The White (Male) Effect and Risk Perception: Can Equality Make a Difference?

Risk Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1016-1032

  Olofsson, Anna ^a   Rashid, Saman ^a  

^a MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Equality; Gender and ethnicity; Risk perception; The white male effect

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EQUALITY; ETHNIC MINORITIES; GENDER AND ETHNICITY; SOCIO-ECONOMICS; THE WHITE MALE EFFECT;

RISK PERCEPTION;

DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ETHNIC MINORITY; GENDER IDENTITY; NATIVE SPECIES; RISK PERCEPTION; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; HUMAN; MALE; RISK; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SWEDEN; UNITED STATES;

EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; HUMANS; MALE; RISK; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SWEDEN; UNITED STATES;

SWEDEN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79959192856     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01566.x     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield TA. Gender, race, and perceived risk: The "white male" effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2000; 2(2):159-172.
2. Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 1994; 14(6):1101-1109.
3. Kahan DM, Braman D, Gastil J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007; 4(3):465-505.
4. Kalof L, Dietz T, Gaugnano G, Stern PC. Race, gender and environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men. Race, Gender and Class, 2002 9(2):1-19.
5. Palmer CGS. Risk perception: Another look at the "white male" effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2003; 5(1):71-83.
6. Kahan DM, Slovic P, Braman D, Gastil J, Cohen G. Nanotechnology risk perception: The influence of affect and values. Culture Cognition Project Working Paper No. 22. Available at: Accessed on August 11, 2008.
7. Satterfield TA, Mertz CK, Slovic P. Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(1):115-129.
8. Franzen A. Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly, 2003; 84(2):297-308.
9. Hayes BC. Gender, scientific knowledge, and attitudes toward the environment: A cross-national analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 2001; 54(3):657-671.
10. Olofsson A, Öhman S. General beliefs and environmental concern. Transatlantic comparisons. Environment and Behavior, 2006; 38(6):768-790.
11. Pakulski J, Tranter B, Crook S. The dynamics of environmental issues in Australia: Concerns, clusters and carriers. Australian Journal of Political Science, 1998; 33(2):235-252.
12. Dunlap RE, Michelson W (eds). Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Westport Greenwood, 2002.
13. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge Polity Press, 1990.
14. Svallfors S (ed). The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages and Orientations. Stanford Stanford University Press, 2007.
15. Johnson BB. Gender and race in beliefs about outdoor air pollution. Risk Analysis, 2002; 22(4):725-738.
16. Brody CJ. Differences by sex in support for nuclear power. Social Forces, 1984; 63(1):209-228.
17. Davidson DJ, Freudenberg WR. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment & Behavior, 1996; 28(3):302-339.
18. Gutteling J, Wiegman O. Gender specific reactions to environmental hazards in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 1993; 28(7/8):433-447.
19. Johnson BB. Arguments for testing ethnic identity and acculturation as factors in risk judgments. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(5):1279-1287.
20. Johnson CY, Bowker JM, Cordell KH. Ethnic variation in environmental belief and behavior: An examination of the new ecological paradigm in a social psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 2004; 36(2):157-186.
21. Mohai P. Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources, 1992 5(1):1-19.
22. Mohai P, Bryant B. Is there a "race" effect on concern to environmental quality Public Opinion Quarterly, 1998; 62(4):475-505.
23. Öhman S. Public Perceptions of Gene Technology: On the Edge of Risk Society? Sweden Umeå University, 2002.
24. Öhman S. Different shades of green: Lifestyles and environmental attitudes in Sweden. In Miller, JD (ed). Perceptions of Biotechnology: Public Understanding and Attitudes. Cresskill, NJ Hampton Press, 2001.
25. Whittaker M, Segura GM, Bowler S. Racial/ethnic group attitudes toward environmental protection in California: Is "environmentalism" still a white phenomenon Political Research Quarterly, 2005; 58(3):435-447.
26. Zinn HC, Pierce CL. Values, gender, and concern about potentially dangerous wildlife. Environment and Behavior, 2002; 34(2):239-256.
27. Enander A. Människors förhållningssätt till risker, olyckor och kriser. Karlstad Räddningsverket, 2005.
28. Enander A, Johansson A. Säkerhet och risker i vardagen: En studie av uppfattningar, värderingar och beteenden hos allmänheten i Sverige. Karlstad Räddningsverket, 2002.
29. Gustafsson PE. Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(6):805-811.
30. Olofsson A. Crisis communication in multicultural societies: A study of municipalities in Sweden. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 2007; 25(2):145-172.
31. Olofsson A, Öhman S. Views of risk in Sweden: Global fatalism and local control. An empirical investigation of Ulrich Beck's theory of modern risks. Journal of Risk Research, 2007; 10(2):177-196.
32. Hakes JK, Viscusi WK. Dead reckoning: Demographic determinants of the accuracy of mortality risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(3):651-664.
