On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: Effect on middle-molecule removal

Kidney International

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1505-1513

  Pedrini, Luciano A ^a,b   De Cristofaro, Vincenzo ^a,b  

^a BOLOGNINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Hospital of Sondrio   (Italy)

Author keywords

Feedback; Hemodiafiltration; Middle molecule; Transmembrane pressure; Ultrafiltration; 2 microglobulin

Indexed keywords

BETA 2 MICROGLOBULIN; CREATININE; PHOSPHATE; UREA;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DIALYSIS MEMBRANE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HEMOFILTRATION; HUMAN; INSULIN INFUSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PHOSPHATE BLOOD LEVEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRAFILTRATION; UREA BLOOD LEVEL; WATER FLOW;

EID: 0141674847     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00240.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BLOEMBERGEN WE, HAKIM RM, STANNARD DC, et al: Relationship of dialysis membrane and cause-specific mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 33:1-10, 1999
2. KODA Y, NISHI S, MIYAZAKI S, et al: Switch from conventional to high-flux membrane reduces the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome and mortality of hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 52:1096-1101, 1997
3. LEYPOLDT JK, CHEUNG AK, CARROLL CE, et al: Effect of dialysis membranes and middle molecule removal on chronic hemodialysis patient survival. Am J Kidney Dis 33:349-355, 1999
4. PORT FK, WOLFE RA, HULBERT-SHEARON TE, et al: Mortality risk by hemodialyzer reuse practice and dialyzer membrane characteristics: Results from the USRDS Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study. Am J Kidney Dis 37:276-286, 2001
5. WOODS HF, NANDAKUMAR M: Improved outcome for haemodialysis patients treated with high-flux membranes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15(Suppl 1):36-42, 2000
6. LOCATELLI F, MARCELLI D, CONTE F, et al: Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatments. Registro Lombardo Dialisi e Trapianto. Kidney Int 55:286-293, 1999
7. EKNOYAN G, BECK GJ, CHEUNG AK, et al: Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 347:2010-2019, 2002
8. LOCATELLI F, MASTRANGELO F, REDAELLI B, et al: Effects of different membranes and dialysis technologies on patient treatment tolerance and nutritional parameters. The Italian Cooperative Dial Study Group. Kidney Int 50:1293-1302, 1996
9. WARD RA, SCHMIDT B, HULLIN J, et al: A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: A prospective clinical study. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:2344-2350, 2000
10. AHRENHOLZ P, WINKLER RE, RAMLOW W, et al: On-line hemodiafiltration with pre- and postdilution: A comparison of efficacy. Int J Artif Organs 20:81-90, 1997
11. FLOEGE J, GRANOLLERAS C, DESCHODT G, et al: High-flux synthetic versus cellulosic membranes for beta 2-microglobulin removal during hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 4:653-657, 1989
12. KERR PB, ARGILES A, FLAVIER JL, et al: Comparison of hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration: A long-term longitudinal study. Kidney Int 41:1035-1040, 1992
13. LORNOY W, BECAUS I, BILLIOUW JM, et al: Remarkable removal of beta-2-microglobulin by on-line hemodiafiltration. Am J Nephrol 18:105-108, 1998
14. PEDRINI LA, DE CRISTOFARO V, PAGLIARI B, SAMA F: Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes. Kidney Int 58:2155-2165, 2000
15. WIZEMANN V, LOTZ C, TECHERT F, UTHOFF S: On-line haemodiafiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis. A prospective randomized study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15(Suppl 1):43-48, 2000
16. SCHRODER M, RIEDEL E, BECK W, et al: Increased reduction of dimethylarginines and lowered interdialytic blood pressure by the use of biocompatible membranes. Kidney Int 59:19-24, 2001
17. KAISER JP, OPPERMANN M, GOTZE O, et al: Significant reduction of factor D and immunosuppressive complement fragment Ba by hemofiltration. Blood Purif 13:314-321, 1995
18. JORSTAD S, SMEBY LC, BALSTAD T, WIDEROE TE: Generation and removal of anaphylatoxins during hemofiltration with five different membranes. Blood Purif 6:325-335, 1988
19. BOUMAN CS, VAN OLDEN RW, STOUTENBEEK CP: Cytokine filtration and adsorption during pre- and postdilution hemofiltration in four different membranes. Blood Purif 16:261-268, 1998
20. GOLDFARB S, GOLPER TA: Proinflammatory cytokines and hemofiltration membranes. J Am Soc Nephrol 5:228-232, 1994
21. THE EBPG EXPERT GROUP ON HAEMODIALYSIS: European Best Practice Guidelines For Haemodialysis. Section II. Haemodialysis Adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17(Suppl 7):16-31, 2002
22. WIZEMANN V, KULZ M, TECHERT F, NEDERLOF B: Efficacy of haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16(Suppl 4):27-30, 2001
23. SARGENT JA, GOTCH FA: Principles and biophysics of dialysis, chapter 4, in Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, 3 ed., edited by MAHER J, Boston, Kluwer Academic, 1989, pp 87-143
24. BOSCH JP, GERONEMUS R, GLABMAN S, et al: High flux hemofiltration. Artif Organs 2:339-342, 1978
25. DEPNER TA, KESHAVIAH PR, EBBEN JP, et al: Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:464-471, 1996
26. GOTCH FA: Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis, in Clinical Dialysis, edited by NISSENSON AR, FINE RN, GENTILE DE, Norwalk, Appleton & Lange, 1996, pp 118-146
27. DAUGIRDAS JT: Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther 2:295-304, 1995
28. DAVID S, CAMBI V: Hemofiltration: Predilution versus postdilution. Contrib Nephrol 96:77-85, 1992
29. VILKER VL, COLTON CK, SMITH KA, GREEN DL: The osmotic pressure of concentrated protein and lipoprotein solutions and its significance to ultrafiltration. J Memb Sci 20:63-77, 1984
30. VILKER VL, COLTON CK, SMITH KA: Concentration polarization in protein ultrafiltration. Am Inst Chem Enginr 47:632-645, 1981
31. VAUSSENAT F, CANAUD B, BOSC JY, et al: Intradialytic glucose infusion increases polysulphone membrane permeability and post-dilutional haemodiafiltration performances. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:511-516, 2000
32. HENDERSON LW: Biophysics of ultrafiltration and hemofiltration, in Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, edited by MAHER JF, Boston, Kluwer Academic, 1989, pp 300-326
33. PEDRINI LA, DE CRISTOFARO V, PAGLIARI B: Effects of the infusion mode on bicarbonate balance in on-line hemodiafiltration. Int J Artif Organs 25:100-106, 2002
34. PEDRINI LA, DE CRISTOFARO V, PAGLIARI B, RUGGIERO P: Dialysate/infusate composition and infusion mode in on-line hemodiafiltration. Contrib Nephrol 137:344-349, 2002