Strange spaces: A rationale for bringing art and artists into the planning process

Planning Theory

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 213-238

  Metzger, Jonathan ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

artists; Planning; public sphere; stakeholders; verfremdung

Indexed keywords

ART; LITERATURE REVIEW; PLANNING METHOD; RESEARCH WORK; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 79958850812     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095210389653     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Allmendinger P.Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory.Planning Theory. 2002;1 (1): 77-99.
2. Bauman ZCulture as Praxis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1973:.
3. Benhabib SSituating the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1992:.
4. Bhabha HK,Rutherford JIdentity: Community, Culture, Difference. Rutherford J, ed. London: Lawrence & Wishart; 1990:207-221.
5. Culture and Neighbourhoods. vol. 2, A comparative report. Bianchini FSantacatterina L, ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 1997:.
6. Bloch E.'Entfremdung, verfremdung': Alienation, estrangement.The Drama Review: TDR. 1970;15 (1): 120-25.
7. Bourdieu PThe Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993:.
8. Brand R,Gaffikin F.Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world.Planning Theory. 2007;6 (3): 282-313.
9. Brecht BBrecht on Theatre. Willett J, ed. New York: Methuen; 1964:91-9.
10. Campbell H,Marshall R.Utilitarianism's bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning.Planning Theory. 2002;1 (2): 163-187.
11. Carlyon D.The trickster as academic comfort food.The Journal of American Culture. 2003;25 (1-2): 14-18.
12. Cars GCharette: tre åkturer med 'den lilla kärran'. Stockholm: Royal Institute Of Technology, Department of Regional Planning; 2001:.
13. Castro Nogueira L.Bubbles, globes, wrappings, and plektopoi: Minimal notes to rethink metaphysics from the standpoint of the social sciences.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2009;27 (1): 87-104.
14. Cohen JDiversity and its Discontents. Smelser NAlexander J, ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1999:.
15. Dang SR.A starter menu for planner/artist collaborations.Planning Theory and Practice. 2005;6 (1): 123-126.
16. Debord GThe Society of the Spectacle. London: Rebel Press; 2004:.
17. Debord G,Wolman GJSituationist International Anthology. Knabb K., ed. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets; 2006:.
18. Deikman AJ.Deautomatization and the mystic experience.Psychiatry. 1966;29:324-38.
19. Dryzek J.Deliberative democracy in divided societies: Alternatives to agonism and analgesia.Political Theory. 2005;33 (2): 218-42.
20. Dugdale AActor Network Theory and After. Law JHassard J, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999:113-35.
21. Edmundson M.Playing the fool.New York Times Books. 2000;:.
22. Evans GCultural Planning: An Urban Renaissance?. London: Routledge; 2001:.
23. Faludi A.The performance of spatial planning.Planning Practice and Research. 2000;15 (4): 299-318.
24. Faludi AEvaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects. Alexander E., ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:119-46.
25. Florida RLCities and the Creative Class. New York: Routledge; 2005:.
26. Flyvbjerg BRationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1998:.
27. Fung A.Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences.Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003;11 (3): 338-67.
28. Garbutt R.The Clearing: Heidegger's Lichtung and the big scrub.Cultural Studies Review. 2010;16 (1): 27-42.
29. Gardiner M.Everyday utopianism: Lefebvre and his critics.Cultural Studies. 2004;18 (2): 228-54.
30. Gordon M.A view from the pavement.Planning Theory and Practice. 2005;6 (1): 119-23.
31. Gramsci AThe Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916-1935. New York: New York University Press; 2000:.
32. Gray C.Joining-up or tagging on? The arts, cultural planning and the view from below.Public Policy and Administration. 2004;19 (2): 38-49.
33. Grossberg LStuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. Morley DChen K-S, ed. London: Routledge; 1996:151-73.
34. Hache E,Latour B.Morality or moralism? An exercise in sensitization.Common Knowledge. 2010;16 (2): 311-37.
35. Harvey DSpaces of Hope. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000:.
36. Healey PCollaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006:.
37. Heidegger MPoetry, Language, Thought. New York: Harper & Row; 1971:.
38. Hillier JShadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning. London: Routledge; 2002:.
39. Hillier J.Agon'izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be 'real'.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (1): 37-59.
40. Hillier JStretching Beyond the Horizon: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning and Governance. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007:.
41. Hinchliffe S,Kearnes MB,Degen M,Whatmore S.Ecologies and economies of action: Sustainability, calculations, and other things.Environment and Planning A. 2007;39 (2): 260-82.
42. Jameson FBrecht and Method. London: Verso; 2000:.
43. Jensen OB.Culture stories: Understanding cultural urban branding.Planning Theory,. 2007;6 (3): 211-36.
