Reproductive compensation

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1189-1200

  Gowaty, Patricia Adair ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

Author keywords

Constraints; Differential allocation hypothesis; Dispersal limitation; Life history trade offs; Mate preferences; Offspring viability selection; Phenotypic plasticity; Sexual coercion

Indexed keywords

DISPERSAL; LIFE HISTORY; MATE CHOICE; PARENTAL CARE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE COST; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; TRADE-OFF; VIABILITY;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; MALE; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 49549108169     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01559.x     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Anderson, W.W., Kim, Y.-K. Gowaty, P.A. 2007. Experimental constraints on female and male mate preferences in Drosophila pseudoobscura decrease offspring viability and reproductive success of breeding pairs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 : 4484 4488.
2. Bize, P., Roulin, A., Tella, J.L., Bersier, L.F. Richner, H. 2004. Additive effects of ectoparasites over reproductive attempts in the long-lived alpine swift. J. Anim. Ecol. 73 : 1080 1088.
3. Bluhm, C.K. Gowaty, P.A. 2004a. Reproductive compensation for offspring viability deficits by female mallards, Anas platyrhynchos. Anim. Behav. 68 : 985 992.
4. Bluhm, C.K. Gowaty, P.A. 2004b. Social constraints on female mate preferences in mallards Anas platyrhynchos decrease offspring viability and mother's productivity. Anim. Behav. 68 : 977 983.
5. Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76 : 305 339.
6. Brown, J.L. 1997. A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 8 : 60 65.
7. Brownmiller, S. 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. Simon and Shuster, New York.
8. Burley, N. 1988. The differential allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 132 : 611 628.
9. Byers, J.A. Waits, L. 2006. Good genes sexual selection in nature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 16343 16345.
10. Chapman, T. Partridge, L. 1996. Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263 : 755 759.
11. Chapman, T., Trevitt, S. Partridge, L. 1994. Remating and male-derived nutrients in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 7 : 51 69.
12. Cheng, K.M., Burns, J.T. McKinney, F. 1982. Forced copulation in captive mallards (Anas platyrhynchos): 2. Temporal factors. Anim. Behav. 30 : 695 699.
13. Cheng, K.M., Burns, J.T. McKinney, F. 1983. Forced copulation in captive mallards 3. Sperm competition. Auk 100 : 302 310.
14. Cunningham, E.J.A. Russell, A.F. 2001. Differential allocation and 'good genes'- Comment from Cunningham & Russell. TREE 16 : 21 21.
15. Dickemann, M. 1979a. Female infanticide, reproductive strategies, and social stratification: a preliminary model. In : Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective (N. Chagnon W. Irons, eds pp. 321 367. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MS, USA.
16. Dickemann, M. 1979b. The ecology of mating systems in hypergynous dowry societies. Soc. Sci. Inf. 18 : 163 195.
17. Dickemann, M. 1981. Paternal confidence and dowry competition: a biocultural analysis of purdah. In : Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (R.D. Alexander D.W. Tinkle, eds pp. 417 438. Chiron, New York.
18. Drickamer, L.C., Gowaty, P.A. Holmes, C.M. 2000. Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Anim. Behav. 59 : 371 378.
19. Drickamer, L.C., Gowaty, P.A. Wagner, D.M. 2003. Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance. Anim. Behav. 65 : 105 114.
20. Foerster, K., Delhey, K., Johnsen, A., Lifjeld, J.T. Kempenaers, B. 2003. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature 425 : 714 717.
21. Gowaty, P.A. 1996. Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In : Black Partnerships in Birds (J.L. Black, ed pp. 21 52 Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. Gowaty, P.A. 1997. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in mating behavior. In : Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers (P.A. Gowaty, ed pp. 351 384. Chapman Hall, New York.
23. Gowaty, P.A. 2003. Power asymmetries between the sexes, mate preferences, and components of fitness. In : Women, Evolution, and Rape (C. Travis, ed pp. 61 86. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