33. Barke RP, Jenkins-Smith, Slovic P. Risk perception of men and women scientists. Social Science Quarterly, 1997; 78(1):167-176.
34. Slovic P. Are trivial risks the greatest risks of all? Journal of Risk Research, 1999 2(4):281-288.
35. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. London Earthscan Publications, 2000.
36. Douglas M. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London Barrie & Rockliff, 1970.
37. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA University of California Press, 1982.
38. Dake K. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk. An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1991; 22:61-82.
39. Wildavsky A, Dake K. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 1990 119(4):41-60.
40. Grendstad G, Selle P. Cultural theory, postmaterialism and environmental attitudes. In Ellis RJ, Thompson M (eds). Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky. Boulder, CO Westview, 1997.
41. Marris C, Langford IH, O'Riordan T. A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perception: Comparison with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(5):635-647.
42. Peters E, Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1996; 26(16):1427-1453.
43. Rippl S. Cultural theory and risk perception: A proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 2002; 5(2):147-165.
44. Slimak MW, Dietz T. Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2006; 26(6):1689-1705.
45. Stern PC. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 2000; 56(3):407-424.
46. Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 1999; 6(8):1-97.
47. Savage I. Demographic influences on risk perception. Risk Analysis, 1993; 13(4):413-420.
48. Marshall BK. Gender, race and perceived environmental risk: The "white male" effect in Cancer Valley, LA. Sociological Spectrum, 2004; 24(4):453-478.
49. Barnshaw J, Trainor J. Race, class and capital amidst the hurricane Katrina Diaspora. In Brunsma DL, Overfelt D, Picou JS (eds). The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a Modern Catastrophe. Boulder, CO Rowman & Littlefield, 2007.
50. Morrow HB. Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters, 1999; 23(1):1-18.
51. Wisner BP, Blaikie T, Cannon, I, Davis I. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. London Routledge, 2004.
52. Fothergill A, Maester G M, Darlington JD. Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 1999; 23(2):156-173.
53. Inglehart R, Welzel C. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 2005.
54. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values. New York Free Press, 1973.
55. Schwartz SH, Blisky W. Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personal Social Psychology, 1987; 53(3) 550-562.
56. United Nations Development Program. Available at: Accessed on December 1, 2008.
57. Lopez-Carlos A, Zahidi S. Women's empowerment: Measuring the global gender gap. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available at: Accessed on June 2, 2008.
58. Portes A, Rumbaut R. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley, CA University of California Press, 2001.
59. Statistics Sweden. Available at: Accessed on January 15, 2009.
60. Arai M, Regnér H, Schröder L. Är arbetsmarknaden öppen för alla? Appendix 6 of Långtidsutredningen 1999 (SOU 2000:7). Fritzes Stockholm, 1999.
61. Rashid S. Internal migration and income of immigrant families. Journal of Immigrants and Refugee Studies, 2009; 7(2):180-200.
62. de los Reyes P, Kamali M (eds). Bortom Vi och Dom. Teoretiska Reflektioner Bortom makt, Integration och Strukturell Diskriminering (SOU 2005:41). Stockholm Fritzes, 2005.
63. Carlsson M, Rooth D. Etnisk diskriminering på svensk arbetsmarknad-resultat från ett fältexperiment. Ekonomisk Debatt, 2007; 35(3):55-68.
64. Schmauch U. Den Osynliga Vardagsrasismen. Sweden Umeå universitet, 2006.
65. Coussey M. Tackling racial equality: International comparisons. Home Office Research Study 238. Available at: Accessed on February 3, 2009.
66. Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2000; 20(1):1-11.
67. McEachrane M, Faye L. Sverige och de Andra: Postkoloniala Perspektiv. Stockholm Natur och Kutur, 2001.
68. Svanberg I, Tydén M. I Nationalismens Bakvatten. Lund Studentlitteratur, 1999.
69. Greene, WH. Econometric Analysis. 2nd ed. New York MacMillan, 1993.
70. Inglehart R, Norris P. Rising Tide-Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 2003.
71. United Nations Development Program. Human Development Report, 2009. Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. New York Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: Accessed on January 20, 2010.
72. Olsen GM. Labour market policy in the United States, Canada and Sweden: Addressing the issue of convergence. Social Policy & Administration, 2008; 42(4):323-341.
73. Olofsson A, Öhman S. Risk perception and risk behaviour in a heterogeneous society. Submitted to International Sociology, December 2010.
74. Fischer GW, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Nair I, Lave LB. What risks are people concerned about. Risk Analysis, 1991; 11(2):303-314.
75. Lacatus C. What is a blatte? Migration and ethnic identity in contemporary Sweden. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 2007; 1(1):79-92.
76. Rivers L, Joseph A, Slovic P. Beyond a simple case of black and white: Searching for the white male effect in the African-American community. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30(1):65-77.