Male perception of female mating status: its effect on copulation duration, sperm defence and female fitness

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1259-1268

  Friberg, Urban ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CUE; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; FLY; GENETIC MARKER; MATING BEHAVIOR; MULTIPLE MATING; REPRODUCTIVE STATUS; SPERM COMPETITION;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 33751299003     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andrés J.A., and Cordero-Rivera A. Copulation duration and fertilization success in a damselfly: an example of cryptic female choice?. Animal Behaviour 59 (2000) 695-703
2. Anthony C., and Jallon J. The chemical basis of sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology 28 (1982) 873-880
3. Arnqvist G., and Danielsson I. Postmating sexual selection: the effects of male body size and recovery period on relative paternity success and female egg production rate in a water strider. Behavioral Ecology 10 (1999) 358-365
4. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Sexual Conflict (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
5. Bastock M., and Manning A. The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8 (1955) 85-111
6. Birkhead T.R., and Møller A.P. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (1998), Academic Press, London
7. Bonduriansky R. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biological Reviews 76 (2001) 305-339
8. Carazo P., Sanchez E., Font E., and Desfilis E. Chemosensory cues allow male Tenebrio molitor beetles to assess the reproductive status of potential males. Animal Behaviour 68 (2004) 123-129
9. Chapman T. A cost of mating with males that do not transfer sperm in female Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology 38 (1992) 223-227
10. Chapman T. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87 (2001) 511-521
11. Chapman T., Hutchings J., and Partridge L. No reduction in the cost of mating for Drosophila melanogaster females mating with spermless males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 253 (1993) 211-217
12. Chapman T., Liddle L.F., Kalib J.M., Wolfner M.F., and Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373 (1995) 241-244
13. Chenoweth S.F., and Blows M.W. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. American Naturalist 165 (2005) 281-289
14. Clutton-Brock T., and Langley P. Persistent courtship reduces male and female longevity in captive tsetse flies Glossina morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae). Behavioral Ecology 8 (1997) 392-395
15. Cook P.A., and Gage M.J.G. Effects of risk of sperm competition on the number of apyrene and eupyrene sperm ejaculated in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36 (1995) 261-268
16. Cook P.A., and Wedell N. Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 263 (1996) 1047-1051
17. Cook R. Courtship of Drosophila melanogaster: rejection without extrusion. Behaviour 52 (1975) 155-171
18. Cook R., and Cook A. The attractiveness to males of female Drosophila melanogaster: effects of mating, age and diet. Animal Behaviour 23 (1975) 521-526
19. Cordts R., and Partridge L. Courtship reduces longevity of male Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 52 (1996) 269-278
20. Coyne J.A., and Charlesworth B. Genetics of a pheromonal difference affecting sexual isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia. Genetics 145 (1997) 1015-1030
21. Coyne J.A., Crittenden A.P., and Mah K. Genetics and pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265 (1994) 1461-1464
22. Coyne J.A., Wicker-Thomas C., and Jallon J.M. A gene responsible for a cuticular hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 73 (1999) 189-203
23. delBarco-Trillo J., and Ferkin M.H. Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males. Nature 431 (2004) 446-449
24. Dewsbury D.A. Ejaculate cost and male choice. American Naturalist 119 (1982) 601-610
25. Dickinson J.L. Prolonged mating in the milkweed leaf beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomedlidae): a test of the 'sperm loading' hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Scociobiology 18 (1986) 331-338
26. Engqvist L., and Sauer K.P. Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268 (2001) 729-735
27. Ferveur J.F., Cobb M., and Jallon J.M. Complex chemical messages in Drosophila. In: Singh R.N., and Strausfeld N.J. (Eds). Neurobiology of Sensory Systems (1989), Plenum, New York 397-409
28. Fowler K., and Partridge L. A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338 (1989) 760-761
29. Friberg U., Lew T.A., Byrne P.G., and Rice W.R. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation. Evolution 59 (2005) 1540-1551
30. Gage M.J.G. Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Animal Behaviour 42 (1991) 1036-1037
31. Gage M.J.G., and Baker R.R. Ejaculate size varies with socio-sexual situation in an insect. Ecological Entomology 16 (1991) 331-337
32. Gilchrist A.S., and Partridge L. Why it is difficult to model sperm displacement in Drosophila melanogaster: the relation between sperm transfer and copulation duration. Evolution 54 (2000) 534-542
33. Hadrys H., Schierwater B., Dellaporta S.L., Desalle R., and Buss L.W. Determination of paternity in dragonflies by random amplified DNA fingerprinting. Molecular Ecology 2 (1993) 79-87
34. Harris W.E., and Moore P.J. Female mate preferences and sexual conflict: females prefer males that have had few consorts. American Naturalist 165 supplement (2005) S64-S71
35. Harshman L., and Prout T. Sperm displacement without sperm transfer. Evolution 48 (1994) 758-766
