An improved kinetic model for the acetone-butanol-ethanol pathway of Clostridium acetobutylicum and model-based perturbation analysis

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Li, Ru Dong ^a   Li, Yuan Yuan ^a,b   Lu, Ling Yi ^a   Ren, Cong ^c   Li, Yi Xue ^a,b   Liu, Lei ^a,b  

^a Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People s Hospital   (China)

^b SHANGHAI CENTER FOR BIOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM;

ACETONE; ALCOHOL; BUTANOL; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; KINETICS; METABOLISM;

ACETONE; BUTANOLS; CLOSTRIDIUM ACETOBUTYLICUM; ETHANOL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOLVENTS;

EID: 79959189547     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-S1-S12     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Granström T, Aristidou AA, Leisola M. Metabolic flux analysis of Candida tropicalis growing on xylose in an oxygen-limited chemostat. Metab Eng 2002, 4:248-256. 10.1006/mben.2002.0230, 12616694.
2. Shimizu H, Takiguchi N, Tanaka H, Shioya S. A maximum production strategy of lysine based on a simplified model derived from a metabolic reaction network. Metab Eng 1999, 1:299-308. 10.1006/mben.1999.0127, 10937823.
3. Stephanopoulos G, Vallino JJ. Network rigidity and metabolic engineering in metabolite overproduction. Science 1991, 252:1675-1681. 10.1126/science.1904627, 1904627.
4. Bailey JE. Toward a science of metabolic engineering. Science 1991, 252:1668-1675. 10.1126/science.2047876, 2047876.
5. Desai RP, Harris LM, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET. Metabolic flux analysis elucidates the importance of the acid-formation pathways in regulating solvent production by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Metab Eng 1999, 1:206-213. 10.1006/mben.1999.0118, 10937935.
6. Gapes JR. The economics of acetone-butanol fermentation: Theoretical and market considerations. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2000, 2:27-32.
7. Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: Part I. Metabolic network resolution and analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 101:1036-1052. 10.1002/bit.22010, 2760220, 18767192.
8. Desai RP, Nielsen LK, Papoutsakis ET. Stoichiometric modeling of Clostridium acetobutylicum fermentations with non-linear constraints. J Biotechnol 1999, 71:191-205. 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00022-X, 10483106.
9. Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: Part II. Development of specific proton flux states and numerically determined sub-systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 101:1053-1071. 10.1002/bit.22009, 2745297, 18767191.
10. Lee J, Yun H, Feist AM, Palsson BO. Genome-scale reconstruction and in silico analysis of the Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 metabolic network. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 80:849-862. 10.1007/s00253-008-1654-4, 18758767.
11. Jones DT, Woods DR. Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol Rev 1986, 50:484-524. 373084, 3540574.
12. Tashiro Y, Takeda K, Kobayashi G, Sonomoto K, Ishizaki A, et al. High butanol production by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 in fed-batch culture with pH-stat continuous butyric acid and glucose feeding method. J Biosci Bioeng 2004, 98:263-268.
13. Soni BK, Das K, Ghose TK. Inhibitory factors involved in acetone-butanol fermentation by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum. Curr Microbiol 1987, 16:61-67.
14. Shinto H, Tashiro Y, Yamashita M, Kobayashi G, Sekiguchi T, et al. Kinetic modeling and sensitivity analysis of acetone-butanol-ethanol production. J Biotechnol 2007, 131:45-56. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.05.005, 17614153.
15. Alsaker KV, Papoutsakis ET. Transcriptional program of early sporulation and stationary-phase events in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 2005, 187:7103-7118. 10.1128/JB.187.20.7103-7118.2005, 1251621, 16199581.
16. Zhao Y, Tomas CA, Rudolph FB, Papoutsakis ET, Bennett GN. Intracellular butyryl phosphate and acetyl phosphate concentrations in Clostridium acetobutylicum and their implications for solvent formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:530-537. 10.1128/AEM.71.1.530-537.2005, 544202, 15640230.
17. Thormann K, Feustel L, Lorenz K, Nakotte S, Durre P. Control of butanol formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum by transcriptional activation. J Bacteriol 2002, 184:1966-1973. 10.1128/JB.184.7.1966-1973.2002, 134926, 11889105.
18. Green EM, Boynton ZL, Harris LM, Rudolph FB, Papoutsakis ET, et al. Genetic manipulation of acid formation pathways by gene inactivation in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Microbiology 1996, 142:2079-2086. 10.1099/13500872-142-8-2079, 8760920.
19. Harris LM, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET. Northern, morphological, and fermentation analysis of spo0A inactivation and overexpression in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 2002, 184:3586-3597. 10.1128/JB.184.13.3586-3597.2002, 135115, 12057953.
20. Monot F, Martin J, Petitdemange H, Gay R. Acetone and butanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum in a synthetic medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982, 44:1318-1324. 242190, 16346149.
21. Gheshlaghi R, Scharer JM, Moo-Young M, Chou CP. Metabolic pathways of clostridia for producing butanol. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27:764-781. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.06.002, 19539744.
22. Hartmanis MGN, Gatenbeck S. Intermediary metabolism in Clostridium acetobutylicum: Levels of enzymes involved in the formation of acetate and butyrate. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984, 47:1277-1283. 240219, 16346566.
23. Tummala SB, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET. Development and characterization of a gene expression reporter system for Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65:3793-3799. 99702, 10473377.
24. Segrè D, Vitkup D, Church GM. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:15112-15117. 10.1073/pnas.232349399, 137552, 12415116.
25. Shlomi T, Berkman O, Ruppin E. Regulatory on/ off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:7695-7700. 10.1073/pnas.0406346102, 1140402, 15897462.
26. Kitano H. Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5:826-837. 10.1038/nrg1471, 15520792.
27. Bloom JD, Lu Z, Chen D, Raval A, Venturelli OS, et al. Evolution favors protein mutational robustness in sufficiently large population. BMC Biol 2007, 5:29. 10.1186/1741-7007-5-29, 1995189, 17640347.
28. Ideker T, Galitski T, Hood L. A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annu Rev Genom Human Genet 2001, 2:343-372.
29. Hood L. Systems biology: integrating technology, biology and computation. Mech Ageing Dev 2003, 124:9-16. 10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00164-1, 12618001.
30. Tomas CA, Beamish J, Papoutsakis ET. Transcriptional analysis of butanol stress and tolerance in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 2004, 186:2006-2018. 10.1128/JB.186.7.2006-2018.2004, 374415, 15028684.