24. Gowaty, P.A. Buschhaus, N. 1998. Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy. Am. Zool. 38 : 207 225.
25. Gowaty, P.A. Hubbell, S.P. 2005. Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. J. Integrat. Comp. Biol. 45 : 931 944.
26. Gowaty, P.A., Steinechen, R. Anderson, W.W. 2003. Indiscriminate females and choosy males: within- and between-species variation in Drosophila. Evolution 57 : 2037 2045.
27. Gowaty, P.A., Anderson, W.W., Bluhm, C.K., Drickamer, L.C., Kim, Y.K. Moore, A.J. 2007. The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 : 15023 15027.
28. Hamilton, W.D. Zuk, M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 18 : 384 387.
29. Hrdy, S.B. 1974. Male-male competition and infanticide among the langurs (Presbytis entellus) of Abu, Rajasthan. Folia Primatol. 22 : 19 58.
30. Hrdy, S.B. 1977. The Langurs of Abu: Female and Male Strategies of Reproduction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
31. Hrdy, S.B. 1979. Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1 : 13 40.
32. Hrdy, S.B. 1981. The Woman That Never Evolved. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
33. Hubbell, S.P. Johnson, L.K. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130 : 91 112.
34. Joblonka, E. Lamb, M. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. MIT Press, Boston.
35. Kim, Y.-K., Gowaty, P.A. Anderson, W.W. 2005. Testing for mate preference and mate choice in Drosophila pseudoobscura. In : Proceedings for the 5th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research (L.J.J. Noldus, F. Grieco, L.W.S. Loijens P.H. Zimmerman, eds pp. 533 535. Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
36. McKinney, F., Derrickson, S.R. Mineau, P. 1983. Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behaviour 86 : 250 294.
37. Meagher, S., Penn, D.J. Potts, W.K. 2000. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 : 3324 3329.
38. Moore, A.J., Haynes, K.F., Preziosi, R.F. Moore, P.J. 2002. The evolution of interacting phenotypes: genetics and evolution of social dominance. Am. Nat. 160 : S186 S197.
39. Moore, A.J., Gowaty, P.A. Moore, P.J. 2003. Females avoid manipulative males and live longer. J. Evol. Biol. 16 : 523 530.
40. Navara, K.J., Hill, G.E. Mendonca, M.T. 2006. Yolk androgen deposition as a compensatory strategy. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60 : 392 398.
41. Penn, D.J. Potts, W.K. 1999. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 153 : 145 164.
42. Relyea, R.A. 2002. Costs of phenotypic plasticity. Am. Nat. 159 : 272 282.
43. Rice, W. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381 : 232 234.
44. Ryan, K.K. Altmann, J. 2001. Selection for male choice based primarily on mate compatibility in the oldfield mouse, Peromyscus polionotus rhoadsi. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50 : 436 440.
45. Scheiner, S.M. Berrigan, D. 1998. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VIII. The cost of plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Evolution 52 : 368 378.
46. Sheldon, B.C. 2000. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 : 397 402.
47. Smuts, B. 1992. Male aggression against women: an evolutionary perspective. Hum. Nat. 3 : 1 44.
48. Smuts, B. 1995. The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Hum. Nat. 6 : 1 32.
49. Smuts, B. Smuts, R.W. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv. Study Behav. 22 : 1 63.
50. Steiner, U.K. Van Buskirk, J. 2008. Environmental stress and the costs of whole-organism phenotypic plasticity in tadpoles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21 : 97 103.
51. Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory 1 : 1 30.
52. Wedekind, C. Furi, S. 1997. Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264 : 1471 1479.
53. Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F. Paepke, A.J. 1995. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260 : 245 249.
54. West-Eberhard, M.J. 1979. Social competition and evolution. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 123 : 222 234.
55. West-Eberhard, M.J. 1984. Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. In : Insect Communication (T. Lewis, ed pp. 283 324. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.
56. West-Eberhard, M.J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.