36. Ivy T.M., Weddle C.B., and Sakaluk S.K. Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272 (2005) 2475-2478
37. Kotiaho J.S., and Simmons L.W. Longevity cost of reproduction for males but no longevity cost of mating or courtship for females in the male-dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus binodis. Journal of Insect Physiology 49 (2003) 817-822
38. Kotiaho J.S., Alatalo R.V., Mappes J., Nielsen M.G., Parri S., and Rivero A. Energetic cost of size and sexual signalling in a wolf spider. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265 (1998) 2203-2209
39. Kuijfer, B. Stewart, A. D. & Rice, W. R. In press. The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
40. Lewis S.M., and Iannini J. Fitness consequences of differences in male mating behaviour in relation to female reproductive status in flour beetles. Animal Behaviour 50 (1995) 1157-1160
41. McLain D.K. Female choice and the adaptive significance of prolonged copulation in Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Psyche 87 (1980) 325-336
42. Marcillac F., and Ferveur J.F. A set of pheromones affects reproduction before, during and after mating in Drosophila. Journal of Experimental Biology 207 (2004) 3927-3933
43. Martin O.Y., and Hosken D.J. Strategic ejaculation in the common dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Animal Behaviour 63 (2002) 541-546
44. Martin O.Y., and Hosken D.J. Copulation reduces male but not female longevity in Saltella sphondylli (Diptera: Sepsidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17 (2004) 357-362
45. Michiels N.K. Consequences and adaptive significance of variation in copulation duration in the dragonfly Sympetrum danae. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29 (1992) 429-435
46. Morrow E.H., Stewart A.D., and Rice W.R. Patterns of sperm precedence are not affected by female mating history in D. melanogaster. Evolution 59 (2005) 2608-2615
47. Parker G.A. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews 45 (1970) 525-567
48. Partridge L., and Farquhar M. Sexual activity reduces lifespan of male fruitflies. Nature 294 (1981) 580-582
49. Prowse N., and Partridge L. The effects of reproduction on longevity and fertility in male Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology 43 (1997) 501-512
50. Rice W.R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381 (1996) 232-234
51. Rice W.R., Linder J.E., Friberg U., Lew T.A., Morrow E.H., and Stewart A.D. Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 102 (2005) 6527-6534
52. Robertson F.S., and Reeve E. Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection of wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Genetics 50 (1952) 414-448
53. Rubenstein D.I. Sperm competition in the water strider Gerris remigis. Animal Behaviour 38 (1989) 631-636
54. Rypstra A.L., Wieg C., Walker S.E., and Persons M.H. Mutual mate assessment in wolf spiders: differences in the cues used by males and females. Ethology 109 (2003) 315-325
55. Savarit F., Sureau G., Cobb M., and Ferveur J.F. Genetic elimination of known pheromones reveals the fundamental chemical bases of mating and isolation in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 96 (1999) 9015-9030
56. Scott D., Richmond R.C., and Carlson D.A. Pheromones exchanged during mating: a mechanism for mate assessment in Drosophila. Animal Behaviour 36 (1988) 1164-1173
57. Simmons L.W. Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects (2001), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
58. Simmons L.W., and Siva-Jothy M.T. Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In: Birkhead T., and Møller A. (Eds). Sexual Selection and Sperm Competition (1998), Academic Press, London 341-434
59. Simmons L.W., Llorens T., Schinzig M., Hosken D., and Craig M. Sperm competition selects for male mate choice and protandry in the bushcricket, Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Animal Behaviour 47 (1994) 117-122
60. Singh R.S., and Singh B.N. Female remating in Drosophila: comparison of duration of copulation between first and second mating in six species. Current Science 86 (2004) 465-470
61. Siva-Jothy M.T., and Stutt A.D. A matter of taste: direct detection of female mating status in the bedbug. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270 (2003) 649-652
62. Smith C., Reichard M., and Jurajda P. Assessment of sperm competition by European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53 (2003) 206-213
63. Snook R.R., and Hosken D.J. Sperm death and dumping in Drosophila. Nature 428 (2004) 939-941
64. Thornhill R., and Sauer K.P. The notal organ of the scorpionfly (Panorpa vulgaris): an adaptation to coerce mating duration. Behavioral Ecology 2 (1991) 156-164
65. Tompkins L. Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila. Behavior Genetics 14 (1984) 411-440
66. Tompkins L., and Hall J.C. The different effects on courtship of volatile compounds from mated and virgin Drosophila females. Journal of Insect Physiology 27 (1981) 17-21
67. Vepsäläinen K., and Savolainen R. Operational sex ratios and mating conflicts between the sexes in the water strider Gerris lacustris. American Naturalist 146 (1995) 869-880
68. Wedell N. Protandry and mate assessment in the wartbiter Decticus verrucivorus (Orthoptera, Tettigonidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31 (1992) 301-308
69. Wedell N., Gage M.J.D., and Parker G.A. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 (2002) 313-320
70. Wolfner M.F. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27 (1997) 179-192