. Efficacy of haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16(Suppl 4): 27-30.
17. Combarnous F, Tetta C, Cellier CC et al. Albumin loss in on-line hemodiafiltration. Int J Artif Organs 2002; 25: 203-209.
18. Ikizler TA, Flakoll PJ, Parker RA, Hakim RM. Amino acid and albumin losses during hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1994; 46: 830-837.
19. Krieter DH, Canaud B. High permeability of dialysis membranes: what is the limit of albumin loss? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 651-654.
20. Kim ST, Yamamoto C, Taoka M, Takasugi M. Programmed filtration, a new method for removing large molecules and regulating albumin leakage during hemodiafiltration treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: S220-S223.
21. Gotch FA. Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis. In: Nissenson AR, Gentile DE, Fine RN, Norwalk (eds). Clinical Dialysis. Appleton & Lange: Stanford, CA, 1996 pp 118-146.
22. Rockel A, Hertel J, Fiegel P et al. Permeability and secondary membrane formation of a high flux polysulfone hemofilter. Kidney Int 1986; 30: 429-432.
23. Vaussenat F, Canaud B, Bosc JY et al. Intradialytic glucose infusion increases polysulphone membrane permeability and post-dilutional haemodiafiltration performances. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 511-516.
24. Sargent JA, Gotch FA. Principles and biophysics of dialysis. In: Jacobs C, Kjellstrand CM, Koch KM, Winchester JF (eds). Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. 4th edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1996 pp 34-102.
25. Bosch JP, Geronemus R, Glabman S et al. High flux hemofiltration. Artif Organs 1978; 2: 339-342.
26. Pedrini LA, De Cristofaro V, Pagliari B et al. Optimization of convection on hemodiafiltration by transmembrane pressure monitoring and biofeedback. Contrib Nephrol 2002; 137: 254-259.
27. Depner TA, Keshaviah PR, Ebben JP et al. Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 464-471.