44. Kaza N.Tyranny of the median and costly consent: A reflection on the justification for participatory urban planning processes.Planning Theory. 2006;5 (3): 255-70.
45. Kristeva JStrangers to Ourselves. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991:.
46. Künstlicher RThe Psychoanalytic Situation as a Play Situation: Exploration of a Multi-Faceted Clinical Situation. Stockholm: Stockholm University Department of Education; 2009:.
47. Kunzmann KR.Culture, creativity and spatial planning.Town Planning Review. 2004;75 (4): 383-404.
48. Kwon MOne Place After Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004:.
49. Landry CThe Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan; 2000:.
50. Landry C.Urban Acupuncture.Planning Theory and Practice. 2005;6 (1): 117-18.
51. Latour BScience in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987:.
52. Latour B.How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies.Body and Society. 2004;10 (2/3): 205-29.
53. Latour BReassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
54. Law JOrganizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell; 1994:.
55. Lefebvre HNietzsche. Paris: Editions sociales internationales; 1939:.
56. Lefebvre HMarxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Nelson CGrossberg L, ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1988:.
57. Lefebvre HThe Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1991:.
58. Mackie G.Does democratic deliberation change minds?.Politics, Philosophy and Economics. 2006;5 (3): 279-303.
59. Maguire TGiving the Public its Day: How Three Pilots Have Used Different Forms of Charettes to Enliven Community Involvement Efforts. New Brunswick: Institute for Responsible Management; 1998:.
60. March A,Low N.Knowing and steering: Mediatization, planning and democracy in Victoria, Australia.Planning Theory. 2004;3 (1): 41-69.
61. Markusen A,King DThe Artistic Dividend: The Arts' Hidden Contributions to Regional Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs; 2003:.
62. Miles MArt, Space, and the City: Public Art and Urban Futures. London: Routledge; 1997:.
63. Miles MUrban Avant-Gardes: Art, Architecture and Change. London: Routledge; 2004:.
64. Mouffe CDeliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies; 2000a:.
65. Mouffe CThe Democratic Paradox. London: Verso; 2000b:.
66. Pinder D.Arts of urban exploration.Cultural Geographies. 2005;12 (4): 383-411.
67. Pinder D.Urban interventions: Art, politics and pedagogy.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2008;32 (3): 70-6.
68. Pløger J.Strife: Urban planning and agonism.Planning Theory,. 2004;3 (1): 71-92.
69. Rendell JArt and Architecture: A Place Between. London: IB Tauris; 2006:.
70. Robinson DEstrangement and the Somatics of Literature: Tolstoy, Shklovsky, Brecht. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2008:.
71. Rorty RContingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989:.
72. Royoux JC,Sloterdijk PCosmograms. Ohanian MRoyoux JC, ed. New York: Lukas & Sternberg; 2005:223-40.
73. Sandercock LTowards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1998:.
74. Sandercock L.Practicing utopia: Sustaining cities.DISP. 2002;148:4-9.
75. Sandercock LCosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century. London: Continuum; 2003:.
76. Sandercock L.Towards a planning imagination for the 21st century.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2004;70 (1): 133-41.
77. Sandercock L.Interface: A new spin on the creative city: artist/planner collaborations.Planning Theory and Practice. 2005;6 (1): 101-103.
78. Sarkissian W.Stories in a park: Giving voice to the voiceless in Eagleby, Australia.Planning Theory and Practice. 2005;6 (1): 103-17.
79. Segedy JA,Johnson BEThe Neighbourhood Charette Handbook. Louisville: University of Louisville; 2000:.
80. Shaw K.Don't try this at home.Planning Theory and Practice. 2005;6 (1): 126-8.
81. Shklovskij VLiterary Theory: An Anthology. Rivkin JRyan M, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998:17-23.
82. Sloterdijk PSphären: Mikrosphärologie. 1, Blasen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1998:.
83. Sloterdijk PMaking Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Latour BWeibel P, ed. Karlsruhe: ZKM; 2005:945-51.
84. Sloterdijk P.Rules for the human zoo: A response to the letter on humanism.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2009;27 (1): 12-28.
85. Thrift N.Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect.Geografiska Annaler B. 2004;86 (1): 57-78.
86. Thrift NNon-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. Abingdon: Routledge; 2007:.
87. Thrift N.Different atmospheres: Of Sloterdijk, China, and site.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2009;27 (1): 119-38.
88. Van Tuinen S.Air conditioning spaceship earth: Peter Sloterdijk's ethico-aesthetic paradigm.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2009;27 (1): 105-18.
89. Vygotskij LSThe Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1971:.
90. Wallett WFThe Public Life of W. F. Wallett: The Queen's Jester. London:1870.
91. Wates NThe Community Planning Handbook. London: Earthscan; 2000:.
92. Weber SBenjamin's - Abilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2008:.
93. Young G.The culturization of planning.Planning Theory. 2008;7 (1): 71-91.
94. Young IM.Activist challenges to deliberative democracy.Political Theory. 2001;29 (5): 670-90.